Jump to content

Just one word to all the posters who expressed a preference for Caleb over Wieters


mdbdotcom

Recommended Posts

I hope Wieters gets on fire, stays on fire, and then come July, a contending team with some great hitting upper level prospects to burn, has a need at catcher.

With so many free agents at the end of the year, this is the year for DD to cash in and rebuild this club for the future. That doesn't mean he needs to go into total rebuild mode, but it does mean players like Wieters, Chen, Davis, Norris and O'Day could be valuable chips in that effort come July.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I hope Wieters gets on fire, stays on fire, and then come July, a contending team with some great hitting upper level prospects to burn, has a need at catcher.

With so many free agents at the end of the year, this is the year for DD to cash in and rebuild this club for the future. That doesn't mean he needs to go into total rebuild mode, but it does mean players like Wieters, Chen, Davis, Norris and O'Day could be valuable chips in that effort come July.

personally, I would not shocked if DD didn't pull the trigger on one deal.

Nor would I get worked up, if he couldn't find a dance partner.

I do not expect to see a fire sale either, unlike some posters are lobbying for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope Wieters gets on fire, stays on fire, and then come July, a contending team with some great hitting upper level prospects to burn, has a need at catcher.

With so many free agents at the end of the year, this is the year for DD to cash in and rebuild this club for the future. That doesn't mean he needs to go into total rebuild mode, but it does mean players like Wieters, Chen, Davis, Norris and O'Day could be valuable chips in that effort come July.

I hope they pull the trigger. I agree with you, but doubt they will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

personally, I would not shocked if DD didn't pull the trigger on one deal.

Nor would I get worked up, if he couldn't find a dance partner.

I do not expect to see a fire sale either, unlike some posters are lobbying for.

I think we should be sellers if we can get good value. Not a fire sale, but MW or Chen or anyone that they know they won't be signing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope Wieters gets on fire, stays on fire, and then come July, a contending team with some great hitting upper level prospects to burn, has a need at catcher.

With so many free agents at the end of the year, this is the year for DD to cash in and rebuild this club for the future. That doesn't mean he needs to go into total rebuild mode, but it does mean players like Wieters, Chen, Davis, Norris and O'Day could be valuable chips in that effort come July.

A corner OF would be pretty nice.

If MW can bring back a prospect of significance that DD has to consider it.

I am going to be curious to see how DD handles the trade deadline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

personally, I would not shocked if DD didn't pull the trigger on one deal.

Nor would I get worked up, if he couldn't find a dance partner.

I do not expect to see a fire sale either, unlike some posters are lobbying for.

Let's be honest....barring a Bedard like trade, there is NOTHING Duke can do to make everyone happy. If we stand pat, people will say he is not focused on improving the Orioles because he wants to leave for Toronto. If we make trades, we will second guess him until the end of days (see ERod for Miller, Strop and Arrietta for Feldman, etc.). There really is no winning for Duke in this situation, unless we sign Matt to a team friendly 5 year extension. I'm sure Boras would be okay with that. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's be honest....barring a Bedard like trade, there is NOTHING Duke can do to make everyone happy. If we stand pat, people will say he is not focused on improving the Orioles because he wants to leave for Toronto. If we make trades, we will second guess him until the end of days (see ERod for Miller, Strop and Arrietta for Feldman, etc.). There really is no winning for Duke in this situation, unless we sign Matt to a team friendly 5 year extension. I'm sure Boras would be okay with that. ;)

Of course even then that could blow up, see Roberts, B.; Markakis, N. and Hardy, JJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we should be sellers if we can get good value. Not a fire sale, but MW or Chen or anyone that they know they won't be signing.

I think its still just a bit to early to predict if we should be sellers or buyers.

Any deal that could bring in legit near major league talent should be considered. I would not give guys away but if I were DD I would be listening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Matt haters would be up in arms, if they even resigned Matt to a 1 year deal.

