Jump to content

The Once and Future Billy Rowell


nyco

Recommended Posts

What on Earth happened to this guy?

Overhyped? Overwhelmed? I remember when we drafted him, everyone was saying he was a David Wright clone.

Help me out here. Am I too hasty in writing him off (not that I'm doing that).

Or are we all slightly bummed by the whole thing and moving on with our lives?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply
What on Earth happened to this guy?

Overhyped? Overwhelmed? I remember when we drafted him, everyone was saying he was a David Wright clone.

Help me out here. Am I too hasty in writing him off (not that I'm doing that).

Or are we all slightly bummed by the whole thing and moving on with our lives?

Looks like he's just not panning out, for whatever reason. There have been questions about attitude and work ethic.

I'm not sure if you're too hasty in writing him off. He's still young so I don't think his book can be written just yet. However, the door is closing on him and things aren't looking good. He was off to a good start this year and has cooled considerably.

I don't think many people are bummed considering Snyder is killing it, Matusz looks great and Wieters dominated before being promoted.

Had this guy been labeled our savior or something, things might be different. I've written him off, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive written him off as well, to me he does not have the bat that was originally advertised. I dunno if that is because his swing was tinkered with so much that he lost his way or he just didnt develop the way expected, his swing is apparently long and slow, though he was rated as having good bat speed. Of course he is 20 Year old, but his fairy tale is about ended.....We havent taken a HS bat since then and I dunno if JJ ever will again in the 1st round unless its a cant miss kinda guy....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Big Easy

I wouldn't write him off just yet. He's still young, and that light could turn on at any time. Also, keep in my mind that he has switched positions several times since he was in high school. Not only is he trying to learn how to hit a curveball, but how to play another new position as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not ready to give up on the kid yet. The luster has worn off to some degree certainly. Maybe a demotion is a good thing, but maybe not. I'm sure his confidence is shaken and a demotion may just do more harm than good. Maybe a "minor injury" will require a few days off and a trip to the GCL or Bluefield when their season begins. Though a demotion, if he takes it in stride, would allow him to compete against players his own age. Tough call.

He may just need to get his head clear and take the pressure off himself for a bit. He seems like a high maintenance kid who needs some success to get it headed back in the right direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See Montanez before Orioles before you write him off.

I think comparing him to Montanez would be writing him off.

And yeah, I have zero confidence that he ever makes the bigs. I know, I know, he's young for his league. That excuse was fine last season, but he's at the same level this season, and is performing worse. He's also lost some of his positional value with the outfield switch.

Other than the Britton pick in the 4th round and the Berken pick in the 6th round, that 2006 draft is looking brutal for the Birds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive written him off as well, to me he does not have the bat that was originally advertised. I dunno if that is because his swing was tinkered with so much that he lost his way or he just didnt develop the way expected, his swing is apparently long and slow, though he was rated as having good bat speed. Of course he is 20 Year old, but his fairy tale is about ended.....We havent taken a HS bat since then and I dunno if JJ ever will again in the 1st round unless its a cant miss kinda guy....

Bats are -College or HS- traditionally the best bet to become productive ML'ers. Jordan won't be precluded from taking a HS kid in R1 because Rowell hasn't developed as hoped... just yet.

Here's one thought among many...

Most 20 year-olds would just now be finishing up their sophomore year in college. If we took a draft-eligible sophomore and he was struggling at Advanced A-ball, but showed promise... would we/should we "write him off"?

We have posters who are too quick to judgment, and while obviously it would surprise said posters, what if... just what if... Billy Rowell straightened out his swing and in two seasons, at 22 years-old, showed that his once bright prospect star is still high in the sky? Is it a foregone conclusion that he cannot rebound? Could he just possibly be the player we thought we drafted, but he was mishandled, or resistant to change, or, or, or...? Could he in two years time, at a still very young 22, hit .300, crack 20+ HR's and post an 850+OPS at AA Bowie? Would anyone bet their house he's incapable of this?

He may be a bust, he may rebound in a big way, or maybe he falls somewhere in between... but he's awfully young, and I'm willing to give Rowell the time he needs to get it figured out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think comparing him to Montanez would be writing him off.

