Jump to content

Orioles trade Davies for Parra. Your verdict?


PaulFolk

Do you like the Davies for Parra trade?  

193 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you like the Davies for Parra trade?

    • I approve. A small price to pay to fix the O's OF hole with a quality veteran.
    • I disapprove. The O's gave up up a pitching prospect for a rental who won't move the needle.

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

For a much bigger reason, he should have traded more pieces. It's not just about Parra, as the poll was, but bad assessment by the GM.

Nope. You are not in line for the next GM opening. That's not how it works. That's not how any of this works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, I can't blow up a team 1 game out of a playoff spot on July 30th. The goal every season is to make the post season....if you are close you have to go for it....if you are 10 games out of a WC spot, then you sell.

Yeah, I don't see how DD could have blown up the team. As late as August 16, we were in the second wild card position, with (according to BP) a 33% chance of making the playoffs, even considering the difficult remaining schedule we had.

The Parra for Davies trade was another matter, however. Two months of a guy who isn't likely to move the needle very far for six years of a young, cheap pitcher is not a good deal, even if that pitcher only has a 4th/5th starter ceiling that he may or may not attain. Especially when the guy is close to being ready for the majors and your system is thin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I don't see how DD could have blown up the team. As late as August 16, we were in the second wild card position, with (according to BP) a 33% chance of making the playoffs, even considering the difficult remaining schedule we had.

The Parra for Davies trade was another matter, however. Two months of a guy who isn't likely to move the needle very far for six years of a young, cheap pitcher is not a good deal, even if that pitcher only has a 4th/5th starter ceiling that he may or may not attain. Especially when the guy is close to being ready for the majors and your system is thin.

I agree. I do not think Parra was Dan's first choice. If he was, he made a mistake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I don't see how DD could have blown up the team. As late as August 16, we were in the second wild card position, with (according to BP) a 33% chance of making the playoffs, even considering the difficult remaining schedule we had.

The Parra for Davies trade was another matter, however. Two months of a guy who isn't likely to move the needle very far for six years of a young, cheap pitcher is not a good deal, even if that pitcher only has a 4th/5th starter ceiling that he may or may not attain. Especially when the guy is close to being ready for the majors and most your system is thin.

Most weren't (at least me) saying blow it up, but trading a few pieces would have been a savvy move and Parra was just completely unnecessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most weren't (at least me) saying blow it up, but trading a few pieces would have been a savvy move and Parra was just completely unnecessary.

Na. They were saying it. You just don't do it when you are trying to win it all. As the Orioles front office was. They just made a mistake in who they got. That's all. There were no pieces to be traded off. Savvy is not a word that you could use for that in the present as opposed to hindsight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He might not be cracking the rotation because they want that added year of team control.

I guess they have desire to win this year. Or do they jus bring him up like the Cubs did with Bryant.

Do you really bury a starting pitcher in the minors, who is major league ready? Doesn't sound like a plan to win

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess they have desire to win this year. Or do they jus bring him up like the Cubs did with Bryant.

Do you really bury a starting pitcher in the minors, who is major league ready? Doesn't sound like a plan to win

He misses a few starts and you get a whole extra year of team control.

Sounds like a plan to win to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • They will probably go after Sugano the 35 year old at the end of his career as he is cheaper and no posting fee.  
    • David Ortiz also commanded the strike zone.  He didn't swing at a lot of junk.  He got his pitch or the pitcher made a mistake, he hit it.  Pitchers will let you get yourself out all day if you swing at pitches repeatedly out of the zone.  We need to do a better job of this.  
    • Elias has said that he and his staff are (or will be) making an exhaustive inquiry to identify the sources of this team's underperformance -- which I take to mean not just the playoff defeats, but also the underperformance during the second half of the sentence. Sounds good.  But at the same time, before that investigation has gotten underway, Elias has announced that Hyde will be back next year. I believe many of the criticisms of Hyde's in-game decisions, lack of fire, failure to take action in response to boneheaded baserunning, etc., etc. -- including my own -- have been exaggerated. But Hyde does seem, to me anyway, to have shortcomings as a manager. I really don't know whether any of this team's problems could be alleviated by bringing in a new manager with qualities that Hyde lacks. But if Elias is serious about a top-to-bottom review of the team's weaknesses and ways that those weaknesses might be improved on, shouldn't the manager's stewardship  be among the subjects considered? It appears that Elias intends to scrutinize and look for constructive changes throughout the organization. Except the manager. I don't get it.
    • So where did it go wrong, if it’s tough to pin it on bad swing decisions?  I still think an injury (or multiple smaller injuries) is possible, if not probable. Evaluating the possibility of a hand injury, here are his Statcast numbers from the two weeks prior to and following that incident on June 27: 2022-2023: 37.8% hard hit rate; 88.2 MPH avg. EV; .353 wOBA 06/12 - 06/26: 43.8% hard hit rate; 89.8 MPH avg. EV; .356 wOBA 06/28 - 07/14: 20.5% hard hit rate; 83.6 MPH avg. EV; .214 wOBA Coming into June 27, Adley was hitting the ball harder than he ever had. He was actually hitting it even harder in the week prior to June 27 than what I showed above. After that ball off his hand, those hard contact numbers instantly fell off, in a pretty dramatic fashion. And they never really came back.  07/14 - 09/30: 30.0% hard hit rate; 86.9 MPH avg. EV; .258 wOBA I don’t think it’s quite proof positive that he was playing with a broken hand or that type of thing. But it’s very suspicious that his performance immediately fell off a cliff after getting hit with that foul ball and really never again returned to anything approaching normal for him.
    • Interesting way to frame it.    That said didn’t need much to beat KC at least.  
    • If even remotely healthy they are absolutely WS contenders. 
    • I was trying to recall last year how long it took. How long was it?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...