Jump to content

Daniel Klein- 3rd Round- RHP UCLA


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Only 3 pitches are likely to be usable. Couple that with injury history... that is why I was tossing out Chris Ray.

Well even if he only uses 3 pitches, that's 2 more than Ray had and Ray didn't have good command.

So, I don't see how the comp works outside of them being relievers who throw right handed.

This sounds like a pick Minnesota would make....and that's not a bad thing for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well even if he only uses 3 pitches, that's 2 more than Ray had and Ray didn't have good command.

So, I don't see how the comp works outside of them being relievers who throw right handed.

This sounds like a pick Minnesota would make....and that's not a bad thing for us.

I agree. The change and fastball movement both sound very nice. Coupled with a hard slider, command and a good build, and I like the pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How feasible is that giving asking price?

Jordan said he expects to spend more than last year. Even if you pay him $2-2.5 mil on top of the $6 you spend on Machado, without a supplemental or a 2nd you are still doing pretty well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well even if he only uses 3 pitches, that's 2 more than Ray had and Ray didn't have good command.

So, I don't see how the comp works outside of them being relievers who throw right handed.

This sounds like a pick Minnesota would make....and that's not a bad thing for us.

But what did the write-up of Ray say when he was drafted. I guarantee you it didn't say he was a 1 pitch pitcher. Everyone looks stellar when they are drafted. Throw hard, hard worker etc and a few years later we don't see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But what did the write-up of Ray say when he was drafted. I guarantee you it didn't say he was a 1 pitch pitcher. Everyone looks stellar when they are drafted. Throw hard, hard worker etc and a few years later we don't see it.

In theory you could be right, but Jordan did draft this kid 2 years ago too. He obviously followed him and thinks he might be a good talent. I'm guessing signability could also be a factor based on a comment on another site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This guy's scouting reports remind me of Brian Matusz's: four average to above-average pitches, no overpowering fastball, good or better control. Now, he's right-handed, has somewhat weaker stuff in general, and a bunch of injury questions (and is therefore, for now, a reliever), but with right-handed Matusz upside he seems like a solid 3rd-rounder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • 1:2 is good.  Elite is a player like Arraez who is 1+:1.  
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...