Jump to content

2013 HOF Ballot: Who Gets Your Vote?


Rene88

Recommended Posts

http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/baseballinsider/my_hall_of_fame_ballot_rC1PsqLR9XhGn3vaUJMYNL#axzz2FezGkbHq

Mine would be:

Bonds (jerk, but would be a HOF regardless)

Clemens (see above)

Biggio (slam dunk)

Palmeiro (one of the best swings I have ever seen, some HR's might have been double's but would have gotten 3K hits regardless IMO)

Piazza

Lee Smith (Bruce Sutter is in the HOF, really?)

I know everyone loves Lofton, Raines, Trammel & Murphy but none of those guys are a slam dunk for me. If I had to pick one-it would be Raines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Bonds and Clemens have to go in. Two of the greatest to wear cleats. Palmeiro deserves it for me, for longevity over his career, he was such a good hitter for so long. However I could see why many would be on the fence with him, even with steroids left out of the discussion. Palmeiro should absolutely be in the Orioles HOF....

Piazza was a great offensive catcher but he could get left out when there are so many greats coming on the ballot.

I will be extremely disappointed if people are left out of the HOF for some HGH malarkey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bonds and Clemens choose to cheat to extend their careers and who knows how long they were using before then? Same with Palmerio.

As for Schilling,the HOF voters are told not to look at the postseason and based on that,his numbers don't justify him getting in.

Biggio and Piazza are no brainers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have six easy votes:

Curt Schilling (very similar to Mussina, and for me both of them deserve it)

Mike Piazza (easy top-10 all time catcher, maybe top-5)

Jeff Bagwell (otherworldly 8-year peak, career .948 OPS, no steroid evidence)

Alan Trammell (still deserves it; I have him ranked around #8-12 all-time SS)

Tim Raines (2nd greatest leadoff man ever is still pretty good; 85% career SB%)

Kenny Lofton (Similar to Trammell: he's around the #8-12 all-time CF. A better choice than Andre Dawson, for instance)

Then there's the four steroid guys. I'm still on the fence about it, but I'd lean toward yes. That would fill out my 10-man ballot with

Barry Bonds

Roger Clemens

Rafael Palmeiro

Mark McGwire

Sosa doesn't quite do it for me.

I'd vote for Craig Biggio, definitely, if there were more than 10 votes (or if the steroid four get left off), and Larry Walker would also make it. Edgar Martinez would be really close, but I think I'd leave him off. He's a very similar hitter to both Bagwell and Walker in length, peak, and total, one you account for Walker being in Colorado, but both Walker and Bagwell provided some speed and defense as well, and both are solid HOFers, not top-of-the-class, best-ever types.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bagwell never linked to steroids??? Say what??????

Edgar Martinez is a one dimensional player to me, not even close in my eyes.

Allow me to present the evidence that suggested Bagwell used steroids:

Well...gee...he looks pretty muscular.

Yeah...that's about it.

As for Martinez being one-dimensional, you could say the same thing about Harmon Killebrew, Willie McCovey, and Willie Stargell.

Only playing one side of the game exceptionally >>>>>>> Playing one side well and another terribly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bagwell was on the Mitchell list:

http://forums.jetnation.com/topic/47380-unofficial-mitchell-list-i-receieved/

I don't count that as hearsay, sorry.

Your link is titled "Unofficial Mitchell List"

Here's the names listed: Bagwell is not amongst them: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Major_League_Baseball_players_named_in_the_Mitchell_Report

I used to care a lot about the PED guys, now I really don't. Clemens and Bonds were HoF guys before they juiced...I won't get hugely upset if they don't get elected..at the same time, I won't be overjoyed if they do. I'm mainly interested in the spectacle that follows whatever decision is made, the arguments by the voters for and against and whatever other fallout there is.

