Jump to content

Rubenstein Article


SouthRider

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, CTBear said:

The GM hires the manager and after just one year, it’d be unfair for Rubenstein to step in and make that call. He’s already said he’s going to give Elias and Sig room to operate on the baseball side. 
 

That said, if Rubenstein becomes unhappy with Elias’ direction and/or lack of success, then Elias is the one getting canned…I don’t think we’re anywhere near that though. 

Yea I don't want Hyde back but we don't need Rubes pulling a Billy Martin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Orioles0615 said:

Yea I don't want Hyde back but we don't need Rubes pulling a Billy Martin

Yeah I’m with you on that. I’d be very concerned if he started calling shots so early in his ownership tenure. He’s admitted he doesn’t know much about baseball though and has made it clear he won’t be doing things like that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, foxfield said:

I think too many are linking $ to optimism and it is a bad move and what you say above would be terrible. At least in terms of attracting fans. 

If going from the worst team in sports to one of the best doesn't bring fans, then you don't have enough fans.  Everyone has a right to be upset about everything from last October to this October because expectations have not been met.  But they haven't been met by the the O's players themselves.  However, you are talking about attracting fans... the best thing to attract fans would be winning a god darn playoff game.  

My point is that juicing things up by spending an extra $50 million is not what this team needs.  It needs to find pieces to add to this roster that can help push the envelope from successful Divison winning team to World Series Winner.  That might cost more than $50M, it might cost less.  But if the owner juices things and we are not marginally better, then next year folks say Owner doesn't know how to spend....GM foolishly spends...etc. But extra bodies are not going to just show up.

What might that look like?  Well letting Burnes go for the pick.  Signing or trading for no other TOR pitcher to replace Burnes, extending Santander after signing a RH DH of some sort and extending Adley in a 7 yr deal.  That's juicy, and it could even work.  But I doubt it is going to bring any additional fans.

How have we become one of the best teams in sports? We have not won a single playoff game. To think that fans in this community will be satisfied with a bunch of regular season wins is a serious mistake. Can you find any Ravens' fans who were satisfied with the team reaching the AFC Championship game last season? Fans in this town (like most American cities) are hungry for trophies.

You seem to pose things as though it is an either/or proposition. We don't need to spend and add FAs, all we need to do is win. But the reality is when you examining the history of the sport (in the last 20 years) there is a causation effect between payroll and playoff results in the form of championships. "Budget ball" has not won in October.

In my opinion after failing spectacularly in October over the last two seasons, the org us going to have to add meaningful talent to get this team over the hump because as things stand now, it most likely can be projected as more of the same (good regular season poor post season).

Letting go of Burnes for a pitcher who is not as good, resigning Santander, and resigning Adley would be more of the same i.e. running it back with a relatively equivalent to worse group. How would that be a message that entices more fans to get engaged? If you want more fans, you are going to have to make moves that draw attention/get people talking/are relevant. Those moves don't have to be poor/foolish/unwise moves. We can spend in a way that is smart and makes us better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/9/2024 at 10:25 AM, Sports Guy said:

Some other twitter talk. Im not sure how definitive it is and with no “real news” yet, it may just be rumors.

From Roch's article this morning:

The Orioles announced yesterday that executive vice president and chief operating officer Greg Bader has been promoted to executive vice president and general manager of MASN. The transition begins immediately, and a full transition begins Jan. 1.

Bader will report to Catie Griggs, hired earlier this summer as president of baseball operations.

Bader served in his previous role since September 2023 and represented the Orioles at the opening of the new Dominican Republic facility.

“Greg has an unparalleled level of expertise of both baseball administration and the sports industry overall which I’m confident will allow him to seamlessly transition into the role with MASN. I look forward to continuing to work alongside him for years to come,” Griggs said in a statement.

“It’s been an honor to have devoted my professional career to the Orioles and Major League Baseball, and I am equally honored to begin this new role with MASN,” Bader said in a statement. “Like millions of baseball fans throughout the Mid-Atlantic, I have welcomed MASN into my home for the past twenty seasons, and I am thrilled to now play a role in working to enhance that experience as the network continues to bring unmatched coverage of two great teams to two incredible baseball communities.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's wild that Bader gets promoted basically every year and is one of the few holdovers from the Peter Angelos era, when he was Chief Gaslighter and Executive Anti-Press Guard Dog. He's softened since those times, but man. 

