Jump to content

Orioles compared to other AL East teams


Aglets

Recommended Posts

Update at the All Star Break!

Runs Scored per Game

Toronto - 5.34

New York - 4.65

Baltimore - 4.40

Boston - 4.22

Tampa - 3.65

Runs Allowed per Game

Tampa - 3.75

Baltimore - 3.95

New York - 4.35

Toronto - 4.44

Boston - 4.71

Team ERA

Tampa - 3.56

Baltimore - 3.74

New York - 3.96

Toronto - 4.18

Boston - 4.44

Run differential:

Toronto 0.90

Baltimore 0.45

New York 0.30

Tampa -0.10

Boston -0.49

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply

More regression in all areas this past week. Definitely not encouraging. Figured this might be a decent time to compare things to last year as well to see where we stack up.

2014 ERA: 3.43 (3.74 in 2015)

2014 Runs Allowed: 3.66 / game (3.95 in 2015)

2014 Runs Scored: 4.35 / game (4.40 in 2015)

So overall it definitely seems like poor pitching is the difference, but I can't help but feel like the offensive numbers are misleading as well. I know we've had some blowout win games this year, but it feels like more often we are a team that struggles to score.

For example, despite the 4.40 RS/G trend this season, we've had one game so far in July where we scored more than 4 runs.

We are 14th in the AL so far in July in runs scored, and we were also 4th in April, 14th in May, and 2nd in June so it's hard to know what our true talent level is I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More regression in all areas this past week. Definitely not encouraging. Figured this might be a decent time to compare things to last year as well to see where we stack up.

2014 ERA: 3.43 (3.74 in 2015)

2014 Runs Allowed: 3.66 / game (3.95 in 2015)

2014 Runs Scored: 4.35 / game (4.40 in 2015)

So overall it definitely seems like poor pitching is the difference, but I can't help but feel like the offensive numbers are misleading as well. I know we've had some blowout win games this year, but it feels like more often we are a team that struggles to score.

For example, despite the 4.40 RS/G trend this season, we've had one game so far in July where we scored more than 4 runs.

We are 14th in the AL so far in July in runs scored, and we were also 4th in April, 14th in May, and 2nd in June so it's hard to know what our true talent level is I guess.

I think our true talent is just a little below our overall figure of 4.40 runs/game. The ups and downs have been a bit crazy month-by-month but the overall numbers are about right. Despite our ice-cold RISP performance the last two weeks, we are still hitting .290 with RISP, which is why I say our true talent is a little below where we are.

We are a pretty typical team if you divide our games into higher-scoring vs. lower scoring:

0 runs: O's 7%, AL 6%

1 run: O's 13%, AL 12%

2 runs: O's 15%, AL 17%

3 runs: O's 8%, AL 13%

4 runs: O's 15%, AL 13%

5 runs: O's 13%, AL 10%

6 runs: O's 13%, AL 9%

7 runs: O's 6%, AL 6%

8 runs: O's 6%, AL 6%

9 runs: O's 3%, AL 2%

10+ runs: O's 5%, AL 6%

0-2 runs: O's 34%, AL 35%

3-5 runs: O's 35%, AL 36%

6+ runs: O's 31%, AL 29%

So, we really haven't been shut down more than the average team. It's just that a crazy-high percentage of the games in which we've been shut down came in May and the first two weeks of July.

April: scored 2 runs or less 4 times in 20 games

May: scored 2 runs or less 14 times in 29 games

June: scored 2 runs or less 7 times in 28 games

July: scored 2 runs or less 5 times in 10 games

Slumps suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think our true talent is just a little below our overall figure of 4.40 runs/game. The ups and downs have been a bit crazy month-by-month but the overall numbers are about right. Despite our ice-cold RISP performance the last two weeks, we are still hitting .290 with RISP, which is why I say our true talent is a little below where we are.

