Jump to content

Is Yankee/Red Sox Hegemony coming to an end?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

As the money keeps flowing so will the wins. If not for a complete catastrophe of injuries and other off field issues Yanks would have been right there with Red Sox.

And it looks like the "money will keep flowing" for the NYY. There are multiple stories in the sports pages and web sites suggesting the NYY will be looking to spend $300 million during this off season and they have a pretty impressive shopping list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From 2012

Philadelphia: $169,728,180Boston: $168,614,614L.A. Angels: $160,146,581L.A. Dodgers: $129,080,186St. Louis: $115,449,953Chicago Cubs: $107,708,021N.Y. Mets: $103,710,802Chicago White Sox: $101,763,212Minnesota: $101,165,992Milwaukee: $99,931,760Atlanta: $97,254,832Toronto: $92,133,335Miami: $89,875,132
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm on the record as stating that this entire Red Sox season was one large middle-finger stuck up at the regression gods.

I expect them to finish 3rd in the division next year, at best.

#hopeful

They were the luckiest team of all time.

Edited by weams
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They were the luckiest team f all time.

I just look at their roster and yes, they have some talent, but guys like Nava, Carp, Steven Drew, Iglesias, Saltalamacjkaia, Napoli, Gomes, David Ross, Middlebrooks, whoever the hell also played 3rd for them when Middlebrooks wasn't playing well, etc etc. Felix Dubront, Koji retiring 395 straight batters etc etc

I mean, a lot of these guys are has-beens or never-weres (this guy's dead! Cross him off the list!) and they came together and just rolled.

Now they may lose Ellsbury and I really really think they're gonna get hit hard by the regression monster. Or maybe these guys are all awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just look at their roster and yes, they have some talent, but guys like Nava, Carp, Steven Drew, Iglesias, Saltalamacjkaia, Napoli, Gomes, David Ross, Middlebrooks, whoever the hell also played 3rd for them when Middlebrooks wasn't playing well, etc etc. Felix Dubront, Koji retiring 395 straight batters etc etc

I mean, a lot of these guys are has-beens or never-weres (this guy's dead! Cross him off the list!) and they came together and just rolled.

Now they may lose Ellsbury and I really really think they're gonna get hit hard by the regression monster. Or maybe these guys are all awesome.

Well, they cheat well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bet the Orioles could've won a World Series too with an extra 60 million or so to spend...

Lets see...maybe we'd have Darvish? or Cliff Lee? Instead of a potential Feldman signing this off season maybe we'd see Tanaka?

Not trying to say the Orioles would definitely be able to leap to the front of the standings with more money but it without a doubt wouldn't hurt!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.

Whatever your interpretation of "hegemony" is, I believe that this has all played out very interestingly.

OThe A.L. East was unquestionably marked by Yankee/Red Sox hegemony from 2003-2007 ........ then the Rays got up there from 2008-present, winning one pennant, making 3 postseason appearances, and are now well on their way to their 6th consecutive winning season. It was the Yankees and the Rays on top of the division in 2010-2011 (thanks in part to the Orioles taking 5 out of 7 games from the Red Sox in the final week and-a-half of the 2011 season.) Then the Yankees, the Orioles, and the Rays all won 90 or more games in 2012, with the Rays being the odd man out of the postseason at 90-72, while the Red Sox floundered all the way down to last place, at 69-93. Now, the Red Sox have regained their dominance atop the division this year. They (the Red Sox) really putting the hammer down in the last 3 weeks, going 15-4 in their last 19 games to go from being in a 1st place tie with the Rays to having a commanding 8 and-a-half game lead. The Bostonians are almost certainly assured of coasting to the (A.L. East) title ........ but the Yankees have slipped back, and are in danger of missing the postseason for only the 2nd time in the last 18 years.

