Jump to content

Elias on contract extensions


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Jagwar said:

Extend Gunnar. That's it. Hold off on any other players until they earn it. If Elias gets the go ahead to really increase payroll, sign Burnes, a high leverage BP piece and a MOO.

What more does Westburg have to do to "earn" it?

Learn to get his hand out of the of the ball?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

What more does Westburg have to do to "earn" it?

Learn to get his hand out of the of the ball?

Gunnar had an OPS 100 points higher in each of the last two years. His fWAR for the last two years was 8.0/4.7 compared to Westburg's 2.8/1.0 (Yes in fewer games). I like Westburg a lot and I'm glad he's an Oriole. But he's not (yet) in the same class as Gunnar Henderson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jagwar said:

Gunnar had an OPS 100 points higher in each of the last two years. His fWAR for the last two years was 8.0/4.7 compared to Westburg's 2.8/1.0 (Yes in fewer games). I like Westburg a lot and I'm glad he's an Oriole. But he's not (yet) in the same class as Gunnar Henderson.

i wasn't suggesting we give them both the same deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jagwar said:

So what type of deal do you think each player warrants?

I'm crap with numbers and it's been a rough night so I'm not even going to try.

I'd give Gunnar a Witt-like deal and Westburg something more reasonable with more protections for the club.

I think if you can get Westburg locked up to something with reasonable terms it's a good idea to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm crap with numbers and it's been a rough night so I'm not even going to try.

I'd give Gunnar a Witt-like deal and Westburg something more reasonable with more protections for the club.

I think if you can get Westburg locked up to something with reasonable terms it's a good idea to do it.

I agree with you on Gunnar. I'd wait on Westburg until he puts up a Gunnar like season, and spend money on Burnes this offseason.

Oh and do something temporary to bring the RF wall in 10-15 feet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jagwar said:

I agree with you on Gunnar. I'd wait on Westburg until he puts up a Gunnar like season, and spend money on Burnes this offseason.

Oh and do something temporary to bring the RF wall in 10-15 feet

So if Westburg ends up being a very good but not MVP level player you aren't interesting in extending him at a team friendly rate?

I disagree with your strategy.

If you can lock up even a young 3 win player at a team friendly rate I say do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only ones I’d look to extend now are Gunnar, and maybe Holliday or Basallo. Premium defensive positions and young enough to not worry about going past their primes. Westburg would need to be a team friendly deal as he’s older and I wonder if we’re getting his best years now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eddie83 said:

The decision is not up to Elias. It’s up to Rubenstein. It’s all on him. 
 

I doubt if Gunnar was signed longterm Mike would throw a fit about it. 

This makes no sense. Of course Elias & the baseball operations team would have some say in who gets extended, and who shouldn't. Rubenstein has control of the payroll budget Elias would need to work within, and final say on the extension and it's value.

I'd assume Elias wouldn't want to extend Gunnar for a price that wouldn't allow for a winning roster to be built around him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's some word salad for sure. Don't really expect any GM to come out and say "WE'RE BACKING UP THE DUMP TRUCK FULL OF CASH AS WE SPEAK". 

Gunnar is the only one really worthy of an early extension IMO. Maybe Westburg. Adley is a bucket of red flags right now, as is Grayson with his recurring injury. No one else has really performed to warrant an extension. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you have to do your due diligence on extending Gunnar, Westburg and Cowser. Obviously they all 3 would get very different deals. Gunnar offered a deal close to what Witt got, Westburg and Cowser something a good bit less than that in aav and length.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, interloper said:

 

Gunnar is the only one really worthy of an early extension IMO. Maybe Westburg. Adley is a bucket of red flags right now, as is Grayson with his recurring injury. No one else has really performed to warrant an extension. 

Agree but both Gunnar and Westy are represented by you know who so I'm not getting my pants all wet waiting for an extension to happen. More interested in how Elias will construct next year's team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, SteveA said:

Double hedge:

1) "responsible attempt" 

2) IF it is in the best interests of building the team

Both obviously true and impossible to find fault with as stated, but both also obviously deliberately inserted in the sentence as hedges to explain, after the fact, why we failed to extend any of our younger players beyond their original team control period.   

Either there are stronger fiscal restraints still in place than people would like to believe, or else Elias really doesn't believe extending team talent and buying free agent years is the way to go, even though lots of the other cool kids have been doing it, including Houston with Altuve, Tampa, Cleveland, Philly, and other franchises.

Well … only certain guys should get these early long extensions. Gunnar is probably one of them. If Boras’ demands are reasonable a deal could get done. But, perhaps his response to an overture is not reasonable which shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm kind of with you on this. Everything just feels like a crap shoot.  KC went and bought a bunch of 5th starters last offseason and might mess around and eliminate the top 2 AL East teams. 
    • With our second season of postseason futility behind us a number of posts have been made about the need for "players with postseason experience" to variously "calm, lead, guide, motivate," the younger players.  I've often suspected that this [postseason experience] is a much-overblown quality to guide our player acquisition efforts.  I realize the postseason, notably the World Series, is a mighty big stage on which to perform, but, between high school, college, and the minors, most of these players have played in some pretty big games under some significant pressure.   I finally ran across a data-driven article that set out to answer this question.  Published in 2002 in The Baseball Research Journal, Tom Hanrahan concludes it doesn't matter:   "Do baseball players fare better in the post-season when they have post-season experience behind them?  My research says the answer is a clear no.  Managers' efforts to build teams with players who 'have been there before' appear to be fruitless ventures, sacrificing money and possibly quality for no apparent gain.'"  What say you?  Is Hanrahan right?  Or is he all wet and the Orioles should go out and hire some wiley veterans who've "been there before" to get them over the hump?   https://sabr.org/journal/article/does-experience-help-in-the-postseason/#:~:text=Do baseball players fare better,quality for no apparent gain.
    • I disagree with your conclusion but I'm appropriating this line over the next couple of weeks:  "mega religious Lego playing softie white bread error machines."   🤣
    • What is crazy is that Soto won't be 26 for another couple of weeks.  Guy has been an absolute force on offense for 7 seasons already and he is almost a year younger than Adley.  There is always risk tied to the back end of big contracts, but I would hate to constantly pass on players like this just because we are always afraid of the next Chris Davis (who really fell off the cliff in his age 32 season).  I don't think we will be in play for a Soto type player anyhow, and I certainly understand that management has to focus on finances and the budgets. But as a fan, all I care about is winning games and October success. Whether the Os have a payroll of $50 million, $150 million, or $500 million, I really don't care as long as they bring a championship to Baltimore.  Flags fly forever.  
    • Is Britt the only good MLB journo at this point? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...