My list looks like, in no specific order

Biggio

Bagwell

Piazza

I will flip **** if Morris somehow gets in. Unacceptable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moose and playbaltimorecom: both of you have Craig Biggio but not Tim Raines. Why is that? I can see an argument to have them both in or both out, but not one or the other (I left off Biggio due to ballot space only). Consider:

Career fWAR: Biggio 70.5, Raines 70.6

Career rWAR: Biggio 62.1, Raines 66.2

Career slash line: Biggio .281/.363/.433, Raines .294/.385/.425

5 year continuous peak rWAR: Biggio 32.0, Raines 31.4

7 year noncontinuous peak rWAR: Biggio 40.6, Raines 41.1

In JAWS (described here), Biggio is the #13 ranked 2B, just a bit behind the average HOF 2B (51.3 vs 54.4). Raines is the #8 ranked LF, a bit ahead of the average HOF LF (53.7 vs 50.7).

Biggio has the magic 3060 hits number and a very high rank in the all-time times on base list (H+BB+HBP); he's #17 with 4505, just behind Frank Robinson and Derek Jeter and just ahead of Honus Wagner and Paul Molitor. Raines is no slouch, though; he's #45 on the list with 3977, just behind Rogers Hornsby, Manny Ramirez, and Cap Anson and just ahead of Tony Gwynn. Plus, Raines has the stolen base argument: he's the 5th all time basestealer with 808, behind only Henderson, Lou Brock, Billy Hamilton, and Ty Cobb, AND Raines has the highest SB% of anyone with a large number of them.

To support Biggio but not Raines, you have to argue either (1) that the WAR positional adjustment isn't enough and Biggio's 2B performance was more valuable than Raines' (better) LF performance or (2) that Biggio's hit or TOB totals are important but Raines' SB totals are not. Also, you have to ignore the fact that owner collusion cost Raines games and playing time, helping keep some of his counting stats down.

In WAR terms, they're similar players. Why one and not the other?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

✓Bagwell

✓Biggio

✓Bonds

✓Raines

✓Clemens

✓Martinez

✓McGwire

✓Palmeiro

✓Piazza

✓Schilling

Walker, Sosa, Lofton, and Trammel are ones that I would consider putting in, but if I'm really pretending to be a writer, you can only vote for 10.

I believe steroid-era players should be inducted to the HOF but I support having an asterisk and explanation of asterisk for any players that are proven PED users.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moose and playbaltimorecom: both of you have Craig Biggio but not Tim Raines. Why is that? I can see an argument to have them both in or both out, but not one or the other (I left off Biggio due to ballot space only). Consider:

Career fWAR: Biggio 70.5, Raines 70.6

Career rWAR: Biggio 62.1, Raines 66.2

Career slash line: Biggio .281/.363/.433, Raines .294/.385/.425

5 year continuous peak rWAR: Biggio 32.0, Raines 31.4

7 year noncontinuous peak rWAR: Biggio 40.6, Raines 41.1

In JAWS (described here), Biggio is the #13 ranked 2B, just a bit behind the average HOF 2B (51.3 vs 54.4). Raines is the #8 ranked LF, a bit ahead of the average HOF LF (53.7 vs 50.7).

Biggio has the magic 3060 hits number and a very high rank in the all-time times on base list (H+BB+HBP); he's #17 with 4505, just behind Frank Robinson and Derek Jeter and just ahead of Honus Wagner and Paul Molitor. Raines is no slouch, though; he's #45 on the list with 3977, just behind Rogers Hornsby, Manny Ramirez, and Cap Anson and just ahead of Tony Gwynn. Plus, Raines has the stolen base argument: he's the 5th all time basestealer with 808, behind only Henderson, Lou Brock, Billy Hamilton, and Ty Cobb, AND Raines has the highest SB% of anyone with a large number of them.

To support Biggio but not Raines, you have to argue either (1) that the WAR positional adjustment isn't enough and Biggio's 2B performance was more valuable than Raines' (better) LF performance or (2) that Biggio's hit or TOB totals are important but Raines' SB totals are not. Also, you have to ignore the fact that owner collusion cost Raines games and playing time, helping keep some of his counting stats down.

