Jump to content

How would YOU fix/improve the Orioles, going forward?


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

These sort of threads pop-up periodically... wherein we get to explore our views of the team and organization as a whole- with an eye on the current season, and as well toward the coming seasons. I believe most would agree that this team is simply not capable-as currently constructed-of contending. I, like many others, have been disappointed with management for years, but felt that this season should show that we could at least be competitive. Those thoughts, as per usual with this franchise, have been a mirage. At least that's how it seems now.

So... where do we go from here? What would you do this year and in the coming off-season, if you were called upon to make the decisions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I've been asking this question for the last couple weeks. "how......"

Start by trading Guthrie before the deadline. We need more talent in this organization.

Easier said than done but that could be step 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.) Wait until the trading deadline. If Vlad is still hitting, and Scott has rebounded, trade them both for pitching prospects.

2.) If Matusz,Britton, Arrietta are all pitching well at the deadline, deal Guthrie. Look for OF/3B/Pitching prospects.

3.) Go all in on the draft this year. If Cole or Rendon falls, then scoop them. If not, draft Starling. Overslot, overslot, overslot.

4.) Try and trade for Fielder with a guerenteed extension. If that fails, back up the truck to get him in the offseason.

5.) Rest Matt Wieters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing they can really do except bring in Simon-call up whoever is doing well in AAA to improve the bullpen. I dont think trading Vlad will do anything. We should hold on to him and offer arb. next year in hopes of getting a draft pick. Scott is in the midst of a horrendous slump. Little trade value here. Doubtful Guthrie will bring back anything but a flawed prospect if one even pans out. Much better to hold onto him. If anything, the O's should try and hype up Pie's athletic skills in hopes of getting a good player for him. Not sure how likely that is, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been a proponent of dealing Scott for sometime, so I'm all for it (pending a viable return.) Dealing Vlad would also be ideal (though getting picks this off-season could be possible).

I'd deal Guts also (pending a good return.)

No way I trade for Fielder, but I would go VERY HARD after him this off-season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the O's are out of things at the deadline definitely trade as many of Guthrie, Scott, Vlad, DLee, Gregg, Gonzo, etc. as you can to shore up the MiL rosters. I wouldn't count on much immediate ML help save a few RP's from that haul. Next fall we should be after Fielder in a big way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
    • Interesting. I had forgotten that they signed him and then got him in the pitching lab in the offseason. Since September is prior to the end of the season, I would take "two year contract" to mean September '23 is Year 1, and then '24 is Year 2.  That is a cool article. Very encouraging how closely they are following the KBO. 
    • I think most teams would want to have an MVP candidate at quarterback.   Most of the time this will mean that he is better than the guy they currently have.  That's why. My quote was not taking salary into account.  If you take his current salary into account I think you are still talking about a majority of the NFL teams that would take him right now.  If the salary is an issue you find a way to make it work.  I'm starting to come around to the idea that the salary cap is kinda fake in a way after I keep seeing teams do stuff like adding void years other trickery to get the guys they want.
    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...