Jump to content

Orioles are one of the teams that the Twins have contacted in regards to Justin Morneau


FlipCup

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 272
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I hinted to this in another thread about Morneau. I think Butler is Plan A, Plan B is Morneau. At the end of the day I think it's going to be someone that we aren't talking alot about. Getting rid of Butler from KC's perspective doesn't make sense now that they're adding Free Agents. They look like they're trying to position themselves to contend as opposed to rebuilding like they always seem to be doing.

Morneau sounds like the piece IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hinted to this in another thread about Morneau. I think Butler is Plan A, Plan B is Morneau. At the end of the day I think it's going to be someone that we aren't talking alot about. Getting rid of Butler from KC's perspective doesn't make sense now that they're adding Free Agents. They look like they're trying to position themselves to contend as opposed to rebuilding like they always seem to be doing.

Morneau sounds like the piece IMO.

must have missed it but who has KC signed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Morneau earns $14 mm next year and will be a free agent. I doubt the Orioles would take him at that salary if Minnesota was giving him away for free. Now if they want to eat half his salary, we can throw them a C prospect.

Agreed, but this is what I figured was meant by this...maybe a B prospect if the salary is picked up, but if not C and $14m for just one season? I could handle that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more I hear about who we're possibly involved with at first base, the more I think we just need to bite the bullet and re-sign Reynolds. Have him work with an experienced infield coach in the spring and get him more acclimated to the footwork needed to make him a better fielder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Morneau earns $14 mm next year and will be a free agent. I doubt the Orioles would take him at that salary if Minnesota was giving him away for free. Now if they want to eat half his salary, we can throw them a C prospect.

The O's will take on money if it makes sense. They aren't going to go out and give Victorino $39M to put on a uniform and be a shell of his former self. I know $14M is a big number, but it's not tied up to years. It's one year. See if he can get that stroke back that made him one of the best hitters in the AL. I think an Oliver Drake type of prospect(s) will get this done. With his recent production, $$ and health issues the Twins aren't going to ask for the moon on this one.

I think going into the meetings Butler was Plan A, Morneau is Plan B. Morse is Plan C.

I can easily see Plan B and C coming to fruition... Would everyone be happy with that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • This posts wreaks of someone who has no idea what the cost of relievers are nowadays. Which is, of course, no surprise that you aren’t informed. Now that said, I don’t have an issue if you take someone out..I asked that very question. Who do you take out or what do you not acquire in favor of keeping Suarez?
    • You always have room for another high leverage guy.  And Akin has an option left according to FG.
    • Yea.  I feel the same way.  I really do not care strongly one way or another.  Sure, I think it's kind of ugly.  I also think HR's came pretty cheap before.  I like the exciting defensive plays it fosters and of course the random triple & odd carom make for some fun and unique moments.  But I don't think it helps or hurts the team in any substantial way short of helping out the pitching a little.   I sure don't think the players are changing their approaches.  If they keep it as is, that's fine with me.  If they modify it some way, that's fine with me as well.  It does seem like there is some opportunity for some unique seats down there by modifying it slightly.  When I first saw it, it almost appeared like a construction Phase 1.  That might be reasoning for pushing it back so far, allows them some flexibility in the future.   I also don't buy that a Free Agent RH hitter is going to care at all about the wall.   They are getting paid regardless.  I'd think that 1-maximizing payday 2-playing for a winner 3-finding a location that suits your family would be your priorities and your long-term stat line would be very close to the bottom of your list of concerns.  
    • His "ability to play RF" carries about $0 value
    • Yeah but if you think most of this money is going to upgrade things that are wrong or need improving, such as the ones @accinfo lists, I think you'll be disappointed.   They will be for new features, each one designed to create revenue via premium seating or premium "experience" areas or attractions that bring non baseball fans to the park to spend or sports betting related things. I'm not saying they won't fix some basic things that need it like upgrading the sound system or improving the point of sale technology.   I'm sure they will.   But the focus is going to be on the new attractions which are all designed with revenue enhancement in mind.
    • I’m not a lawyer … perhaps @Frobbymight know. Loss of income, future revenues? Damage to their franchise….Even with MASN the Orioles lost a ton on annual tv revenues
    • Congrats to the offense on playing a heck of a game. Lamar was incredible to watch, especially the play when the snap ended up on the ground and he had to run away towards the sideline and still found Likely for the score. It's very frustrating to me that the offense HAD to play so well because of the poor coaching and abysmal defensive play.  It's odd to me that Harbaugh still messes up timeout usage after being a coach in the league for over 15 years.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...