Not a MW hater. I would start MW over CJ any day.

That said I am not going to give Matt the 100 million or so it would take to sign him before he hits the market when I got a guy who is serviceable in CJ who can hold the spot down while a few prospects continue to develop.

If the O's had Taylor Teagarden as their next best option then I would be all for doing whatever needs to be done to keep him, reality is CJ can be a solid catcher on a very good team, so the resources are best spent elsewhere IMO. So that is why I would be up in arms, not because of some perceived hate for MW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a MW hater. I would start MW over CJ any day.

That said I am not going to give Matt the 100 million or so it would take to sign him before he hits the market when I got a guy who is serviceable in CJ who can hold the spot down while a few prospects continue to develop.

.

As would I.

But, I have heard so much crapola from the Matt Wieters haters, about how he is a poor pitch framer, and nothing more that replacement level catcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course even then that could blow up, see Roberts, B.; Markakis, N. and Hardy, JJ.

I wouldn't say the Markakis deal blew up. They didn't get the value they were hoping for but I don't think it every hurt the team.

And it's too early to tell with Hardy but obviously the early returns are not good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As would I.

But, I have heard so much crapola from the Matt Wieters haters, about how he is a poor pitch framer, and nothing more that replacement level catcher.

Perhaps less exaggeration on your part would make it seem less like crapola.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • The 2024 Orioles already have a run differential of +114, compared to +129 all last year.  The O’s are on a +260 run pace.  Here’s how that compares with the biggest run differentials in Orioles’ history: 1969 +262 1970 *218 1971 + 214 1973 +193 1979 *175 1980 +165 1966 +154 1983 +147 1996 +131 2023 +129 1975 +129 The 2024 O’s already have passed every other team in Orioles’ history in run differential, 71 games into the season.  Hopefully they can climb a long way up this ladder.
    • This is a very good article that can levels be summed up as pulling the ball in the air is the best thing a hitter can do. It’s why some guys like Isaac Paredes, Jose Ramirez, Nolan Arenado, and even Anthony Santander (to a degree) can outperform their expected numbers, and one of several reasons why xwOBA, xBA, xSLG, etc. aren’t predictive. https://blogs.fangraphs.com/an-meandering-examination-of-fly-ball-pull-rate-featuring-stars-of-the-game-and-also-isaac-paredes/
    • Walker is good but has there been much indication that SFG would trade him? He’s their best reliever and they are only 0.5 games back of a WC spot. Looks like he also has 5 years of control left too. 
    • Feel free to ignore it and not respond.
    • Ok, so let's do it this way. Let's take the uniforms and team names off of the situation. Let's say it's not Orioles vs Yankees. But team A vs team B.  Now in that scenario, you compare the pitching talent of Carlos Rodon vs the talent Irvin/Kremer/Povich, which would you favor objectively? When you have an org with this much talent, my opinion is that we should be beyond being the underdog and relying on magical thinking that lesser talented players will outperform more talented ones. I know that we have been conditioned to that being the case for the last 30- 40 years. But it needn't not be that way anymore IMO.
    • I think this is the real question. I’ll trade those guys but it would be for a real difference maker. Betts, Ohtani, Soto, Judge, Witt Jr, Harper. No seller has a guy with track record of success and degree of certainty. 
    • I agree 100% that you can get relievers without your top prospects. The exception might be a closer.    In regards to a bat, I could see Elias upgrading CF. I don’t know if Getz has learned from being unreasonable yet. But it would be a move that I’m all over if it was my decision. Kjerstad would be the main piece going the other way. Robert is controlled and Kjerstad isn’t particularly strong defensively in the OF. I think Santander can be retained for a reasonable contract if need be. This alignment sends you into the offseason with Cowser at me COF and Robert in CF. You’d have Norby, Stowers, and Billy Cook that could fill your 3-5 OF slots if Santander departs. Plus you’d also have the option of moving O’Hearn to RF  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...