Jump to content

Sunday, April 27th @ Chicago White Sox


The Rick

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 167
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I think that Mora bunt was a bunt for a hit but if it wasn't success it still worked as a sacrifice. However, with Robert's speed I would give him a few pitches to see Contreras's move to first and give him 3 pitches to steal. Definitely too early to be bunting when we've scored 5 runs in the past two games we're scoring runs don't need to play for 1 in the first inning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Melvin bunts Roberts over to 2nd for the 1st out of the game. Play was somewhat close at 1st but a little early to be bunting.

Seriously, especially when Contreras is lousy at holding runners on and was already having a little control trouble. Terrible idea. Melvin should have been looking to take pitches there, not make any kind of contact with the first one. Roberts looked kind of annoyed when he was looking down at the third base coach after he got to second.

Melvin should be fined every time he bunts in the first inning, even if he is trying to do it for a hit. Stupid, stupid play that kept us from any chance of having a big inning. :mad:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that Mora bunt was a bunt for a hit but if it wasn't success it still worked as a sacrifice. However, with Robert's speed I would give him a few pitches to see Contreras's move to first and give him 3 pitches to steal. Definitely too early to be bunting when we've scored 5 runs in the past two games we're scoring runs don't need to play for 1 in the first inning.

Yeah, no doubt that he was trying to reach 1st on the bunt, but Mora hasn't been able to do that in a while. He's getting older, not younger.

Roberts had an 8 pitch AB and Mora was able to see what Contreras was throwing, not to mention we're very familiar with him. Bunting there, that early makes absolutely no sense. Par for the course for Melvin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that Mora bunt was a bunt for a hit but if it wasn't success it still worked as a sacrifice. However, with Robert's speed I would give him a few pitches to see Contreras's move to first and give him 3 pitches to steal. Definitely too early to be bunting when we've scored 5 runs in the past two games we're scoring runs don't need to play for 1 in the first inning.

It definitely wasn't a designed sacrifice, that was Mora trying to bunt for a hit. How do I know that? Because if it were a designed sacrifice, why did Roberts do a "fake" take off for second on the pitch? Another case of Mora doing something stupid for his own oddball reasoning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • They do mean different things.  “The call stands” means it was too close to overturn.  “The call is confirmed” means they feel the replay clearly supports the call on the field. Joe Adell was safe at 2B.   They felt it was too close to overturn and said “The call stands” because it clearly didn’t support the call.
    • Rundown on the players Peter Bendix desired enough here to pull the trigger on a May trade. Dillon Head 10.11.2004 commanded a $2.8M bonus as a high schooler...maybe Gunnar Henderson raw material just starting his pro career. Jakob Marsee 6.28.2001, a $250k college bat, and Nathan Martorella 2.18.2001, a $325k college bat, less than half what Kyle Stowers commanded.    Mid level college guys doing fairly well. Woo-Suk Go 8.26.1998 closed for 5 years in the KBO, and has been an average reliever on his AA Texas League team opening the season.
    • O'Hearn actually has a career .748 OPS versus LHSP in 157 PA. It's the near helplessness against LHRP in 41 PA that makes it look like he can't hit lefties. He's around .080 OPS lower against lefties in his minor-league career, which is roughly the average platoon advantage split. I don't think it's some foregone conclusion he can't hit lefties. Maybe he doesn't need to the way our roster is constructed, but I think the idea he can't hit lefties deserves some scrutiny.
    • Imagine starting a pool that goes 99% in one direction, and then trying to insult other posters as “facebook quality”
    • I think that if you're looking out beyond this season, you have to add to the calculation that there's maybe a 2% chance Means returns after this season, and probably only a 0.000001% chance that Burnes does.  So the SP log jam isn't quite as jammy as it currently appears.  
    • I'm not against trading for Scott, or any other reliever at some point, but there's a bit of a jam at starting pitching for a moment. A couple of guys are going to be in the pen soon. Plus we don't have any idea about Grayson and when he'll be back.    There's always work to do on a BP for most teams, but I think they'll exercise some patience until the starting pitching clears up.
    • Fair question.  Before coming to the Orioles, vs. RHP O’Hearn had a .706 OPS (.228/.302/.414), whereas as an Oriole he has an .842 OPS vs. RHP (.303/.342/.500).   So, that’s an OPS improvement of 136 points.   Versus LHP, O’Hearn was a .492 OPS hitter in KC (.163/.244/.248).  As an Oriole, he has a .192/.206/.538 OPS vs. LHP for a .744 OPS.  That’s in 34 PA, so tiny sample size there.   My inclination is to think that given more PA vs. LHP, O’Hearn might improve from the .492 OPS guy he was vs. LHP to something like a .650 guy.   To me, that’s not good enough to bother with.  I’d just leave him in the role where he’s excelling.   
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...