Jump to content

No way Kauffman is better than OPACY ... come on guys, let's fix this ....


OrioleMagic79

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I'm guessing the same Royals fans who flooded the All Star Voting somehow found their way to this contest too. Camden Yards is a classic. It vs Fenway in the final seems appropriate.

Please. PNC is way better than Fenway. I am of the opinion that PNC is the best stadium in baseball. Fenway isn't even in the top 5. Terrible concourses, tiny seats, etc. Not to mention being surrounded by Red Sox fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can vote as many times as you want, just refresh your browser and vote again ... we can't let Royals fans pull what they did in the ASG last summer, because Kauffman is nowhere near the park that OPACY is ... who's with me???

http://www.sportsonearth.com/article/172358260/vote-mlb-stadium-competition-final-four

Sorry but I haven't been to either stadium. If I were voting I would vote just once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please. PNC is way better than Fenway. I am of the opinion that PNC is the best stadium in baseball. Fenway isn't even in the top 5. Terrible concourses, tiny seats, etc. Not to mention being surrounded by Red Sox fans.

Gotta agree! I've also heard it smells like urine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry but I haven't been to either stadium. If I were voting I would vote just once.

That's noble of you, but we are head to head with Royals fans ... they vote as often as possible, and for things/players that don't even deserve it ... OPACY is WAY better than Kauffman, which isn't usually even in this conversation but for their over aggressive fans ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please. PNC is way better than Fenway. I am of the opinion that PNC is the best stadium in baseball. Fenway isn't even in the top 5. Terrible concourses, tiny seats, etc. Not to mention being surrounded by Red Sox fans.

Fenway seats are hard and tiny.I could not move my legs down the left field line.They did make many seats bigger. AT&T and PNC are the best.Camden Yards has some misaligned seats and some seats are tiny.Probably rank it fourth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah can't believe Kaufman got this far. It looks more like a AAA stadium than an MLB stadium. That backdrop is awful, that's why they don't show a picture of it. I like the scoreboard and the fountains are a nice touch but that's about it.

Also PNC should win the contest. Only ballpark I'd put over OPACY. That back drop is :hearts:

Fenway has the history but other than that it's an awful ballpark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fenway seats are hard and tiny.I could not move my legs down the left field line.They did make many seats bigger. AT&T and PNC are the best.Camden Yards has some misaligned seats and some seats are tiny.Probably rank it fourth.

See if AT&T got rid of the giant Coke bottle and Glove in the LCF, it would be #2-3 for me. But those two things ruin the wonderful view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have never been to kauffman in KC then you probably cannot appreciate it. It is a fantastic venue. Sparkling clean, awesome amenities and the best parking you can imagine. That said, Camden Yards is better, a truly special ballpark that wins my vote. Fenway has the history, and so does Wrigley. But both of those places also have the bad that comes with the old..Like poor seating, parking, etc. I know that this site does not have any love for KC, but they play in a fantastic park.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have never been to kauffman in KC then you probably cannot appreciate it. It is a fantastic venue. Sparkling clean, awesome amenities and the best parking you can imagine. That said, Camden Yards is better, a truly special ballpark that wins my vote. Fenway has the history, and so does Wrigley. But both of those places also have the bad that comes with the old..Like poor seating, parking, etc. I know that this site does not have any love for KC, but they play in a fantastic park.

I have heard good things since the renovation. I tried to see it when I drove back across the country in May 2009 but the weather didn't cooperate. It is on my list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have never been to kauffman in KC then you probably cannot appreciate it. It is a fantastic venue. Sparkling clean, awesome amenities and the best parking you can imagine. That said, Camden Yards is better, a truly special ballpark that wins my vote. Fenway has the history, and so does Wrigley. But both of those places also have the bad that comes with the old..Like poor seating, parking, etc. I know that this site does not have any love for KC, but they play in a fantastic park.

