Jump to content

Cubs, M's swap Milton Bradley for Carlos Silva


CrimsonTribe

Recommended Posts

How do you guys see this from a Cubs perspective? Most Cubs fans are pretty upset and I can't say I blame them. Carlos Silva is a tough pill to swallow.

There is a little bit of financial releif, but it really only boils down to about 5 million over 2 years. It doesn't even pay for the crappy contract we just gave out to John Grabow.

Most Cubs fans feel like a laughing stock after this deal. Agree?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you guys see this from a Cubs perspective? Most Cubs fans are pretty upset and I can't say I blame them. Carlos Silva is a tough pill to swallow.

There is a little bit of financial releif, but it really only boils down to about 5 million over 2 years. It doesn't even pay for the crappy contract we just gave out to John Grabow.

Most Cubs fans feel like a laughing stock after this deal. Agree?

Bad move. Bad move. Bad move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you guys see this from a Cubs perspective? Most Cubs fans are pretty upset and I can't say I blame them. Carlos Silva is a tough pill to swallow.

There is a little bit of financial releif, but it really only boils down to about 5 million over 2 years. It doesn't even pay for the crappy contract we just gave out to John Grabow.

Most Cubs fans feel like a laughing stock after this deal. Agree?

Channeling my inner Cub's fan tells me that at the beginning of last year, I was enthralled to have the kind of numbers Bradley put up with the Rangers in 2008, playing on my beloved Cubbies. But when the wheels began to fall off midway through the year, Bradley became the poster boy for everything that was wrong.

Removing this cancer from the clubhouse was paramount to any other move the 2010 Cubs would have to make, regardless of who was coming back to us!

As fans of player 'X', we often find it difficult to separate the stats they put up from the personality itself and the destructive properties it may possess. Milton Bradley may be a quality player with a solid, middle-of-the-order bat, but his thermonuclear demeanor has soured a lot of GM's, players and fans alike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is an absolutely beautiful move by the Mariners.

Good move if you like poison. You guys must like trouble. Either that or you think everything is numbers.

Way, way back before the Wall St. meltdown took his title away, this guy was the original Toxic Asset.

The M's will regret this. Every team does. We just don't know exactly how long it's gonna take.

When that happens, I wonder which GM will be dumb enough to be next in line...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good move if you like poison. You guys must like trouble. Either that or you think everything is numbers.

Way, way back before the Wall St. meltdown took his title away, this guy was the original Toxic Asset.

The M's will regret this. Every team does. We just don't know exactly how long it's gonna take.

When that happens, I wonder which GM will be dumb enough to be next in line...

It absolutely is a game of numbers. Chicago did poorly last season not because Milton Bradley is a nutcase but rather because he forgot how to hit for power, the starting rotation was hit with injuries, and Soriano, Soto, and Fontenot had awful seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my opinion, the only con here for the Mariners is that they'll likely have Bradley for 2 years. When a team gets on the cusp like they are, in that division, the time is right to make calculated risks. While Bradley could drag the entire team down the toilet, he could also lead them to a pennant.

Very high risk, VERY high reward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Mariners will be sorry when they lose Bradley after he breaks his leg in an argument with the hot dog vendor who gave him ketchup when he didn't ask for it.

Getting a hot dog while he is supposed to be playing defense? What is he a Ravens defensive back???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • I get where you are coming from. I guess I should have clarified. I wasn't referring to "runs created" in terms of how the official stat is measured. I was using it in the context of the player being at bat or on base when someone actually crosses home plate.  I agree that it requires opportunity. But it also matters what you do with the set of opportunities that you are given. I think that it is more than a function of randomness or luck, but that it is actually a skill. But overall I agree with your point, especially the bolded.
    • I would refute one of the OP takes that bat control doesn't exist anymore.  The bat control OP is talking about may have fallen off, though I would point that those players still exist, see Arraez and Kwan.  But players have taken bat control to the next level, in that they now create swing planes to control launch angles, and make adjustments to the field they are hitting to, or to squeeze Evo out of the swing.  This stuff surely happened back in the day, they just didn't have statcast data to back it up. But the level of bat control and swing shaping now is beyond next level.
    • Heard an interesting theory this morning: The Umpires' Union has offered up Angel Hernandez as a sacrificial lamb in order to get MLB to back off their plans to eventually go to an automated strike zone. If MLB all of a sudden finds lots of reasons to delay or cancel the roll out of robo-umps we'll know why. 
    • It's worth a watch. They argue that, based on the info available, Hernandez has never been close to being the worst ump, and has even at times been above average (not so much in recent years though).
    • Agree. I don’t think the Orioles have a set time when they think he’ll be back. I think getting past Super 2 is relevant but not required. Beyond that, he also only had 2 weeks of service earlier, so I believe he could be a September 1 callup with expanded rosters and still have rookie status next year. But it doesn’t make sense to keep him down once they think he’s ready and if (when) Mateo cools off. That could be in a couple weeks or as late as September, we’ll just have to see. 
    • The year Tejada had 150 RBI, I believe he had both the most runners on base of any batter, and the highest OPS with runners on base (.970) of any batter.  So, it was a combination of opportunity and performance.   This year, in 221 PA Adley has batted with 121 runners on base; the average batter with 221 PA would have 132 runners on base.  So, Adley’s opportunities aren’t exceptionally high.  He has a .907 OPS with RISP and .938 with runners on.  So, his RBI total has been more about performance than opportunity.    
    • He is making adjustments, but I'm not sure any of us can say when he will be back. Mateo is playing well at 2B right now and while we know that typically doesn't last with the bat, I don't think the Orioles feel a rush to bring him back up the second he starts doing well. He could be back up by July, or he may not be back until September. It just really depends on how he's doing and the Orioles need at 2B.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...