Jump to content

2015 2nd (68) - Jonathan Hughes - RHP - HS (GA)


Recommended Posts

The above is the translation for the below?

Glad it was third pitch and not first like we would usually do for that guy. Especially if someone rated him helium.

No. It was just something I found. As I said. I have no knowledge of this kid. I am glad we did not take him first round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, as a guy who is not really a fan of drafting high school pitchers in the early rounds, I'll wait and see what he ends up doing. Too much injury risk for me, but maybe they are still saving money for something later in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Orioles had those 2 HS kids they drafted rated in the top 50 on their draft board. RHP Hughes was in for private workout, seen by Duquette.</p>— Steve Melewski (@masnSteve) <a href="

">June 9, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Please don't tell me this means they think he is worth slot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Orioles had those 2 HS kids they drafted rated in the top 50 on their draft board. RHP Hughes was in for private workout, seen by Duquette.</p>? Steve Melewski (@masnSteve) <a href="
">June 9, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Well, I'd certainly hope they had Mountcastle ranked in their top 50, considering they picked him 36th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if you see second-round value in a kid that is a consensus round 4-6 pick, that doesn't mean that you should necessarily pick him in the second round. Most likely you could still get him in the third round.

Or maybe not, but the draft is about taking calculated risks.

All it takes is one other team to like him and suddenly he's not there in round 3. And if he were more polished, or maintained his velo better, or had more projection, he'd be gone in the first.

I don't know, I'm not ecstatic about this pick, but his fastball's got some serious life and I love the tilt on the slider. Absolutely no deception in the delivery, though. There's lots of upside here, but it'll take some work to bring it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if you see second-round value in a kid that is a consensus round 4-6 pick, that doesn't mean that you should necessarily pick him in the second round. Most likely you could still get him in the third round.

Or maybe not, but the draft is about taking calculated risks.

Sure, but the team has to judge the risk that some other team will snatch up the player. It's a tricky proposition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So he's the only guy in the top 10 not signed. We speculated that he may have been a slot money savings pick. I'm hoping so. That way we can use whatever savings and tack it on to the 100K you are allowed to spend on guys outside the top 10. If we could get Hughes to sign for half slot then we could throw 400-500K at Pries or Walton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So he's the only guy in the top 10 not signed. We speculated that he may have been a slot money savings pick. I'm hoping so. That way we can use whatever savings and tack it on to the 100K you are allowed to spend on guys outside the top 10. If we could get Hughes to sign for half slot then we could throw 400-500K at Pries or Walton.

...or Morris.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Gametime:  4:05 pm Forecast:  MId 50s to low 60s, cloudy, chance of rain Promotion:  Brandon Hyde Bobblehead, gates open early and music on Eutaw Street Matchup:  JP Sears (L) vs Cole Irvin (L) Lineups Later -- I will not be around, someone else will have to add them  
    • If you "reconstruct the inning without the errors" that means you replay the inning without the ghost runner.   So on that ground ball that got the runner at the plate, you now assume Langeliers would have been thrown out at first.
    • So I looked up the rule book and I can't find anything that says this is the case. Maybe I'm missing it because the rules for unearned runs can be convuluted to say the least. "For purposes of calculating earned runs under Rule 9.16, the runner who begins an inning on second base pursuant to this rule shall be deemed to be a runner who has reached second base because of a fielding error, but no error shall be charged to the opposing team or to any player. For purposes of Rule 9.02, the Official Scorer shall keep records of the number of times each batter and runner is placed at second base in accordance with this rule." In the rulebook under unearned runs it states, "An earned run is a run for which a pitcher is held accountable. In determining earned runs, the Official Scorer shall reconstruct the inning without the errors (which exclude catcher’s interference) and passed balls, giving the benefit of the doubt always to the pitcher in determining which bases would have been reached by runners had there been errorless play. For the purpose of determining earned runs, an intentional base on balls, regardless of the circumstances, shall be construed in exactly the same manner as any other base on balls. (a)  The Official Scorer shall charge an earned run against a pitcher every time a runner reaches home base by the aid of safe hits, sacrifice bunts, a sacrifice fly, stolen bases, putouts, fielder’s choices, bases on balls, hit batters, balks or wild pitches (including a wild pitch on third strike that permits a batter to reach first base) before fielding chances have been offered to put out the offensive team. For the purpose of this rule, a defensive interference penalty shall be construed as a fielding chance. A wild pitch is solely the pitcher’s fault and shall contribute to an earned run just as a base on balls or a balk." I don't see where it states a batter that reaches on a fielder's choice due to a runner being being on due to error.   
    • Joe Posnanski wrote a wonderful book, called “The Baseball 100,” his 100 greatest players. It’s full of wonderful quotes, but it leaves out a quote that is not just all of Baseball in three words, but that applies to all of life. ”Sometimes you suck.” Adam Jones. God bless Adam Jones. Yes, Hyde makes boneheaded decisions almost every game. Yes Mike should have done this or not done that, Yes Cowser shouldn’t have thrown that way, Ryan shouldn’t have missed the fly, yada yada. I was screaming as loud as anyone. My wife said,”I thought you liked baseball,” But now it’s tomorrow.  “Sometimes you suck.” Charge on.
    • Game 4 of Yankees series. It’s one game, but one game could be the difference in the division, having to play in the WC series, and home field advantage.  Things to consider…  How did games 1-3 go versus the NYY?  Should we ease Bradish back in a lower pressure spot so he’s not too amped up for his own good? Do we play matchups and go with a LH SP in OPACY? What happens in Irvin’s start today?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...