Roch: Both Flaherty and Hardy are headed to New York.

[Tx Oriole]

Update: As expected, Hardy and Flaherty aren't in Bowie's lineup this morning. They must be headed to New York.

Hope so.

[weams]

Hope so.

[Can_of_corn]

Why no Flaherty at second?Its not like Pearce is crushing the ball, and he still remains a defensive liability compared to Flaherty.Could be a matchup thing.

I don't think Flaherty is eligible to come off until tomorrow.

[weams]

Why no Flaherty at second?Its not like Pearce is crushing the ball, and he still remains a defensive liability compared to Flaherty.Could be a matchup thing.

Looks like Flaherty isn't even on the roster for tonights game.

He is Tomorrow when allowed by MLB.

[mdbdotcom]

Looks like Flaherty isn't even on the roster for tonights game.

Yes, that sticky little thing about not being eligible to come off the DL until tomorrow.

[ledzepp8]

LOL-he was hitting, but "RAKING"? My goodness...I think it is funny how some love to use the argument "small sample size" unless it applies to someone they are making a point for. Amazing.

We all like Flaherty. He has had a LARGE sample size since he has arrived. He is a great asset, he isn't a starter more than likely.

Putting aside whether it's the real Flaherty or not, what do you consider "RAKING"?

[weams]

Putting aside whether it's the real Flaherty or not, what do you consider "RAKING"?

[Frobby]

Putting aside whether it's the real Flaherty or not, what do you consider "RAKING"?

I can't see how .300/.400/.600 isn't raking. Do I expect him to keep it up? No. But the comment was about what Flaherty was going when he got injured.

[ledzepp8]

I can't see how .300/.400/.600 isn't raking. Do I expect him to keep it up? No. But the comment was about what Flaherty was going when he got injured.

Exactly.