Jump to content

Why can't the Orioles draft and develop pitchers like Gausman and Britton?(Not a new thread. Bumped)


mdbdotcom

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Britton was drafted to be a starter so him as a closer is somewhat of a fail. Gausman has talent unlike the others we have tried.

Yup, can you imagine how disappointed Steinbrenner must have been when Rivera didn't pan out as a starter?

As for Wells, Watson acknowledged that he and Gene Michael, his predecessor, who remains active in personnel matters, had spoken with the Reds, most recently the middle of last week.

"The asking price was too high," he said. "They wanted two of our top minor leaguers. That's why we backed off. We couldn't do that."

Jim Bowden, the Reds' general manager, declined to discuss the Yankees' involvement, but an official familiar with the Wells talks said Steinbrenner called Bowden Saturday night and offered pitcher Mariano Rivera and catcher Jorge Posada.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

I think if you look around the league and into their minor leagues, you will find plenty of pitchers that never developed into what the scouts had thought their future promotional could be.

We intimately know the Oriole failures and can rattle them off, and I and sure, this team is not alone.

Syd Thrift was a clown at the end, for sure, but early on, he said, 2 out of 3 pitchers drafted never make to the bigs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Early matusz, as in 2010 matusz, was quite good.

Didn't realize this was a thread from 2014, by the way. Why was it bumped?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I marked it in the title before bumping. I came across the piece on the Twins having the same issue.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So far he's about on par with an early Matusz
Scary comp, but true, at least, IMO

How on earth are we comparing these two? Their careers look nothing alike, nor do their underlying numbers or pitching styles.

Matusz 25 YO season lead to a 4.69 FiP over 100 innings split between starting and the pen. Gausman already has passed Brian's WAR for that year and still has the second half of the season to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How on earth are we comparing these two? Their careers look nothing alike, nor do their underlying numbers or pitching styles.

Matusz 25 YO season lead to a 4.69 FiP over 100 innings split between starting and the pen. Gausman already has passed Brian's WAR for that year and still has the second half of the season to go.

Wrong answer.

Matusz 2010 year was decent and had a 3.0 WAR in 32 starts and 175 innings and 4.30 ERA.

Their style might not be similar.

I talking about high draft pick, expected to be a TOR SP, and didn't pan out.

I am far from ready to pull the plug on Gausman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wrong answer.

Matusz 2010 year was decent and had a 3.0 WAR in 32 starts and 175 innings and 4.30 ERA.

Exactly my point! Matusz had one good year at age 23 and immediately fell apart. Why would we compare him to someone that is currently in his 4th straight year of solid MLB performance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • JD Martinez would be a more of the same kind of acquisition. He is not an impact bat and he is a periphery (around the margins) piece at this point. Why not set the bar higher and sign Alonso? Acquiring Pete Alonso allows you to move on from Mountcastle and put Mayo (where he belongs right now) DH. It also allows you to move on from O'Hearn.  Alonso gets everyday ABs and Mayo does. Those two things to a large degree help solve the lineup imbalance against LHP. I know Alonso will cost real money. But again who are we paying? The money is there. It's time to start using it (if we want to win in October).
    • Your full quote said to use him as a DH for 100+ games. If you are worried about him being covered through his injuries - how can you assume he wouldn't be injured at the end of the season, going into the playoffs?
    • Here’s an exercise… it’s the postseason and the bases are loaded. The Santa scenario. Who on our current roster would you rather have up over JD Martinez?  Same fact pattern as Santander’s AB. 
    • I think the title of this thread told you his status
    • Why did you pare down my quote about it being for the post season and not just 162?  People, always so quick to clown someone. Lmao. Damn. At least use my whole quote bro.  If you think that we don’t need at least one proven playoff bat then that’s ok. My point is, that we have enough 1B/DH options to carry JD through his ups/downs/injuries over 162 for his experience, leadership, and playoff experience.  You can disagree, but quote me right. 
    • It's kind of amazing to me how no one knows Suarez's free agent status. I've heard it both ways. He's Schrodinger's baseball player.
    • Since JD Martinez has a career OPS of .950 in the postseason across 12 series and 151 plate appearances, I am sure our FO will have no use for him.  A veteran player who has experienced a lot of postseason success rarely helps young teams get to that next level.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...