Jump to content

We need Prince Fielder as much as any team needs a single player!


GoldGlove21

Recommended Posts

We're at least two more bats, two more legitimate major league pitchers, two more bullpen arms, and one speedy guy for stolen bases and the like to be even a relative contender.

I disagree with this assessment. If I'm the O's, I'm seriously considering keeping Guthrie and Hardy, hoping Roberts is healthy, throwing a ton of money at Fielder and banking on the starting pitching taking the next developmental step.

I don't think Matusz has suddenly washed up. He'll be a good pitcher for us unless he becomes chronically injured. Guthrie is a valuable pitcher. Britton is a bona fide starter and so is Arrieta. With Fielder, our only "hole" on offense (on paper) would be LF/DH. You're basically looking at a team that needs health and one good starting pitcher, in addition to Fielder, to give the fans some hope of winning.

I know it seems like we're terrible, but our offensive catalyst has missed most of the year, our supposed Ace has missed most of the year and been ineffective when he's been back, our power hitting left fielder has been injured and our 1B hasn't produced at all. With some luck (health), this team really could have been a .500 team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I'd give him a 6/$126M as an inital offer right out of the gate and make it known that it was my offer. Fan base gets to see the effort and it would let the agent look for a better offer. If he finds a better offer my last offer would be 6/$138M. I just don't see him getting $24M a year over a 6-year deal. I would be shocked to see him get a 7/$160M offer, but I think Boras uses Tex's contract as the starting point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With who? The point I am making is that you upgrade when you can. We need a great starter and a middle of the order bat. Fielder provides one, but we may not be able to address the other for another year. Does that mean you wait and try to get both in one offseason? What legit bat is there in 2013 or 2014?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd give him a 6/$126M as an inital offer right out of the gate and make it known that it was my offer. Fan base gets to see the effort and it would let the agent look for a better offer. If he finds a better offer my last offer would be 6/$138M. I just don't see him getting $24M a year over a 6-year deal. I would be shocked to see him get a 7/$160M offer, but I think Boras uses Tex's contract as the starting point.

Ok, I say there is zero chance that gets him.

You want Fielder? You want to be serious about getting him to Baltimore? If you are, then you have to go into the negotations willing to put SEVEN years on the table at least 22 million a year...If you aren't willing to at least commit to that contract, then don't bother negotiating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Offer him a 5 yr. 125 mil. deal. 2012-13, 20 mil per, 2014-16 @ 25 per yr. 2017, a club option of 23 mil or a 10 mil. buyout. Its the same deal Ryan Howard got, and if Prince doesnt like it, he can pound sand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With who? The point I am making is that you upgrade when you can. We need a great starter and a middle of the order bat. Fielder provides one, but we may not be able to address the other for another year. Does that mean you wait and try to get both in one offseason? What legit bat is there in 2013 or 2014?

How high do you think the payroll can/will/should go?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Offer him a 5 yr. 125 mil. deal. 2012-13, 20 mil per, 2014-16 @ 25 per yr. 2017, a club option of 23 mil or a 10 mil. buyout. Its the same deal Ryan Howard got, and if Prince doesnt like it, he can pound sand.

He will get more than what Howard got...as he should.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This Fielder discussion really highlights how much of a rudderless ship the Orioles really are right now.

You either try to win with the talent you have or you try to build something the right way. The O's are 100% stuck in between. They won't spend to win with the talent we have, they won't sell current assets for prospects and they won't scale back on spending and re-invest the money into the Rule IV draft and international talent.

What a hopeless fandom this has become.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless the Orioles somehow come up with a certified #1 starter, extend Hardy and Jones, and Robert's can prove he is healthy (and can still play at a high level), Prince Fielder won't even give the Orioles the time of day, let alone consider signing a contract. Also, I honestly don't think that money will be the main objective for Fielder because no matter who signs him, he will get more than he can possibly spend in a lifetime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This Fielder discussion really highlights how much of a rudderless ship the Orioles really are right now.

