Jump to content

vs. Purdue


ArtVanDelay

Recommended Posts

Great intensity today, from a standpoint of watching the battle and the defense not a bad game to watch.

After watching that awful few minutes by Checko, I think I'd much rather see Be dee out there in his minutes. As many have said our bench is an issue and they need to find help from somewhere else.

let's keep getting the W's and lock in a number one or two seed for the tournament

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Great effort all around, sometimes the open 3's just don't fall.

Watching the last 5 minutes of the Duke game in contrast to this was laughable. Even when the game was close, those ACC refs love using their whistles. Big Ten seems to let a lot more go for better or worse. For the most part, I like watching them play, unless it's a really bad call (well that Layman one was bad).

Also, I know Tony mentioned a lot of players don't improve much under Turgeon. I'll say this, and maybe this doesn't qualify, but Stone is a totally different defender and rebounder than he was early. I'm not talking about the 8 blocks against Nebraska. But he was really establishing himself down there today and a couple of times refused Hammon the ball inside, which turned out to be huge. He got caught a couple times that seemed to be a senior just getting the better of a freshman, but his footwork and placement inside is much much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great effort all around, sometimes the open 3's just don't fall.

Watching the last 5 minutes of the Duke game in contrast to this was laughable. Even when the game was close, those ACC refs love using their whistles. Big Ten seems to let a lot more go for better or worse. For the most part, I like watching them play, unless it's a really bad call (well that Layman one was bad).

Also, I know Tony mentioned a lot of players don't improve much under Turgeon. I'll say this, and maybe this doesn't qualify, but Stone is a totally different defender and rebounder than he was early. I'm not talking about the 8 blocks against Nebraska. But he was really establishing himself down there today and a couple of times refused Hammon the ball inside, which turned out to be huge. He got caught a couple times that seemed to be a senior just getting the better of a freshman, but his footwork and placement inside is much much better.

Agree here. So many reasons I would love to see Stone stick around another year. One of them is how dominant he could be with another offseason of shaping his body. He has cut almost all his "baby fat" down and is so much leaner when he first arrived. Now he needs to add muscle to it. He still gets pushed off the post a little too easy by some of the big men in the big ten. With an offseason of working on that body, he could be truly dominant offensively and very good defensively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Before the great purge in the 1990s* the umps more-or-less did whatever they wanted. They'd interview an ump and he'd say things like "the strike zone is what I say the strike zone is." There would be talk of reforming things and the umps and their union basically just said no. We're the umpires, goldang it, and we control what goes on. Wrong call? Missed something? Bullcrap, we're the best umps in the world, how dare you question us? And until HDTV and cameras everywhere, and tracking systems in the last ~20 years it was often hard to tell just how good or bad they were. But now, with Statcast everywhere, even in the minors, and HD broadcasts of every game, it's a whole new world. Umpires have been graded on balls/strikes for many years. They just accept that the whole world knows more-or-less objectively if they were right or wrong in near real time. They can't hide. Truly terrible, belligerent, rogue umps don't exist like they did when I was a kid. That's why Angel and one or two others stand out. But they'd have been mid-pack or better in the 1990s. There can still be improvements, but umpiring is better than it's ever been. * Remember there was some kind of work stoppage and the umps resigned en masse, and the owners called their bluff and accepted the resignations. When the umps came crawling back the owners only brought back the ones they liked.)
    • To record outs efficiently in September and October.
    • His command of all of his pitches is not great, but they seemed improved from last year. Some of the stuff is real good, but he still looks more like a potential bullpen guy than a starter to me.
    • Why would we trade a starting pitcher prospect for a reliever?
    • Did anyone think to look at the Statcast data before wondering out loud if the O's should pick up a guy like Pillar? The last 3-4 years even his range, which is really his calling card, is roughly average, maybe a tick above. The last time his OAA was off the charts was 2016. You know, when Brian Matusz and Ubaldo were still on the Os. You have to squint pretty hard to see the advantages Pillar brings over McKenna.
    • Its one of the byproducts of playing .600+ ball for a month. Here are AL relievers by games pitched so far (holy cow what is Oakland doing with TJ McFarland!) https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders/major-league?pos=all&lg=al&qual=y&type=8&season=2024&month=0&season1=2024&ind=0&stats=rel&sortcol=5&sortdir=default&pagenum=1 CLE - Barlow, Sandlin, Gaddis, Clase BAL - Cano, Coulombe, Webb, Kimbrel NYY is leaning on Holmes. Certainly the next 3 games could shift heavily if Yennier or Holmes gets attrited more quickly. If SP returns are friendly to the Orioles in the coming months, Elias can really focus on the RP market.    Is it too early Eduardo style to start thinking about what RP rentals he would give up Cade Povich for?     Cade Povich for Ryan Pressly, Cade Povich for Ryan Helsley.    David Bednar with a bunch of years is more. The reward if you can lock up your division is everyone can go to the spa for September.
    • I agree with what you said about Hays. It minimizes Cowser’s exposure/limitations.  However, I cannot agree with your Cedric Mullins’ take. We don’t have another OF we can cover CF anywhere as well. For whatever we would be loosing in defensive value, the offensive uptick would have to be considerable in order to do that. Mullins is that good in CF IMO.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...