Jump to content

Sun: Players want free agent help


FellsPointOsFan

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Can we not have a moratorium on steroid talk? Every time certain players are brought up as potential targets in what could become an interesting thread, someone jumps in with steroid allegations even though they've been discussed ad nauseum in other threads.

I'm getting sick of it.

There is a difference between players "accused" of steroids use and those who have admitted to using. The O's <i>must</i> avoid those in the latter category.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't forget Luis Gonzalez. I revised my 25-man prediction to include him as a possible acquisition for leftfield. Either him or Wilson.

If we get Luis Gonzalez...I might have to throw in the towel. I probably talking crazy right now, but damn...he's exactly what we DON'T need...older, stop gap, past his prime, great guy, clubbhouse leader..where have I heard this before...

Sigh....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the major problem is summed up here:

We made big mistakes in 2003-04 and 2004-05, and I just don't know that it's going to be possible to make up for those mistakes this winter.

I agree. We can go all out and get Soriano and he will address a big hole but he's not going to be enough to put us into contention unless the other players start playing to win and don't give up so easily like they seemed to do this year, AND we see some major progress from our young pitchers.

The O's painted themselves into a corner with all this losing. Now the players are fed up and they want some help, but the help really isn't there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's why this team needs to realize the urgency in signing quality players. Delgado could be our 1B right now. Vlad could arguably be our RF/DH right now if we really wanted him. Who knows who could be in our rotation if we were aggressive. And then there are countless other second-tier, high OBP players that we skipped over for whatever reason to sign 38-39-40 year old veterans.

It's a disease, this team has. It's not going to go away overnight, especially with Angelos still the owner, so don't get your hopes up this offseason. Very little, if anything, is going to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at the quotes in this article and look at the Angelos quotes in TonySoprano's tag. Why does anyone believe this year will be any different than last year and the year before that and the year before that and the year before that and the year before that and the year before that and the year before that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sounds to me like this team is on the verge of quitting before next season even starts, IF some big changes to improve the club aren't made.

Not good......

It's not going to happen. Most guys want their money and a ring. Even if this team signed all the top FA's available, it still wouldn't win a ring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While there have been several organizational meetings over the last month, Orioles owner Peter G. Angelos has not given his executives a budget to work under. Traditionally, he has not done so, preferring to deal with potential moves on a case-by-case basis. Angelos would not comment for this article.

Does he run his law firm this way? If so, how does he compete with the bazillion other ambulance chasers out there?

"Mr. Angelos, the secretarial pool downstairs needs to order office supplies".

"Send me the quote for the paperclips, then we'll move onto the copier paper".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think BRob and company are going to be really disappointed next February. Angelos will slowly authorize a few contract offers that won't be accepted, and we'll wind up with scraps, not wanting to buy into the "lunacy" of some of the free agent deals.

Then we'll finish fourth next year while Angelos promises to do everything he can to compete in 2008. Don't 'cha love him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at the quotes in this article and look at the Angelos quotes in TonySoprano's tag. Why does anyone believe this year will be any different than last year and the year before that and the year before that and the year before that and the year before that and the year before that and the year before that?
I don't get my hopes up and it saves me on the disappointment. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice shame on me, fool me more than that, I don't think sooo. Maese has already started drafting the obituary.

The article causes me no choice.

That's right, I triple-dog-dare the front office to do something really big this offseason. ;)

C'mon, Mr. Flanagan, my ego can gladly take being wrong on this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a couple questions about this. #1 -- is this major league payroll only? #2 -- does this include Ponson (whose arbitration case still has not been settled yet)? #3 -- does this include any deferred monies for players who are no longer on the team?

This Ponson thing really bothers me. It seems the FO/Angelos is including his salary in the 2006 payroll numbers, when in fact, it has not been determined if we will actually have to pay him. Including El Sid's $10 million seems extremely misleading to me -- it elevates payroll and makes it seem like we've shelled out more than we actually have.

I'd like to see one of our local journalists pose this question/angle to the FO. Or, at least, investigate when/if the Ponson arbitration hearing will ever take place.

Witchy

According to USA Today, our salary is 72 million: http://asp.usatoday.com/sports/baseball/salaries/teamresults.aspx?team=2

And we traded Javy and Conine midseason and didn't add anyone but Russ Ortiz (who we didn't have to pay), so I think that the 80 million is high and incorrect. My guess is that we really only had to pay about 70 million. But, then if you are counting Sir Sidney, then you have 80. But, counting him would be stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I just don't trust that Luzardo is healthy even if he's controllable for a couple more years.
    • That’s interesting.      Kjerstad and Povich for Crochet?  
    • Well, yes and no.  It still remains to be seen how high attendance can go.   Let’s say that attendance this year falls 150,000 short of 2014.   (I’m not saying it will, but that’s not implausible at present.)   At that point, I think you have to ask why.  That 2014 team was in its third straight winning season and was the best team we’d had in a long time.  This 2024 team is in its third straight winning season and is probably the best team we’ve had in several decades.   So how did we lose 150,000 fans (if that turns out to be the situation)?   The O’s were 14th in MLB in attendance in 2014, they’re 18th now despite the great team they have.  
    • Eno Sarris of The Athletic Two who might just make it Cade Povich, Orioles The four-seam fastball almost landed Povich on the worrisome warts list because it’s not good. It has less ride than most four-seamers and sits 92 mph, a full two ticks below league average. Stuff+ hates the pitch (73) and that lines up with the FanGraphs scouting grades (45 present value), but he’s managed to locate it almost exclusively at the top of the zone and (so far) out of the happy zones (.190 slugging against). If you’ve read this far, the caveat for Povich will be of no surprise: His cutter looks decent, and he featured it more heavily in his second start. That pitch has more vertical and horizontal break than the average cutter, hums along at a decent 88 mph, and though it’s been hit hard so far, has better underpinnings for future success. The best news for Povich is a decent mix of three secondary pitches: an above-average sweeper, a big slow curveball, and a changeup that doesn’t have much to speak for it movement or velocity-wise but hasn’t allowed great contact so far (.200 slugging). Povich got a 45 current command grade and a 60 future from FanGraphs, and there’s a gulf between those numbers. If he succeeds, it’s as a command-and-mix guy who throws just enough four-seamers and cutters to keep the batter guessing. This is not the profile of a pitcher who will overpower hitters with any of his pitches. It’s also worth pointing out that the league is getting better and better at hitting sweepers, which might not be a great thing for this starter, as that pitch grades out the best of all of his offerings.
    • Going up against a LHP, so you know we're going to see McCann. There will be lots of complaining.
    • Our whole outfield situation is very unsettled.  It would be hard to guess today who will be starting playoff games in the OF, other than Santander.   I’m hoping Cowser eventually takes off again, but he’s been pretty tough to watch at times over the last 6 weeks. Stowers could grab a spot.  Hays has been hot of late and we’ll see if that continues.   Mullins has sucked for 6-7 weeks but I haven’t given up on the guy.   Kjerstad continues to rake in the minors and you have to think he’ll get another opportunity at some point.  It’s just really hard to know how the rest of this season will go for our outfielders and who will be hot when playoff time comes. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...