Jump to content

J'Accuse


luismatos4prez

Recommended Posts

This is a fact.

So far this year the Jays are OPSing .803 at Home (5th in MLB) but only .660 on the road (24th in MLB).

Colorado's is pretty funny too though. Apparently Coors Field is even better than cheating?

.848 (2nd in MLB) while only .669 on the road (27th in MLB)

The difference, of course, is that ALL teams should have a higher OPS at Coors...not just the home team. The Jays are dirty rotten cheaters if this is true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 147
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I have never been more convinced in a conspiracy theory in my life than I am that the Blue Jays were stealing signals in this most recent series. There is just no way I buy that they were hitting home runs like that against our pitching staff unless they knew what was coming. Their huge uptick in power at home versus the visiting team's slipping up in their park is just ridiculous. It defies all logic. You can't say they hit better at home because it's a hitter's park, because for every other team that goes in there, it's absolutely not. Something dirty is going on in that stadium.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have never been more convinced in a conspiracy theory in my life than I am that the Blue Jays were stealing signals in this most recent series. There is just no way I buy that they were hitting home runs like that against our pitching staff unless they knew what was coming. Their huge uptick in power at home versus the visiting team's slipping up in their park is just ridiculous. It defies all logic. You can't say they hit better at home because it's a hitter's park, because for every other team that goes in there, it's absolutely not. Something dirty is going on in that stadium.

Investigate and force the Jays to forfeit all their home wins this season. That'll teach them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have never been more convinced in a conspiracy theory in my life than I am that the Blue Jays were stealing signals in this most recent series. There is just no way I buy that they were hitting home runs like that against our pitching staff unless they knew what was coming. Their huge uptick in power at home versus the visiting team's slipping up in their park is just ridiculous. It defies all logic. You can't say they hit better at home because it's a hitter's park, because for every other team that goes in there, it's absolutely not. Something dirty is going on in that stadium.

Tommy Hunter was throwing batting practice.

Jake Arrieta is struggling.

Not sure what happened last night, didn't watch the game but I listened to the first half of it.

Even if they are stealing signals, it's on you to change up the signals. If they were stealing signals all the way up to the middle of yesterday's game, shame on the O's for not changing the signals.

It's sore loser talk, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I was Dan Duquette, I'd have someone from the warehouse perform a detailed statistical study for the last 3 years. If something is obvious, forward it to mlb. We can conjecture all we want but if your pitchers think something is fishy, there probably is something fishy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I figured out a way to use ESPN to show me how other teams hit vs. the Blue Jays at Rogers Centre vs. everywhere else.

So at Rogers Centre the Jays are OPSing .803 while their opponents are OPSing .712.

Everywhere else the Jays are OPSing .660 while their opponents are OPSing .772.

So it LOOKS like the Jays trend of hitting better in Toronto is against the trend of how everyone else hits there. Jays opponents tend to hit Jays pitching harder away from Rogers Centre.

For kicks, here is the Colorado equivalent analysis:

At Coors, Colorado is OPSing .848 and their opponents are hitting .858.

Away from Coors, Colorado is OPSing .669 and their opponents are hitting .803.

So all teams seem to benefit from the "Coors Effect."

The Toronto data so far seems to indicate that only the Jays are benefiting from the "Rogers Effect."

Interesting eh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually it should be on MLB if the Jays are in fact cheating.

He could have been tipping his pitches... That's happened to pitchers before. Randy Johnson did it and the O's laced him pretty good in '97.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was discussed in the game thread yesterday. Someone stated that the Jays, as a team, had a home OPS more then a 100 points higher then on the road.

Yeah. .130+ going into last night, over .140 now.

I'm not much of a conspiracy guy, but it looked pretty clear to me that something was going on for three reasons: (i) as Hammel said, big cuts on breaking pitches; (ii) all four HRs were w/ no one on, on FBs down; and (iii) the fact that the Jays did very little runners on - all 9 hits were w/ the bases empty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, this is all interesting - but I think we should pump the brakes a bit. Without any further evidence, it comes across as whining and looking for excuses after getting our asses handed to us in Canada. We swept them there earlier in the season, so I'm not sure what's different now vs. then, other than we're not playing very good right now.

I have to say, the splits, and Hammels comments are intriguing, I'm not denying that, but I wouldn't go around assuming that this is definitely occurring. Personally, I'd have rather Hammel keep it to himself and go through the appropriate channels to lodge a complaint. It doesn't look good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if they are stealing signals, it's on you to change up the signals. If they were stealing signals all the way up to the middle of yesterday's game, shame on the O's for not changing the signals.

It's sore loser talk, IMO.

He could have been tipping his pitches... That's happened to pitchers before. Randy Johnson did it and the O's laced him pretty good in '97.

There is prior speculation concerning the Jays and stealing signs. Tipping pitches and stealing signs, legally, is part of the game.

Having an outside party steal signs is cheating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, this is all interesting - but I think we should pump the brakes a bit. Without any further evidence, it comes across as whining and looking for excuses after getting our asses handed to us in Canada. We swept them there earlier in the season, so I'm not sure what's different now vs. then, other than we're not playing very good right now.