We are a pretty typical team if you divide our games into higher-scoring vs. lower scoring:

0 runs: O's 7%, AL 6%

1 run: O's 13%, AL 12%

2 runs: O's 15%, AL 17%

3 runs: O's 8%, AL 13%

4 runs: O's 15%, AL 13%

5 runs: O's 13%, AL 10%

6 runs: O's 13%, AL 9%

7 runs: O's 6%, AL 6%

8 runs: O's 6%, AL 6%

9 runs: O's 3%, AL 2%

10+ runs: O's 5%, AL 6%

0-2 runs: O's 34%, AL 35%

3-5 runs: O's 35%, AL 36%

6+ runs: O's 31%, AL 29%

So, we really haven't been shut down more than the average team. It's just that a crazy-high percentage of the games in which we've been shut down came in May and the first two weeks of July.

April: scored 2 runs or less 4 times in 20 games

May: scored 2 runs or less 14 times in 29 games

June: scored 2 runs or less 7 times in 28 games

July: scored 2 runs or less 5 times in 10 games

Slumps suck.

What is our record in some of those situations compared to other teams? Specifically record when scoring 3 or less? It just feels like to me we are a team that needs to score 4 runs to win because we don't have a shut down rotation.

The Yankees are in 1st because of their hitting not pitching. I mean their bullpen is great but if they don't have leads then that negates that. They had a better starting pitching ERA last year then this season. I am a big Tillman fan and he has really hurt us this year but with that being said a staff like ours that lacks a true ace it isn't a surprise a couple pitchers are stuggling, last year once Gausman was in the rotation everyone was clicking. It is hard to have the whole staff pitching well with a bunch of mid-rotation types making up the staff. The Royals starting pitching is also worse than ours but their pen is so dominant it hasn't hurt them. I just think each team has a certain formula that works for them and we aren't a team that is going to win a lot of 2-1, 3-2 type of games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is our record in some of those situations compared to other teams? Specifically record when scoring 3 or less? It just feels like to me we are a team that needs to score 4 runs to win because we don't have a shut down rotation.

Well, you may be on to something there, though I'm not sure your diagnosis of the reasons is accurate. The O's are only 5-32 (.135) when scoring 3 runs or less, while the league is 259-483 (.349).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at the game yesterday. Chen was capable of outpitching Scherzer but that really isn't his game. He isn't a guy that is going to still be pitching in the 9th. We really only had one mini rally against him and both runs came off of homers. We aren't a team that gets on base a lot so it isn't like we wear down good pitchers. Our pitchers even when pitching well are 6 inning guys. Our formula for success is to hand over a lead in the 7th to our pen. We don't have a staff that is going to win pitchers duels with any regularity. Our offense relies on home runs and quality pitchers don't make as many mistakes. We aren't a team that is built to win those type of games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be curious as to the Orioles record not only this year but going back to 2012 in games where both teams score 3 runs or less and how that compares to the rest of the league.

If you are really that curious, you can look it all up. I already gave you the data for 2015. That came from here: http://www.baseball-reference.com/play-index/inning_summary.cgi?year=2015&team_id=BAL You can just change the year or the team (it has both each separate team and then the AL as a whole as options) and figure it all out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are really that curious, you can look it all up. I already gave you the data for 2015. That came from here: http://www.baseball-reference.com/play-index/inning_summary.cgi?year=2015&team_id=BAL You can just change the year or the team (it has both each separate team and then the AL as a whole as options) and figure it all out.

Baseball reference is all crazy looking on my phone today. Don't know if they are updating something or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pythagorean has us a 48-40 vice our current 44-44. That and the ability to win close games do not appear to be the allies they have been in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More regression in all areas this past week. Definitely not encouraging. Figured this might be a decent time to compare things to last year as well to see where we stack up.

2014 ERA: 3.43 (3.74 in 2015)

2014 Runs Allowed: 3.66 / game (3.95 in 2015)

2014 Runs Scored: 4.35 / game (4.40 in 2015)

So overall it definitely seems like poor pitching is the difference, but I can't help but feel like the offensive numbers are misleading as well. I know we've had some blowout win games this year, but it feels like more often we are a team that struggles to score.

For example, despite the 4.40 RS/G trend this season, we've had one game so far in July where we scored more than 4 runs.

We are 14th in the AL so far in July in runs scored, and we were also 4th in April, 14th in May, and 2nd in June so it's hard to know what our true talent level is I guess.

