Jump to content

If Mateo gets an operation elbow does that lead to Orioles leaving him of the 40 man this offseason?


Gurgi

Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, DrinkinWithFermi said:

If you exclude his 2022 outlier season, Mateo has been worth a combined 1.7 rWAR/1.6 fWAR for his entire career, and $2.7 million is what he is making in 2024. That number will go up in 2025.

That sure sounds like a non-tender candidate to me.

You also seem to have missed the part of my post about his recovery time and prognosis factoring into the final decision. If he is going to be out recovering from major elbow surgery until June or July, then we could probably invest the $3.5 million or so that he will make next year on someone who will provide more than like 0.4 WAR to the 2025 team.

Curious why you exclude that year? It isn’t like he was cheating or the rules changed. It’s the one season he played as a starter and he showed what he can do. Even this year he was on pace for ~1.5ish WAR playing ~2/3rd of the games. Definite value there and shows 2022 not to be some crazy unheard of year.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Safelykept said:

If he gets non tendered i would think it would be injury related. Heck, they tendered him after last years disaster. Was paying much better this year. Dont confuse anybody's defense at 2nd with Mateo, plus can back up SS. Big speed. He was a nice piece fo us.

That is what I originally said- that it would probably hinge on his health prognosis.

If he is going to be a full go for ST, then sure, tender him a contract, but if he is going to miss the first 2 or 3 months of the season, then that money should probably be invested somewhere else.

But even if he wasn't injured, non-tendering him would still be a perfectly defensible choice, IMO. Glove-only utility bench guys are pretty fungible.

1 minute ago, survivedc said:

Curious why you exclude that year? It isn’t like he was cheating or the rules changed. It’s the one season he played as a starter and he showed what he can do. Even this year he was on pace for ~1.5ish WAR playing ~2/3rd of the games. Definite value there and shows 2022 not to be some crazy unheard of year.

Because he was never that good (a 3.6/2.8 WAR player) before and hasn't been that good since, and he is extremely unlikely to ever be that good again. 

Also, see above reply to Safelykept.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think he or Urias are tendered, and Elias may have been surprised some last winter by how much the market fell on guys like Amed Rosario.

Ideally Westburg, Gunnar, Holliday and Mayo are 150-game infielders.     With Stowers and Santander gone, a luxury bench salary spot maybe gets allocated to OF4 first.

I was glad to hear the report from Elias Q&A the Club a Player was injured with has some role seeing through their rehab even if they aren't employed by that Club any longer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wildcard said:

At first that will depend on how he hits lefties.  Overtime time he will hit everyday.

He’s going to be like Gunnar. They are going to throw him out there everyday regardless of results because they know they will come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

Couldn't we put him on the 60 day IL?

60 Day DL ends with the season, so he has to stay on the 40 man roster during the off-season.  Same for pitchers undergoing TJ, so we also have a decision to make on Tyler Wells, and this also plays a factor in re-signing John Means if they go down that road.  

As for the post topic itself, this is an interesting question.  I think it’s more likely we keep Mateo than Urias.  Mateo is a better defender, and able to also play SS and OF.  He’s also the pinch runner/defensive replacement as well as being a short-side platoon guy.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, DrinkinWithFermi said:

If you exclude his 2022 outlier season, Mateo has been worth a combined 1.7 rWAR/1.6 fWAR for his entire career, and $2.7 million is what he is making in 2024. That number will go up in 2025.

That sure sounds like a non-tender candidate to me.

You also seem to have missed the part of my post about his recovery time and prognosis factoring into the final decision. If he is going to be out recovering from major elbow surgery until June or July, then we could probably invest the $3.5 million or so that he will make next year on someone who will provide more than like 0.4 WAR to the 2025 team.

Why do people do this nonsense of “if you take away the times he was really good, he’s not very good?” 
 

It’s either Mateo or Urias back next year in the UTIL role. A 4M price for Mateo is a bit much, but I don’t see a lot of spending coming in other areas. I could see them bringing Mateo back next year, assuming he’s healthy. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mateo is a true utility guy with the tools to be plus at every position except catcher.  He has blazing speed so adds value as a pinch runner.  He can put up a .300+ wOBA against LHP.  

We don’t have cheap internal options to backfill at utility IF, so we would need to find a free agent. Maybe we can find an Amed Rosario who is cheap and gives us good enough performance, but odds are against it.

I think if Mateo is healthy, he returns.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's not going anywhere. We need infielders and especially those who can play SS. I think the Os will gladly pay $3 million to stash Mateo on the 60-day IL. I don't think there's any question that we will need him at some point next year.

Edited by interloper
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mateo’s sprint speed remains top 5%, his glove is better than anybody we’ve had since Paul Janish ( who couldn’t hit his shoe size) and he’s not a waste at the plate. 
If he goes, how easily could Elias find someone with equal skill? Not very easily.

He returns. That’s a no brainer.

Urias is a more open question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Frobby said:

As an aside, why is it taking so long for Mateo to decide if an operation on his elbow is necessary?   It’s been more than a month since he got injured.  

Apparently they are still waiting for the inflammation to die down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Frobby said:

As an aside, why is it taking so long for Mateo to decide if an operation on his elbow is necessary?   It’s been more than a month since he got injured.  

I thought I read something yesterday that the Dr's are the ones waiting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • All we can do is try to read between the lines of Kremer's statement.  My reading is that he doesn't understand why Holliday is playing 2B instead of someone with a better glove (Soto?) given that he's not hitting.   He could also be wondering why Povich is in the rotation instead of Irvin, or he may be questioning bullpen usage.  I think veterans are skeptical of younger players in general and in this case it is reasonable to wonder whether the front office is dictating that younger players get to play even if they aren't cutting it yet.  
    • Even though it is 2 games it is really just 1 if we win 1 in the series vs the Yankees.  We win 2 out of 3 in that series then we have 12 games to make up the other 1 game.  So saying it isn’t do able seems false but we have to play better for sure.  The Yankees are just middling around just like us.  They should have put us away already with all our injuries to the starters mid season and no the offense as well.  
    • Really excited to have Urias and Westburg back. 
    • I think the Kremer interview is a whole lot of nothing. Having a great game and not getting run support is part of being a pitcher. Walter Johnson lost 26 games by a score of 1-0. Pitchers spend their time thinking about pitching, not how to improve the offense. Dean was asked a dumb question and he gave an honest answer, which is that it's not his job or his place to comment about aspects of the team he has nothing to do with.
    • The OP raises a question. The answer is there is absolutly nothing here but speculation - particularly by those that want there to be issues. Again The Moose nails it but logic doesn't matter in some circles. Some think they see blood and run to the blood they want to see. In fairness, we all latch on to anything that is congruent with our thinking. So I think it's best to let those that want to see issues here do their thing. 
    • That is possible. He will have to prove it. The X factor will be how much he can spend. But making (good) trades this off-season may be more difficult, as other GM's think they can get him to overpay like he did with Rogers. 
    • He should be taking live batting practice soon. I can’t imagine he’s back before the Yankees series. I would think they want him to go on a rehab assignment.  Norfolk’s season ends next Sunday. If he can get there on Tuesday or Wednesday, play through the weekend and then get back for the Yankees series, that would be optimal.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...