Jump to content

Would you say that the Tigers rebuild is more successful than the O's?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Put the Tigers in the AL East and they don't even make the playoffs. Let alone two years running.

Had we won 4 of 6 against them instead of losing 4 of 6, they finish with 84 wins and Seattle takes their spot.  

They did go 20-12 (0.625) against the AL East this year, which is pretty solid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s obvious that success, at least short term success, isn’t just having talent, but using it effectively.

The Os remade their infrastructure, and made it possible to maintain a steady influx of players. But now the pipeline is set up, the Os need to evaluate talent, develop it well, and finally, use it effectively, both on the field and as trade capital. 
That has been pretty successful so far, with some glaring exceptions, but overall it all remains to be seen.

The Tigers have had some luck, of course, but as they say,”we make our own luck.”

 But mainly, AJ Hinch is using his talent effectively, and that means a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. I think their record is more a function of their division. And I'm on record of saying they are very good and didn't want to face them in the playoffs. But they would not have the same amount of success in our division, tbh. I'd take our roster, farm system, and org over theirs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

The Tigers were 20-12 vs AL East

Losing record against winning clubs, get to face the White Sox 13 times a year (10-3). they did do well against the East, but a 32 game sample outside division against the East vs. in division, which they had a losing record against everybody not named the White Sox, speaks volumes. 

I do they think they're a very good team from a pitching standpoint. I think their offense is pretty mid, but excellent pitching, defense can hold up a so-so offense. 

Edited by LookitsPuck
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Well that’s great and all…but really isn’t what matters is that you have those guys here anyway?

Maybe Bradish is that guy..but he got hurt.

Maybe GRod will be that guy…but he’s had injury issues.

And Btw, Skubal has had injury issues for most of his career too.

It’s hard to luck into a Skubal guy and have them be healthy.

I just hope they have some really good pitchers who stay healthy.  

I don't think we have Burnes here anymore, but we'll see.

These guys all get hurt.  That wasn't the point, really...but we all hope that they have good pitchers that can stay healthy, an increasingly unlikely scenario in MLB as we head into 2025.

Skubal has had injury issues, yes.  But I'd still like for Elias to have a guy like that come through the system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I don't think we have Burnes here anymore, but we'll see.

These guys all get hurt.  That wasn't the point, really...but we all hope that they have good pitchers that can stay healthy, an increasingly unlikely scenario in MLB as we head into 2025.

Skubal has had injury issues, yes.  But I'd still like for Elias to have a guy like that come through the system.

I would too…but again, Bradish and GRod could be that.

The point in bringing up Burnes is we “lucked” into that guy for 2024. It didn’t work out in terms of winning in October. Lots of teams with high level starters don’t make the playoffs or see those starters fail in the postseason.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I don't think we have Burnes here anymore, but we'll see.

These guys all get hurt.  That wasn't the point, really...but we all hope that they have good pitchers that can stay healthy, an increasingly unlikely scenario in MLB as we head into 2025.

Skubal has had injury issues, yes.  But I'd still like for Elias to have a guy like that come through the system.

Does it matter if they get drafted and developed vs. traded for and developed?

Hell, the O's starting rotation was a strength this year. Here's a breakdown of how it was constructed:

  • Burnes - traded for (Elias)
  • Suarez - free agent (Elias)
  • Kremer - traded for (Duquette)
  • Eflin - traded for (Elias)
  • Grayson - drafted (Duquette)
  • Bradish - traded for (Elias)
  • Povich - traded for (Elias)
  • Irvin - traded for (Elias)
  • Tyler Wells - Rule V (Elias)
  • Rogers - traded for (Elias)
  • McDermott - traded for (Elias)
  • Means - drafted (Duquette)

I'm excluding Bowman being an opener and getting a starting credit. 

But that said, out of all of the starters that the O's used this year, none were drafted by Elias, and only 2 were drafted by the O's (GRod, Means). 8 were acquired via trade (7 by Elias, 1 by Duquette), and 2 via FA or Rule V. 

I don't necessarily think that Elias needs to draft starters to build a rotation, but it would be nice to see a couple make it before being traded, TBH. 

That said, I don't think the above is sustainable, but the strategy would be sustainable if you have free agency play a bigger part. Look at the Royals. Their best 3 starters weren't drafted by them (Ragans - traded for, Wacha - FA, Lugo - FA). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

Losing record against winning clubs, get to face the White Sox 13 times a year (10-3). they did do well against the East, but a 32 game sample outside division against the East vs. in division, which they had a losing record against everybody not named the White Sox, speaks volumes. 

I do they think they're a very good team from a pitching standpoint. I think their offense is pretty mid, but excellent pitching, defense can hold up a so-so offense. 

3 of the 4 AL teams remaining are from the Central.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

3 of the 4 AL teams remaining are from the Central.

Oh, I get that. I just think you'd be hard pressed to say year in and year out the Central is anything but a mediocre division. 

Typically, the AL East has at least 3 strong teams, with some seasons where 4-5 of them have winning records or close to it. 

