Jump to content

Sunday, April 27th @ Chicago White Sox


The Rick

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 167
  • Created
  • Last Reply
God I wish they'd go out and try to get somebody. I can't stand another year of the same dead-assed, impotent lineup. 10th in BA, 11th in runs scored, 11th in OBP...doesn't it get old?

The only stat that matters is wins and losses. Right now we're doing pretty well at that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only stat that matters is wins and losses. Right now we're doing pretty well at that one.

No kidding.

In the winter, everybody was saying how losing 100 was just fine with them, just so we trade Erik and Miggi... and I was thinking, "Yeah, people are gonna be fine with losing, uh-huh, sure they are..." Meanwhile, the team's in 1st place and people do nothing but complain. Can you imagine what it's gonna be like around here when they get in a losing streak?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that we're supposed to be rebuilding, Pushmonkey. So why don't we try doing it instead of sending Millars, Huffs and Moras out there game after game? It w/b one thing if we had talent in the minors that was close. But there's nothing above Frederick.

Rshack, I don't care about wins and losses. But when you have gaping holes in your lineup and the same holes in the minor league system, then it's time to make some moves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No kidding.

In the winter, everybody was saying how losing 100 was just fine with them, just so they trade Erik and Miggi... and I was thinking, "Yeah, people are gonna be fine with losing, uh-huh, sure they are..." Meanwhile, the team's in 1st place and people do nothing but complain. Can you imagine what it's gonna be like around here when they get in a losing streak?

Maybe they're irate because Brian's still here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe they're irate because Brian's still here?

I don't think so. I think that's just a very small (and, IMO, wacko) minority. My theory is that some folks just aren't emotionally equipped very well to cope with baseball ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that we're supposed to be rebuilding, Pushmonkey. So why don't we try doing it instead of sending Millars, Huffs and Moras out there game after game? It w/b one thing if we had talent in the minors that was close. But there's nothing above Frederick.

So are they supposed to waive a magic wand and get prospects to replace Millar, Huff and Mora? I do tend to think MacPhail has been a little too focused on getting pitching prospects in the trades he's made, but he only has/had so many chips to trade. You can't repair 10 years worth of damage all at once. The best chance to make it go as quickly as possible is to build some value for guys like Millar, Huff, Mora, Payton and Ramon so that you can try to trade them for a prospect each at the deadline. Obviously that's far from guaranteed to work, but I don't know what a better option would be given what we had to start with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think so. I think that's just a very small (and, IMO, wacko) minority. My theory is that some folks just aren't emotionally equipped very well to cope with baseball ;-)

I also think it's just the simple fact that people (myself included) exaggerate when posting on message boards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Still a lot of things to shake out this year that IMO affects this decision.   1. Is Silent J the heir apparent to RF? 2. Is Beavers taking the next step and showing as a viable starting OF? 3. Is Fabian taking the next step to be a legit 4th OF who can play all 3 positions?   I will be very surprised if Taters is on the team next year. Honestly I think that if he is it will be due to failure of the young guys to show out. Good thing for us is we have enough of them that I don’t think that will happen.
    • He said after the game that he has five pitches, and if any three of them are working on a given night, he can mix them up enough to get batters out.  
    • He’s had quite the turnaround vs. LHP on this road trip.  Hopefully it continues all year!
    • Gunnar's definitely looking like the MVP of the Orioles and looks like priority #1 to me to get an extension. Burnes age works against him, because the O's maybe don't want to go longer than 5-6 years at most, but I could be wrong there. The Witt extension kind of set the parameters of what Gunnar will probably want at minimum. 2025 25 Kansas City Royals $8,111,111     2026 26 Kansas City Royals $14,111,111     2027 27 Kansas City Royals $20,111,111     2028 28 Kansas City Royals $31,111,111     2029 29 Kansas City Royals $36,111,111     2030 30 Kansas City Royals $36,111,111     2031 31 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2032 32 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2033 33 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2034 34 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2035 35 Kansas City Royals *$33,000,000   $33M Team Option 2036 36 Kansas City Royals *$28,000,000   $28M Team Option 2037 37 Kansas City Royals *$28,000,000   $28M Team
    • It is probably thin because of the short career lifespan is for those positions, which is why there is no way Mullins should be extended.
    • Gunnar Henderson's splits through first 97 ABs of the season:   Home -- .326 / .385 / .630 Away -- .294 / .362 / .667 Vs. LH -- .324 / .395 / .622 Vs. RH -- .300 / .358 / .667
    • I don't think the point was to trash Holliday but to question the reliability of the metric. I share the question about Holliday's OAA. He hasn't been bad but I can't think of a single plus play and OAA thinks he is the best defender on the team.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...