And yeah, I have zero confidence that he ever makes the bigs. I know, I know, he's young for his league. That excuse was fine last season, but he's at the same level this season, and is performing worse. He's also lost some of his positional value with the outfield switch.

Other than the Britton pick in the 4th round and the Berken pick in the 6th round, that 2006 draft is looking brutal for the Birds.

I understand your take, but I think it's a little early to judge just yet. I think in two years or so, the 2006 draft will be seen as a solid one. Beato and Rowell are struggling, but they are far from done. Blake Davis may yet be a solid ML reserve INF. Britton may well be the star of that draft in a few years. Ryan Adams and Tyler Henson are also far from done. They're solid bats, especially Adams, who has been hurt this year. I believe if you can get 2-3 MLers out of a draft, then you have success. Berken, Britton and Adams seem to be on track, and if Beato, Rowell or Henson figure things out then we are ahead of the game. There isn't much left after the top seven picks, though.

With Jordan's draft philosophy, other than Wieters and Matusz, it is all about a development process...and it takes time. He's going to miss some with the more raw higher ceiling kids, but when they make it we'll get better performance on the field than the usual mediocre last place birds we've come to know over the last decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bats are -College or HS- traditionally the best bet to become productive ML'ers. Jordan won't be precluded from taking a HS kid in R1 because Rowell hasn't developed as hoped... just yet.

Here's one thought among many...

Most 20 year-olds would just now be finishing up their sophomore year in college. If we took a draft-eligible sophomore and he was struggling at Advanced A-ball, but showed promise... would we/should we "write him off"?

We have posters who are too quick to judgment, and while obviously it would surprise said posters, what if... just what if... Billy Rowell straightened out his swing and in two seasons, at 22 years-old, showed that his once bright prospect star is still high in the sky? Is it a foregone conclusion that he cannot rebound? Could he just possibly be the player we thought we drafted, but he was mishandled, or resistant to change, or, or, or...? Could he in two years time, at a still very young 22, hit .300, crack 20+ HR's and post an 850+OPS at AA Bowie? Would anyone bet their house he's incapable of this?

He may be a bust, he may rebound in a big way, or maybe he falls somewhere in between... but he's awfully young, and I'm willing to give Rowell the time he needs to get it figured out.

Fair enough. Now answer me this...if he were a draft eligible college sophomore and not already in our system...given his current performance and projection based thereon....

Where would he have been drafted, if at all, this year in a weak hitters draft?

I am not sure he would have been drafted at all, but you guys are the draft gurus around here. IMO if he wouldnt have been drafted, then he is a bust already that we just hope to salvage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair enough. Now answer me this...if he were a draft eligible college sophomore and not already in our system...given his current performance and projection based thereon....

Where would he have been drafted, if at all, this year in a weak hitters draft?

I am not sure he would have been drafted at all, but you guys are the draft gurus around here. IMO if he wouldnt have been drafted, then he is a bust already that we just hope to salvage.