Didn't you get the memo? The Orioles only hit during even numbered months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty maddening. A more expected value Pythagorean record for us in those games should be 36-9. That's just basically bad luck right?

Although interestingly enough if you filter on our 'expected' Pyth record in those games we still only rank 29th /30.

So basically, the Orioles are really bad at scoring at least 3 runs in games where they allow 3 or less runs.

If we had a more normal distribution overall our record would basically be tied with the Yankees for first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty maddening. A more expected value Pythagorean record for us in those games should be 36-9. That's just basically bad luck right?

Although interestingly enough if you filter on our 'expected' Pyth record in those games we still only rank 29th /30.

So basically, the Orioles are really bad at scoring at least 3 runs in games where they allow 3 or less runs.

If we had a more normal distribution overall our record would basically be tied with the Yankees for first place.

Well, that's the way it goes sometimes. Sometimes when you see a team that is underperforming its pythag, the bullpen is the culprit, but that's hardly the case here. Likewise, our record in one-run games isn't great (12-14), but it's not awful, either. There just seem to have been a lot of games where our pitchers did well but our offense was asleep that day:

2-0

3-2

2-0

3-2

3-1

1-0

3-2

3-0

3-1

2-1

2-1

2-0

1-0

3-2

3-2

We don't have an unusual number of games where we score two runs or less, but we seem to have them at the wrong time. Hopefully, this turns around in the second half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • There probably was no "right" choice and absolutely no "absolutely right choice" I was on record wanting to choose Abrahms and my logic was simple, a 1:1 is a chance to pick a HOF type talent A college catcher was a safe pick and Adley is having a nice career but he is clearly not a MVP/HOF type player.
    • Agreed, Akin is pitching too well to be optioned until there’s no other choices. Tate should certainly be optioned before him. The only reason I could see Akin needing to be optioned is if BOTH Means and Irvin end up in the pen (with Bradish, Kremer and Suárez starting). That’s possibly the best 5 SP right now if they believe Suárez > Means/Irvin. In which case you really can’t have 5 lefty RP and only one RHP to go with Kimbrel and Cano. Otherwise, they should carry 4 lefty RP (with one of Means/Irvin as the long man) before optioning Akin. 
    • The answer to the question is obviously no. Now if the question was would Gunnar have been worthy #1 pick the answer seems obvious that he would have been.    But taking him where he went allowed the Orioles to maximize their draft which is what every team hopes to do.    You can argue whether Adley was the right pick but if Gunnar went first there is no way the two picks work as well for Baltimore. 
    • 1080i video is redrawn a half frame (field) at 60 times per second.  Progressive footage like 1080p is 30 whole frames per second but often converted to interlaced format for transmission. If you are doing this on an ongoing basis, here's a suggestion: download the free version of one of the numerous non-linear editors out there like Avid or DaVinci Resolve and throw the clip on a timeline for your measurement.  Manually clicking through hundreds of frames seems like it would be needlessly cumbersome not to mention slow.  
    • This. I don’t get the Akin going down talk (even though it seems more based off his option remaining than performance). Right now Akin is arguably our 4th most trusted reliever (can argue with Webb) based off his usage and his peripherals are clearly in the top 4 with Cano, Kimbrel, and Coulombe. He might not be a setup guy but he’s a solid piece to have in the middle innings.   Akin’s K-BB% is nearly double that of Baumann’s in both of their careers as relievers. He K’s more, walks less, and gets more chases and whiffs.   Keeping Baumann over Akin even for a week isn’t a move that winning teams make. Not to trash him, but Baumann is just not good, so who cares if he gets claimed? He’s not trusted at this point late in close games unless the bullpen is overused, so if you lose him and need a replacement later in the year you have Heasley, Charles, and Tate (if he gets optioned). Then you also have Wells who should be a bullpen guy when he comes back. Having the flexibility is good but keeping one of your worst relievers just because he doesn’t have an option doesn’t seem like a good way to solve a log jam. 
    • Witt had hit tool questions on draft day, and Abrams was much less of a sure thing than Adley. Based on information known at the time, we absolutely made the right choice with Adley.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...