Even with the Rays and the Orioles hammering their way into contention as of late, at least one of these teams (the Yankees or the Red Sox) have managed to stay at or very near top of the A.L. East., one way or the other. Fortunately for us, we are no longer the doormats of the division, and (along with the Rays) will be trying to knock both of these teams out of the postseason in the same year in 2014 and beyond. But as of now, they both just won't go away at the same time.

Maybe next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They were the luckiest team of all time.

I don't know about that, but I do think the Blue Jays this past year were one of the unluckiest teams of all time. At the present time, I don't think it would take that much for the most of the teams in the AL East to fall to the bottom of the division or rise to the top. Even though the Rays have so much consistency and depth because they are so well managed, they could fall to the bottom if they trade away Price or not re-sign someone like Loney and not find way to replace their production. The Red Sox could find themselves in a similar position since they seem to be shying away from big free agent contracts at the moment. On the opposite end of the spectrum the Yankees could wind up as the Blue Jays if even more high priced players get hurt or just tail off. In some way the O's are in the most precarious position because they don't have that much depth, their management has a mixed track record, and they obviously cannot spend with New York, Boston and Toronto. There is a great deal of parity in the AL East right now but the reasons why, team by team, is fascinating. It's hard to see any of these teams being dominant any time soon and predicting failure or disappointment for any of them seems pointless too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I have not seen any reports of a limit on the number of qualifying offers a team can make.   I disagree that Santander is unlikely to receive a QO, or that he will accept it if he gets one.  Of course, it depends how the rest of his season plays out.  But I’ve been on record that if Santander has a season as good as the last two (120/121 OPS+), he should get a QO and will turn it down.  Right now he’s at 131 OPS+, so we’ll see how it goes from here.  
    • I was curious how GRod would pitch given that huge crowd and electric atmosphere. I feel like he has a tendency to get too amped up and overthrow. Granted I didn’t start watching until inning 3, but he looked absolutely in control and executed his pitches.  Certainly a big step forward as far as I’m concerned.
    • Unless Santander goes on an absolute tear the rest of the season, I don't think he turns down a qualifying offer. And even then, it'd be real easy to look at FA deals for 30-ish year old outfielders who are good regulars but not stars and realize there's a good chance he won't beat a QO in guaranteed money, especially with a QO attached. As much as I'd like the pick, I don't want to gamble 20-30M and another year of stunted opportunity for our young outfielders on Santander turning down a QO.
    • Yeah, it's getting to the point where I'm not going to cry if McDermott finishes the year in AAA. I'm not against bringing him up necessarily, but he's clearly got more work to do on control/command if he wants to be a good major league starter long-term.
    • Are there any other qualifications other than signing a contract for 50+M?  A contract of that value spread over 3-4 years would give him a raise and make other teams give some consideration to sign him.  I think that's the only way a QO would work for him.  But I don't think they put him in jeopardy - altho the Orioles could match an offer, I suppose.  I think they value him pretty highly even if he won't command top money. 
    • I did say "unlikely" before "no matter what." Now that I re-read that though, it's kind of a bizarre sentence so I can see why you interpreted it that way. Of course there's a shot a player taken at 1-22 succeeds. Elias is certainly above average at drafting, possibly well above average, but the odds are still against him here, as they are for pretty much any individual pick he makes. I'm not trying to knock Elias here, just stating the fact that the vast majority of players selected in the back of the first round don't turn into solid regulars and so you shouldn't pass up someone you think is more likely to succeed here to draft "for need." I'm certain someone who will be available at this pick will have an incredible major league career. The odds are against it being whoever we draft though. That's just math.
    • I used to think we had a plethora of outfielders ready to replace the current guys, but not I'm not sure. Cowser is one. Does the FO trust Stowers? Heston is another as far as his bat goes, but how bad is the defense if you have Stowers, Cowser and Heston? How long before Bradfield is ready? Will Norby or Mayo move to the OF? Does that make it any better. If Santander has his typical year, I would give him the QO. So what if you have to pay him large for one year? It's not like our payroll is high right now.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...