But it doesn't matter. As said before, I've been saying for weeks prior to the end of the season that the Tigers were a very good team. I just wouldn't trade our org, team, farm, whatever for the Tigers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LookitsPuck said:

 

I don't necessarily think that Elias needs to draft starters to build a rotation, but it would be nice to see a couple make it before being traded, TBH. 

 

Paging @Tony-OH to the thread.  🤣

I've actually advocated for this in the minors forums...letting other teams draft and try to develop guys to see which have a shot of sticking and which don't.  Essentially let other teams make mistakes in the draft and trade for guys that are still in the lower levels in other systems but you think have a shot.  I do believe that's part of Elias's strategy....as risk adverse as he is, he's not going to take risks on drafting pitching if he views that's the biggest risk in the draft.

All I'm saying it'd be nice to have a Skubal come through our system.  Does anyone really disagree with drafting and developing a Cy Young winner or is that something you guys aren't interested in?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Paging @Tony-OH to the thread.  🤣

I've actually advocated for this in the minors forums...letting other teams draft and try to develop guys to see which have a shot of sticking and which don't.  Essentially let other teams make mistakes in the draft and trade for guys that are still in the lower levels in other systems but you think have a shot.  I do believe that's part of Elias's strategy....as risk adverse as he is, he's not going to take risks on drafting pitching if he views that's the biggest risk in the draft.

All I'm saying it'd be nice to have a Skubal come through our system.  Does anyone really disagree with drafting and developing a Cy Young winner or is that something you guys aren't interested in?

Oh, I'd love to have one come through our system by being drafted and developed. No doubt at all. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I miss the "Throwin' Swannanoan".......  
    • So what do the Rays do?   Spend a lot of money fixing the roof for the few remaining years that ballpark has left?   Or do like the A's and play in a minor league facility until their new ballpark is built? I wonder if they could work out something with the Yankees to play in Steinbrenner Field.   It is in Tampa and one of the nicer spring training facilities on the Gulf Coast.   The Rays train in Port Charlotte which is (50???) miles south and I don't think the facility is nearly as good.   Steinbrenner FIeld seats over 10K, has luxury boxes, and a very accessible location for Tampa area fans.  
    • Javy Baez has been on 5 playoff teams including a World Series winner and an LCS team.  128 postseason plate appearances. Mark Canha has been on 5 playoff teams and has 54 postseason plate appearances. Gio Urshela has been on 4 playoff teams and in an LCS and has 88 postseason plate appearances. Those 3 guys may not be big postseason contributors right now but that doesn't mean they aren't providing some amount of leadership by example.   They did have 1000 PAs among them this year for the Tigers.
    • Of course the question asked in that article doesn't really directly answer what a lot of people are talking about. No one is saying we want to have a roster full of guys with experience. But some have suggested that have a team almost completely devoid of guys who have had postseason success, might lead to a bunch of young players who lack role models and mentors and leaders who can help them the first time they face the pressure of the postseason, which really is a totally different animal than the 162 game regular season grind. Anecdotally, there are many guys from the 1966 Orioles (which was a pretty young team) who talked about how Frank came in and "taught us how to win". Anecdotally, back in the days of the "Oriole way", players talked about coming into the organization and learning from veterans how to conduct yourself and how to play the game the right way.   It's hard to have that when you have a total gutting/rebuild of a franchise.    Anecdotally, in the book Astroball, which I read quite a few years ago but I think I remember this part, they talked about the front office coming to the realization that they needed to bring in some veteran leadership, and specifically targeting Carlos Beltran for that reason. Maybe the anecdotes are BS.   Maybe guys just make up narratives after something is successful.   But these ARE human beings, not just a sequence of stats and numbers.   It makes sense that, especially with young players who have never dealt with failure much, the pressure of the postseason could become an isssue and it might be nice to have some wise old heads to lean on. We have a core of young players who have basically been eagerly awaited by fans, told that they are the basis of the next winning franchise, and greeted with adulation.   They came into a team that had minimal veteran leadership and no postseason experience.   They are managed by a manager who has been a coach on winning teams but has never managed in the postseason before.   They have hitting coaches who were hired because of their ability to promote a hitting philosophy and modern coaching techniques that the organization believes are optimal, but who have never coached major league players before in any capacity. Our core players are trying to figure out how to be major leaguers with far less guidance than people who have been there, than perhaps any group of young players ever.   They may be getting excellent instruction and swing analysis and data that will help them hit better, but they have no one who has been through the mental and physical and emotional  tribulations of being a young player in the majors and triumphed, to serve as an example as they try to grown into superstars and champions. In previous seasons, before "liftoff", we brought in guys like Frazier and Chirinos specifically to serve as veteran role modeals, and were able to do so because all the MLB pieces weren't in place yet and there were roster spots available.   Now those spots aren't available, and if we bring in someone for veteranosity they are also going to have to be good enough to play on a championship team.   Harder to find those guys of course.   But I wouldn't dismiss the need altogether.
    • It sounds like it was bad but perhaps not as bad as they thought it would be. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...