You either try to win with the talent you have or you try to build something the right way. The O's are 100% stuck in between. They won't spend to win with the talent we have, they won't sell current assets for prospects and they won't scale back on spending and re-invest the money into the Rule IV draft and international talent.

What a hopeless fandom this has become.

This is true...but it shouldn't be.

This team could deal a bunch of players and still be in as good or better shape entering 2012 as they would be if they kept all of those guys.

They just don't see it...Everything is short term thinking...There is very little vision or long term planning going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, we are one bat and guys like Wieters, Markakis, Jones, Reynolds and Hardy playing up to their abilities. Thinking that Fielder will not be really good from 28-32 and probably above average the two years after that is short-sighted IMO.
I think Weiters, Markakis, Jones, Reynolds, and Hardy, are currently playing up to their potential. How much good is it doing us? We need SP. I was all for going after Fielder if Matusz, Bergesen, and Tillman, had showed some progress. But they can't be counted on. We need to sign 2 FA SP, if we trade Guthrie, a 2B, and a LF, more than we need one Fielder.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I say there is zero chance that gets him.

You want Fielder? You want to be serious about getting him to Baltimore? If you are, then you have to go into the negotations willing to put SEVEN years on the table at least 22 million a year...If you aren't willing to at least commit to that contract, then don't bother negotiating.

If I can front load the contract at $25M per for the first two season then I go 7/$144M, but I want to mitigate the risk of that 7th year a little. The 7th year of Fielder at $16M sounds much better than $22M or higher depending how it would be worked. I think a guy like Fielder wants to feel wanted and he hasn't with the Brewers. I go full court on the guy and make it clear he is priority #1 and #2. If given a meeting my goal would be for him or Boras to not walk out until a contract was signed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I can front load the contract at $25M per for the first two season then I go 7/$144M, but I want to mitigate the risk of that 7th year a little. The 7th year of Fielder at $16M sounds much better than $22M or higher depending how it would be worked. I think a guy like Fielder wants to feel wanted and he hasn't with the Brewers. I go full court on the guy and make it clear he is priority #1 and #2. If given a meeting my goal would be for him or Boras to not walk out until a contract was signed.

Why would you want to frontload the contract? There is a reason that contracts are never frontloaded. Money paid tomorrow is always better then money paid today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I can front load the contract at $25M per for the first two season then I go 7/$144M, but I want to mitigate the risk of that 7th year a little. The 7th year of Fielder at $16M sounds much better than $22M or higher depending how it would be worked. I think a guy like Fielder wants to feel wanted and he hasn't with the Brewers. I go full court on the guy and make it clear he is priority #1 and #2. If given a meeting my goal would be for him or Boras to not walk out until a contract was signed.

All Fielder is going to ultimately care about is money.

It sounds to me that you want him bad but not bad enough to do what it takes to get him here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is true...but it shouldn't be.

This team could deal a bunch of players and still be in as good or better shape entering 2012 as they would be if they kept all of those guys.

They just don't see it...Everything is short term thinking...There is very little vision or long term planning going on.

peter-angelos.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
    • Interesting. I had forgotten that they signed him and then got him in the pitching lab in the offseason. Since September is prior to the end of the season, I would take "two year contract" to mean September '23 is Year 1, and then '24 is Year 2.  That is a cool article. Very encouraging how closely they are following the KBO. 
    • I think most teams would want to have an MVP candidate at quarterback.   Most of the time this will mean that he is better than the guy they currently have.  That's why. My quote was not taking salary into account.  If you take his current salary into account I think you are still talking about a majority of the NFL teams that would take him right now.  If the salary is an issue you find a way to make it work.  I'm starting to come around to the idea that the salary cap is kinda fake in a way after I keep seeing teams do stuff like adding void years other trickery to get the guys they want.
    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...