Jump to content

Antonen: O's have the brightest future in the AL East


Frobby

Recommended Posts

He voted for Melvin over Showalter, but Antonen's still serving up some home cooking:

At this point, the Orioles, Rays and Blue Jays are the three best in the division. The Yankees are aging and the Red Sox are caught in the middle of rebuilding and reloading.

And who in the AL East has the best future? At this point, it is the Orioles and their young pitching.

The Red Sox have in the outfield, at shortstop and in the bullpen. The Yankees have to deal with a thin rotation and ownership that wants to cut payroll.

The Rays have tons of pitching, but with a limited budget, will they ever have the run production to support the arms?

The Orioles' nucleus of Matt Wieters, Adam Jones, J.J. Hardy, Chris Davis, Nick Markakis and Manny Machado is going to be productive for a long time.

The rotation is loaded with pitchers that could each be better next season. The Orioles don't need to spend money this winter to compete with the Blue Jays.

They need to stay the course, find a left fielder, add a pitcher and keep the defense strong. They could be the pick to win the AL East next season.

But the Blue Jays will be a factor. The new players might work perfectly. If not, the Blue Jays will be dealing with payroll inflexibility for years, making it even better for the Orioles.

http://www.masnsports.com/mel_antonen/2012/11/even-after-potential-blue-jays-blockbuster-os-might-still-have-brightest-future-in-al-east.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I'm not sure he understands just how deep and talented the Blue Jays' system is.

I'm certainly still optimistic about our future, but the Jays should be very good for years to come.

Maybe, I think that Marlins deal could easily blow up their faces. I kinda hope Selig doesn't negate it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure he understands just how deep and talented the Blue Jays' system is.

I'm certainly still optimistic about our future, but the Jays should be very good for years to come.

It is deep enough that they didn't give up the best guys in the Marlins deal.

Of course prospects fail all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is deep enough that they didn't give up the best guys in the Marlins deal.

Of course prospects fail all the time.

True. I was relieved to see Brett Lawrie take a step back last year. He looked scary good for six weeks in 2011 but was pretty pedestrian in 2012. I still think he'll be an above average player, but hopefully not a superstud as he looked like he might be a year ago. Drabek is another guy who really hasn't panned out for them so far. They do have a pretty deep system and it seems likely that at least some of their top prospects will pan out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, that's pleasant to read but also insane. :D

Maybe not insane, but very optimistic. We do have a relatively young core, still with much uncertainty, especially in the starting rotation. At the end of the day, the pitching will determine whether we flourish or flounder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this was his "mea culpa" article after dissing Showalter in the MOY vote. Honestly, I won't read him after embarrassing Showalter by not voting for him even though he was one of Baltimore's votes. If I were Buck, I wouldn't give the guy the time of day again. No one in the local media wanted to call him out because he's one of them, but I'm not and I don't care. His vote was an embarrassment. Knowing that his vote would be published and still voting against Buck was a slap in the face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You really think writers should vote for their local guy instead of who they truly believe deserves the award?

Following this line of thought a little bit, isn't there a great deal of rage on this board reserved for the "company men" who support the O's no matter what the facts show? I know I've heard people in this thread use that phrase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You really think writers should vote for their local guy instead of who they truly believe deserves the award?
Took the words right out of my mouth...

Yes. It is the way is is supposed to be done. Especially when you work for the team. Well 78% of the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who says that's the way it's supposed to be done? And to what degree?

You okay with the NY writers voting for Girardi even if they felt he was third, at best?

I say it is the way it has always been done.

To all degrees when there is any question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • This posts wreaks of someone who has no idea what the cost of relievers are nowadays. Which is, of course, no surprise that you aren’t informed. Now that said, I don’t have an issue if you take someone out..I asked that very question. Who do you take out or what do you not acquire in favor of keeping Suarez?
    • You always have room for another high leverage guy.  And Akin has an option left according to FG.
    • Yea.  I feel the same way.  I really do not care strongly one way or another.  Sure, I think it's kind of ugly.  I also think HR's came pretty cheap before.  I like the exciting defensive plays it fosters and of course the random triple & odd carom make for some fun and unique moments.  But I don't think it helps or hurts the team in any substantial way short of helping out the pitching a little.   I sure don't think the players are changing their approaches.  If they keep it as is, that's fine with me.  If they modify it some way, that's fine with me as well.  It does seem like there is some opportunity for some unique seats down there by modifying it slightly.  When I first saw it, it almost appeared like a construction Phase 1.  That might be reasoning for pushing it back so far, allows them some flexibility in the future.   I also don't buy that a Free Agent RH hitter is going to care at all about the wall.   They are getting paid regardless.  I'd think that 1-maximizing payday 2-playing for a winner 3-finding a location that suits your family would be your priorities and your long-term stat line would be very close to the bottom of your list of concerns.  
    • His "ability to play RF" carries about $0 value
    • Yeah but if you think most of this money is going to upgrade things that are wrong or need improving, such as the ones @accinfo lists, I think you'll be disappointed.   They will be for new features, each one designed to create revenue via premium seating or premium "experience" areas or attractions that bring non baseball fans to the park to spend or sports betting related things. I'm not saying they won't fix some basic things that need it like upgrading the sound system or improving the point of sale technology.   I'm sure they will.   But the focus is going to be on the new attractions which are all designed with revenue enhancement in mind.
    • I’m not a lawyer … perhaps @Frobbymight know. Loss of income, future revenues? Damage to their franchise….Even with MASN the Orioles lost a ton on annual tv revenues
    • Congrats to the offense on playing a heck of a game. Lamar was incredible to watch, especially the play when the snap ended up on the ground and he had to run away towards the sideline and still found Likely for the score. It's very frustrating to me that the offense HAD to play so well because of the poor coaching and abysmal defensive play.  It's odd to me that Harbaugh still messes up timeout usage after being a coach in the league for over 15 years.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...