It's difficult to say what sort of numbers he would have put up in college. Being a former 1st round talent, ML teams would keep close tabs on him. But he would fall completely out of the top five rounds or so, if he were batting .228. But again, two different animals... college and pro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • It's been a couple months, let's check in on where things sit. Tony's ranking in parentheses: Locks: 1. Coby Mayo (3) - Stud. He won't need to wait till the winter. 2. Cade Povich (5) - Bad start last night but 3.85 xFIP in AAA this year, he's looked really good. 3. Chayce McDermott (8): 14.36 K/9 in Norfolk but 5.74 BB/9 too.  4. Connor Norby (10): .386 wOBA, .309 xwOBA this year - I'm not a fan but he still gets added More Likely Than Not: 5. Brandon Young (26): The move to Norfolk proves they think he's for real. He has the best xFIP in the org (2.17) He hasn't thrown 5 innings in an outing yet though. They're still being cautious with him. 6. Kade Strowd (20): 2.88 xFIP and got bumped to Norfolk. He has a real shot to get added. He could be bullpen depth this year even. Other Names to Watch: Trey McGough - LHP, got bumped to Norfolk. 3.78 xFIP there so far. Luis Gonzalez - 32 year old Mexican league find like Suarez, Cesar Valdez, Miguel Gonzalez, but he'll get a cup of coffee this year the way he's pitching. 3.43 xFIP in 22 IP inNorfolk. Maverick Handley - .246/.357/.396 in Norfolk and reportedly has a strong arm. Do they trade for Blake Hunt if they like Handley to replace McCann next year?  Nick Richmond - Strong numbers in Bowie to start the year, 3.34 xFIP Eligible, but Not Playing Well Enough for Consideration: Hudson Haskin, Billy Cook, Justin Armbreuster, Keagan Gillies, John Rhodes, Carter Baumler, Kyle Brnovich, Moises Chace, Wandisson Charles, Carlos Tavera
    • Elias has so many factors to contemplate in consideration of trade acquisitions.  Among them is how he foresees the 2025 roster (and beyond) and whether trading a player or prospect away will affect that roster.  Luzardo would fit in very well, as we'd have him this year and two more, helping to offset the loss of Burnes after this season. Is it potentially worth losing six years of control of multiple prospects?  It was worth losing Ortiz and Hall and all their years of control for one season of Burnes.  Such considerations make for an interesting aspect of determining who to target and knowing what your max offer would be.  Being on the same page with the other team's GM may still find you on the outside looking in if another team ups their offer enough to outbid you. I'd be in heaven to be able to be with Elias as he has these conversations and to see how he views things. 
    • Randy Arozarena is another example of the surprise and unpredictability of the game. In his breakout years of 2019-2020, he had pretty scary stats, albeit with limited plate appearances. High average, and OPS+ of 135 and 182 respectively. Yikes! Since then, he's had 3 full ML years under his belt -- 2021, 2022 and 2023. He got slightly worse each year according to OPS+ (129, 123, 120) but that's not a huge backslide. 2022 was a big doubles year for him, then in 2023 he hit more home runs and fewer doubles. Last year he was a .254 hitter with 23 home runs, 19 doubles and 3 triples. With a 120 OPS+, he's still a major league piece you would want in a lineup. Then there's this year. In 230 PA -- about a third of a season -- he has shown a huge dropoff in hits. He's on pace to get about the same number of doubles and home runs as last year, but about 50 fewer hits. His OPS+ is half of last year's, and worse than ML average at 65. In recent years, he's been a batter I've dreaded to see at the plate against the O's. But this year, he's showing signs of Chris Davis syndrome with the batting average falling off a cliff. Perhaps not coincidentally, the Rays are not where they'd like to be at this point in the season with a losing record. Baseball is weird.
    • Love Cole Irvin as the guy who can move around a pitching staff and I'd be fine with him as the 4th/5th starter.   If you can get a guy and bump him into the spot starter/long man role, he will benefit this team more.
    • The #RisingTide doesn't stop when it starts inundating higher value MLB careers. It is an important decision for the Orioles to get right how many from 0-4 out of Heston Kjerstad, Coby Mayo, Jackson Holliday and Samuel Basallo ought to appear in an October 2024 lineup.     This is likely the singular season Corbin Burnes and Samuel Basallo can contribute cWPA to Baltimore. With about half the year to year player fluctuations and injury results in view, you can kind of MadLib the Orioles old outfielders that might still be unconstrained starters on other contenders with LF-CF-RF WAA weaknesses, and a medium strong middle reliever on those teams where maybe there is a 2024 balanced Bat for Arm situation. RF Santander back to Cleveland for Scott Barlow? CF Mullins to LA Dodgers for Daniel Hudson and/or Blake Treinen? LF Hays to Minnesota for Jorge Alcala?
    • IMHO there is close to a zero chance the O's would deal Mayo for Luzardo.  I have doubts we'd trade for him at all, but especially when names like Mayo come up.  Holliday, Mayo, and Basallo are top tier prospects (and Kjerstad is another highly rated one) but Luzardo, while very good, is not worth a top tier prospect, yet.  If he stays healthy and looks great, that could change, but even then, not for our Top 3.  If the Marlins could net Kjerstad in their package I'd call that a win for them, but his inclusion also seems unlikely. To be clear, I'd love to add Luzardo, but like most trade ideas, what we'd give up would have to be agreeable.
    • The very concept is baffling  You are supposed to hit a round ball with an oblong bat and hit it Square.  That is very hard to do  No wonder only a very small % of people on the planet can do it very good.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...