I have to say, the splits, and Hammels comments are intriguing, I'm not denying that, but I wouldn't go around assuming that this is definitely occurring. Personally, I'd have rather Hammel keep it to himself and go through the appropriate channels to lodge a complaint. It doesn't look good.

I have no problem w/ him voicing his opinion. At all. The splits are, in fact, pretty remarkable. And what I saw last night was pretty remarkable, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I don't think we can have this discussion and stay within board rules. I also think we would all be speculating about things we probably shouldn't.
    • I think this sums it up extremely well. I don't have faith any more that any of these guys from the GM down are any better than anyone else. They just seem average and flawed to me, all the way down to the players (and in the case of our prospects, well below average and incredibly flawed). I'll hope for the best, but they did an excellent job killing any positive expectations I have for this group going forward.  And that is the hardest pill to swallow from last night and the last half season. At least the 1969 Os fans had 1970, and the 1979 Os fans had 1983.  Baseball blue balls is the perfect way to describe the last 40 years of fandom.
    • If Elias and company don't much this offseason, we will not finish .500 next year and a wasted year in 2025!!
    • I dont mean to use your post...but something uncharacteristically negative happened has me thinking about a question I want to ask but feel it will cause a political storm.  So I am not raising this question to start a debate on an issue, but I am genuinely curious. What happened to the Orioles sometime in June seemed to be that they no longer were a cohesive unit.  Yes there were injuries.  But injuries can also bring tight groups together.  This group that has seemed tight almost seemed to splinter.  Sure winning is fun and when it stops nothing is as fun.  But it seems like something could have happened that internally split this group apart.  Did it?  Whatever IT would be happened sometime in June before the All Star Break.  Until then things were rolling and Gunnar was raising the question of whether he was having the best season by a SS ever.   So what started the slide? Did it start after the Yankee Series in NY after a 17-5 win on June 20 with the Orioles leaving town after taking 2 of 3?  The Orioles went to Houston and lost three straight before returning to Baltimore and losing 2 straight to Cleveland before righting the ship and taking game three. Then Orioles played well at times after but never again played like a team in command.  So I went back and saw that the Texas series began on 6/27 with an 11-2 game started by Burnes (7 innings 88 Pitches) and included HRs by Mullins, Kjerstad, Rutschman and Cowser and in looking at all of that I saw something that I honestly had completely forgotten about. On June 27, the Orioles hosted the Rangers and began an MLB sponsored Pride Week.  Not really a bid deal, most all MLB teams and professional teams do.  Like it.  Hate it.  They all do it.  But I also saw the post that Austin Hays put out that same day on instagram.  He didn't say anything specific about the Pride events, he shared a religious point of view that spoke about evil.  The links were not direct, but obvious.   Cut to today.  The Orioles have never regained the superiority they held over everyone prior to June.  Hays...is gone.  I know he was an obvious trade candidate.  I thought the idea of trading him was fine.  But my question is did the events around Pride Night June 27 somehow cause a fracture in a clubhouse?   And please I am not saying it did.  I am simply a fan who is stuggling to see what broke.  I mean I see what broke.  But why?  The Red Sox collapse in 2011 had pizza and beer and locker room drama that came out after the fact to explain their epic collapse.  The didn't become excellent chokers magically on Sept 3 with a 9 game lead and then totally miss the playoffs when the Great Andino drove in the final nail. Something broke, it spread and it ate everything. I just think it is more likely something interpersonal happened in the clubhouse than the franchise approach that was working stopped.  Or that all of MLB found a way to turn Henderson from a player on a 12 WAR pace to one who struggled to field, throw, hit and run.   So my question to the GM and Manager would be.  Did something happen in mid June that affected the psyche of this team and was it related to the June 27 post by Austin Hays on the first night of Pride Week?  Thank you and I'll take your answer off line.
    • I don't really consider it choking when a team that has struggled for several months loses two games in a row.  The O's went 29-37 since July 7 (the date when they tied their best W/L margin for the season).  The offense had showed the ability to go utterly MIA some time after the All Star Break.  This was just more of that.
    • My take on the clutch thing is, clutchness/unclutchness can both be real things based on the human factors at hand, and it isn’t all just sequencing luck. But also 1) A guy’s clutchness can change from month to month and season to season just like a guy might have better or worse barrel rates at different times because of subtle changes in approach. 2) Observers are far too quick to say someone IS clutch/unclutch, definitively, instead of having had a clutch/unclutch performance in a certain window. 3) Other parts of baseball talent are way more predictable and steady than clutchness. So you don’t build your team by chasing what you perceive to be clutchness. 
    • This is the key issue.  Easier to hit when everyone is hitting, pitching is mediocre and there is less pressure.  What creates pressure?  Good pitching, slumps, injuries and trying to shoe horn in young, not ready players.  All of that amps up in the post season.   It is on coaches to manage player egos and mindset and GM to acquire players to fill needs.  Both Elias and Hyde squandered a big opportunity this year.   Teams don’t win 100 games or play at a 100 win pace by accident or fluke.  The 2nd half was more than enough of a sample size to judge the team’s readiness to take the next step.   Ironically they managed a pretty dreadful pitching situation fairly well - frontline starter injuries and BP /depth/implosion issues, even better when you consider the team was only average defensively.  The hitting/lineup was a disaster in judgment, coaching and performance. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...