Jump to content

Mark Reynolds Value Hard to Measure


brianod

Recommended Posts

How about now?

Reynolds obviously is a polarizing figure. After half the season I wanted him benched. After tonight, guys probably want to throw money at him. Let's let this play out, take a breath and make the judgement after the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Reynolds obviously is a polarizing figure. After half the season I wanted him benched. After tonight, guys probably want to throw money at him. Let's let this play out, take a breath and make the judgement after the season.

I'm just saying, he is not getting non-tendered..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No judgement need to be made after the season. I told you guys from the jump to believe in Mark Reynolds. Was he frauding in the beginning of the year? Yes sir! No doubt about it, but as I said then and now... he is a beast. He wants to win! He has bought into this team! He is a legit HR threat and like I told Mr. Firestone, you cannot just toss that away.

All hail The MF'n Sheriff!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No judgement need to be made after the season. I told you guys from the jump to believe in Mark Reynolds. Was he frauding in the beginning of the year? Yes sir! No doubt about it, but as I said then and now... he is a beast. He wants to win! He has bought into this team! He is a legit HR threat and like I told Mr. Firestone, you cannot just toss that away.

All hail The MF'n Sheriff!

When he's good, he's awesome. I'm just going to leave it there for now. I'm in celebration mode and don't want to argue with anyone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Angelos did fight the relocation.  He voted against, lobbied against it, withheld permission to adjust TV territories, and threatened to sue if not fairly compensated.  As long as the team was compensated for the loss of broadcast exclusivity, I don’t think he had any other case. From all reports, he drove a hard bargain and it took like 9 months to negotiate a compensation and settlement agreement. There was a wide discrepancy among various parties about what constituted just compensation with Angelos taking more pessimistic views of the impact of the Nats franchise and less optimistic view on MASN. Also, MASN was in perpetuity not temporary.  In hindsight, MASN probably didn’t provide the revenue protection intended because of how the dispute played out and how the RSN market collapsed, but that’s in hindsight. Overall, Angelos “won” the MASN dispute (at least the RSDC process) more than he lost it - the Nationals advocated for rights fees intentionally designed to bankrupt MASN but the RSDC didn’t use their comps. Overall, I think it’s fair to say that relocating a team to DC has hurt the Baltimore club’s market size and ability to fund a top-10 payroll.   HOWEVER, had the Nats not come to DC, the specter of an Orioles relocation to DC would have been hanging over our heads especially as Peter’s health declined, the stadium aged, and the lease approached. Peter would never have moved, but are we sure JA would turn down a higher offer of say $2.3BN offer from Ted Leonsis or someone with the intent to move the club to DC? I think as an Orioles fan it’s probably best to have another team in DC than have to worry about the Orioles ever relocating there.
    • Everything revolves around the health of the player. I think Gunnar has more. I think the collision with Mateo set Gunnar back and affected him in ways we will never know. I'm no mind specialist but Gunnar is young plays all out, and that had to bother him. I've watched that collision a number of times. No fault - just two players going all out and one is finished for the year. It just so happened that Gunnar got the yips and his batting went south soon thereafter. Maybe a coincidence but I think we will see a rejuvenated Gunnar next year and all stops are off. 
    • I’m not so sure the bolded part is true. I think a lot of that last bit can have to do with small skills: situational hitting/running, above average play in close games, generally things that can be boiled down to “luck.” I didn’t see this years team as having a major talent discrepancy from the 2023 version.
    • As great as Gunnar is can’t assume he matches last year. That said I like the odds of the team as a whole matching what we did. 
    • The real improvement of this team will come from within.    The 3-5 players they bring in from outside the org will supplement the roster…maybe put it over the top but the real improvement will come from those already in the org.
    • Yeah. -Would love to keep Burnes but I seriously doubt it. -I have a lot of faith in Adley.  - Holliday has huge ceiling even if he isn’t ready to be elite.  - doesn’t always work this way but the better your closer is tends to help rest of pen 
    • Nice OP. Thanks for the effort. Like the chart. Surprised it hasn't received much response. You sum up a lot of what I hope for as well. I'd add: I think a full - healty year of Westy will be even more valuable. I think Gunnar has even more in the tank. I want - hope that Holliday can develop into the lead off hitter and OBP table setter we need. And, I so want Cowser to cut down on strike outs and continue to develop as a professional hitter. I think he has the potential to cover for the loss of Santander while Big K develops on the right side. A lot to hope for but I believe these youngsters have a lot of potential yet to tap. And oh yes - I want Mayo to make Roy and all of us proud! Thanks again for the effort! I look at pitching as if we have a base. I agree with your points 1 and 2.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...