I was there last Friday vs the Twins. I've been to dozens of games at OPACY. There is no comparison, but The K is great experience. We got pictures with the WS trophy and the HOF in LF is great for fans. I've never seen folks tailgate for hours before MLB before I moved here. Sharing facilities with the Chiefs certainty helps with that.

Sent from my SM-T537V using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Soto has had 6 years in the majors. Only 2 of them with an ERA under 4 and he's averaged a 100 ERA+. He has a career FIP of nearly 4. A career WHIP of over 1.4. Why is that valuable? Yeah, he can go on dominant runs. But so could Bryan Baker.  That's worth clogging up a spot and not getting somebody more consistent and...well...better?
    • Taking a look at 2023 vs 2024 FANGRAPHS WAR, some interesting directional info.  (Acknowledging that WAR is not definitivve,  FG uses FIPERA for Pitcher WAR).  This is meant to highlight areas of opportunity not a deep dive on data.  Highlighted 5 key areas:   1) TOR/Ace role /Burns FA.  All other roles 2-6 are likely fine.  Bradish coming back in 2nd half of 2025 would be a boost but should not be counted on.   Going into 2025 w/o sourcing a 4 WAR type of replacement for Burns would be a huge miss.    Most important decision/move for 2025.  2) Need to solidify closer and BP which is hopefully Felix coming back strong but should not depend on 2023 dominance.  Need a deep pen with reliable depth in minors and assume more trade deadline reinforcements.   Plenty of good options here, spend $ smartly but don't depend solely on waiver claims.  3) Adley - none of Elias' 2024 calculus included AR's huge 2nd half dropoff.    If he does not come back strong, may have to re-think AR contribution and make up for any defecit in other positions.  If Gunnar is a 10 and Adley's a 4 WAR we are more than fine, should not assume Adley is a 5+WAR player.  4) Santander - How is he best replaced.  Elevate Heston and pair him with a RH platoon partner who can back-up all three OF postions.  Not an easy find but needs to be impactful - a RH bat, preferably a high OBP type- that player does not exist in the org in terms of 2025 readiness.     Supposedly that's why Mayo is so highly valued as a RH  bat which is why not developing him as an OFer is curious.  5) Jackson Holliday - Biggest upside story for 2025.  Expect to see major improvement and the type of bat the lineup needs.  Should be settled in, got to experience the post season without playing but a lot of the Elias' plan/process is JH becoming a very good player.   
    • I don't get the idea of not wanting Soto back. First of all, lets talk about money.  He probably gets around $6M in arb for 2025. 37 relievers made 6M or more in 2024. 56 made 4M or more.  A 1/6 deal for him isnt bad and its not a long term commitment, which is a huge plus. After his 2 awful outings after he got here, Soto appeared in 20 games. He threw 16.1 innings and had a 1.10 ERA. He gave up 1 homer, walked 4, 11 hits and struck out 20.  For the season, his ERA was a mediocre 4.42 but his FIP was 3.68, his K rate was over 11 and his HR rate was .68. The issue is the walks. He is still only 29 years old, has over 60 appearances each of the last 4 years (ie he's durable) and he has very good seasons in the past. Even last year, when his ERA was 4.62, his xERA was 2.79 and his FIP was 3.59. With his ability to get Ks and miss bats and the upside he has, taking the chance on him for 1/6 is a risk you would be foolish not to take.
    • Haha. Our reliever with the lowest FIP & WHIP and highest K/BB rate.
    • Akin is discussed above. Pretty sure he is out of options as of this year. But I am far from a roster nerd.  Cano and Felix do have options but they are not the type of guys you would option assuming they are performing at a high level, only if they struggle. We are not going to want to option them just to get through a bullpen day or manage rest. 
    • It's a tough question. Akin stunk/hurt in 2023, this year he was very good in medium/low leverage situations. Suarez is a starter *and* was effective in relief. I don't know, think I'd rather have Suarez, tbh.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...