It's maybe a little interesting that David has punted him over to MASN. I'm pretty interested to see what happens with MASN this offseason, if anything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, interloper said:

From Roch's article this morning:

The Orioles announced yesterday that executive vice president and chief operating officer Greg Bader has been promoted to executive vice president and general manager of MASN.

I'm sorry but in no way, shape, or matter is that a promotion.  He's been put out to pasture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/8/2024 at 5:38 PM, Baseball fandom said:

Look when DR ok the deals for Eflin and Jimenez that right there gave me hope that this will be much more  different than the JA days but will Elias continue to be conservative and hold this team back in making big moves . Yes he got Burnes great but that was for 1 year and didn't cost him a ton in his beloved prospects not money for that matter. 

What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.

Well it’s $25MM in additional payroll across 2024 and 2025, so it’s not peanuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • struggling teams? KC  had their Pitching one two lined up for us. Texas ? you might want to check that at the front door, they made a mess of Tampa before us. Do realy believe Tampa was embarrassed having scored one run butgave up 11? It's called closure. Thats what happened to us that last 2 years. So we did not win any games the last 2 years, so what? you would rather lose like we lost in '79? I do absolutly agree with on JH andthe unspoken Mayo. Nothing short of a disaster.
    • How about Mountcastle for Taylor Ward, straight up
    • Sign me up too. I realize “luck” is a loaded term. Maybe something like “great timing” or “excellent sequencing” or “finding the holes when it really counts” would sound better. Either way, that’s what’s happening. I’m all ears for a different explanation that demonstrates how the Tigers suddenly became a top 4-8 team in MLB, but I don’t think one exists. This is a team that led MLB in ERA (2.75) from 8/15 on, outpitching their xFIP (3.83) by over a run. They likely did so by ranking extremely high in each of the major indicators of unsustainable pitching success: .249 BABIP (2nd in MLB), 77.1% strand rate (4th in MLB), 8.9% HR/FB rate (3rd in MLB).  They actually didn’t really hit that well during that span (15th in wRC+ and 15th in runs), but even those mediocre outcomes were inflated by their good “timing” and “aim.” They had a .315 BABIP (3rd in MLB), despite not hitting the ball hard (21st in HH% and 25th in barrels). They had the aforementioned sky-high whiff (26th) and K (27th) rates. They didn’t really hurt you on the basepaths (27th in SBs, 14th in BsR). What they were pretty good at (surprise, surprise) was hitting with runners on base and in scoring position. We know all too well how sustainable that is. What they are, really, is akin to the 2012 Orioles. A few genuinely really good players, some up-and-coming talents — and a bunch of nobodies playing out of their minds filling in the gaps. Fun story, good group of guys. They had more playoff success than this current team has had. But no one who knows talent would trade the 2023-24 Orioles for the 2012 team. And the same is true of trading the Orioles roster for the Tigers. Talent is what matters in the long haul, not short term heaters or slumps. EDIT: Sorry, just circle-jerking over here about the “talent.”
    • I think people are mixing 2 different ideas here. Listen, if the Tigers luck their way to a WS championship, by all means sign me up for that.  I didn't begrudge TEX winning it last year and I won't begrudge DET winning it this year.  Saying a team is having good luck isn't an insult, it's just the way it is. But which team do I think has a greater chance of making the playoffs again next year?  Ours, and it's not very close.
    • Fredi has a catcher's background. Maybe there was a disagreement with coaching there. Totally speculating. 
    • Or just bring in one great hitting coach and get rid of the other half of the siamese twin.   The 2 man concept is fine if one of them has a tired arm from throwing too much batting practice.
    • Unfortunately for John Middleton, he doesn't have anything better to do now than talk about how he'll be in the Juan Soto bidding all winter. That could affect the 2025 Phillies need for Hays. He'll be an interesting one to watch come the non-tender deadline.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...