In WAR terms, they're similar players. Why one and not the other?

Yeahhhh, you take this way more seriously than I do. I wouldn't be upset if Raines got in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Thank goodness a minor league system is not judged on wins and losses, because they are putting many Ws up of late. Delmarva is pretty much an embarrassment right now from the hitting side. The first real wave of international position prospects have been left wanting after the first month or so of the season. The Shorebirds are scoring a league low 2.29 runs per game and slashing a league worse .182/.259/.263/.523. The Tides pitching outside of Povich and McDermott to a lesser extent has been pretty bad minus a few decent relieves in Vespi, Krook and Charles.  Elias/Sig's thought on being able to identify pitching talent through pitch shapes and spin rates through the draft after the 10th round has been a pretty big failure. Armbruster was the flag ship pitcher and he's been a flop this year so far, though I had already seen major red flags from him last year. Not surprisingly these guys struggle at the high levels and why they were available that late. Glad to see Elias made a change in his draft philosophy last year and went after some younger, higher ceiling guys like Forret vs 21-year old juniors in those later rounds.   
    • Akin currently has a FIP of 1.11. He’s struck out 15 and walked 3 in 10 innings without yielding a homer.  I consider that well.
    • There are several advantages to a head first slide.    With a head first slide, the mass of your body (torso) is lunging forward, not pulling backward - you get to the bag quicker. When you tuck a leg to slide, your foot tends to raise up and not hit the front of the bag, whereas, with your hand you can hit the front of the bag and maintain contact with it. You can adjust the direction of your slide going head first and even switch which arm you extend to touch the bag (swim move) to avoid a tag.  Both can have their place.  I was taught to slide with the right leg tucked going into second base.  That way, your face/chest/crotch are not exposed to the throw from the catcher if the fielder misses the throw, and you're facing the outfield and can find the ball easier if there is an errant throw so you can decide quicker if you can take another base. 
    • Briefly, here is the method I use with a DirecTV DVR for all sorts of timing in football analysis: 1. From a recording on your DVR, hit pause at some point shortly before the ball is released by the pitcher 2. While still on pause, use the FF button to advance the video 1 "frame" at a time.  On 1080i, the screen is redrawn 30 times per second, so each click is 1/30th of a second.  On 720p or 1080p, it's 60 frames per second.  So timing should be accurate to either 1/30th (0.033) or 1/60th (0.017) of a second 3. Advance the video to the point of contact--It is easy to go forward, but difficult to go backward, so you need to advance slowly to fin the closest point 4. From that point, count the number of FF clicks until Gunnar hits 3rd base, you should actually be able to see the image move with each click, so it's easier to count these than you might think 5. Divide clicks counted by 30 to get seconds for the event.  For example, if you get 322 clicks, it's 10 and 22/30 seconds (10.73 sec).  This assumes the MASN broadcast is in 1080i. I've been using this method for more than 15 years and you can confirm calibration with an NFL game where the clock is on the screen.  Since you don't have that in baseball, you just have to know whether it's 30 or 60 clicks per second and you'll know that by whether it's an 11 or 22-second triple.
    • Wait, Drungo isn't allowed to make jokes? I thought that post was hilarious given the context. I think better of him for it, though I've always thought highly of him.
    • By the way, something they absolutely need to legislate is the size of the oven mitt. I forget who it was, one of these guys had one that was basically giving him 18 inch fingers.
    • You can also slide to the side of the bag and reach back... I'd like to see data both on safety and success rates for each one before making a call.  Either way, I agree, a team probably shouldn't on their own put themselves at a competitive disadvantage by voluntarily imposing rules on itself. So if this is a problem, then the proper way to deal with it would be to change the rules like they have with catcher's interference (which I support). 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...