Jump to content

Updates on Hunter Harvey


Norfolk orioles

Recommended Posts

o

 

After ceding a one-out Triple Harvey struck out Adam Eaton, walked the Anthony Rendon And Juan Soto, and then stranded the bases loaded by striking out Asdrubal Cabrera.

 

 

3 OUTS: ) 2 Strikeouts, 1 Groundout

 

HUNTER LUKE HARVEY )))))) (vs. NATIONALS, 8/27)

IP:ll.1

H:lllll 1 ) (1 Triple)

R:lllll 0

BB:lll2

SO:ll.2

Pitches: )l 33 (19 )Strikes,  )14 )Balls)

2019 ERA: )l 0.00  )l  4.00 IP  (0 ER)

2019 WHIP: )l 1.250  )l  4.00 P  (5 H/BB)

2019 OPPONENTS BATTING AVG: )l .143 )l (2 for 14)

 

PITCHES BY INNING

*******************

33 ll(19 llStrikes, lll14 lllBalls)

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to say it... it was pretty reckless of Hyde to keep Harvey out there for 30+ pitches in an inning. His FB was good but he was laboring through the tough part of the lineup. He should’ve been pulled after Rendon. Instead he faced Soto and then Cabrera. 

Hyde is kind of an idiot for that. 

Hyde was the only guy willing to take the job and I can’t wait till he’s gone. He’s nothing more than Bo Porter 2.0. 

  • Confused 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I have to say it... it was pretty reckless of Hyde to keep Harvey out there for 30+ pitches in an inning. His FB was good but he was laboring through the tough part of the lineup. He should’ve been pulled after Rendon. Instead he faced Soto and then Cabrera. 

Hyde is kind of an idiot for that. 

Hyde was the only guy willing to take the job and I can’t wait till he’s gone. He’s nothing more than Bo Porter 2.0. 

What’s your logic for calling it idiotic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LookinUp said:

Only threw 2 so far. They were bad. Needs something slower than a 91 mph change maybe?

No, he doesn’t. Zach Greinke was throwing a CH (87 mph) only a few miles down from what his FB (91/92 mph) was a couple years ago. 

What’s more important is that it’s action (armside run, tumbling away from a LHB) is good (it was). Now, he needs to be consistent. 

I also am not certain he’s done with starting. Despite his enthusiasm, he doesn’t decide. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I have to say it... it was pretty reckless of Hyde to keep Harvey out there for 30+ pitches in an inning. His FB was good but he was laboring through the tough part of the lineup. He should’ve been pulled after Rendon. Instead he faced Soto and then Cabrera. 

Hyde is kind of an idiot for that. 

Hyde was the only guy willing to take the job and I can’t wait till he’s gone. He’s nothing more than Bo Porter 2.0. 

I thought it was brilliant. Got a chance to see what he’s made of in that type of situation. 

He was a starter. Do you really think 30 pitches for one day is putting him at risk? Heck, for how often he’s been injured maybe they should have him on a strict 10 pitch per inning limit.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LookinUp said:

Only threw 2 so far. They were bad. Needs something slower than a 91 mph change maybe?

He has a curveball, (the 83 mph pitch) it can be very good at times, he’s be facing a lot of lefties so he hasn’t been throwing it much. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I have to say it... it was pretty reckless of Hyde to keep Harvey out there for 30+ pitches in an inning. His FB was good but he was laboring through the tough part of the lineup. He should’ve been pulled after Rendon. Instead he faced Soto and then Cabrera. 

Hyde is kind of an idiot for that. 

Hyde was the only guy willing to take the job and I can’t wait till he’s gone. He’s nothing more than Bo Porter 2.0. 

With a post like this and you are calling Hyde the idiot?

 

The man has more baseball sense coming out of his used socks than you do coming out of your keyboard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, AceKing said:

With a post like this and you are calling Hyde the idiot?

 

The man has more baseball sense coming out of his used socks than you do coming out of your keyboard

Oh jeez, the classic response. Let me ask you this,

Why are we on a message board talking about baseball if we can’t question decisions?  

Here’s the logic behind it... There’s usually a hard rule in the minors that you don’t let a P throw 30-35 pitches in a single inning. Especially in relief.

Harvey’s barely pitched in 5 years, why get into any risky scenario with him?????

What did we learn from this outing?  That Harvey can get players like Parra and Cabrera out, but then pitch around everyone else?  Some big learning experience. 

Harvey should have been pulled after Rendon. He was at 25 pitches and was starting to show a dip in velo. 99-100 to 96-97 on the FB. 

We’re just going to have to agree to disagree. I think it’s irresponsible and idiotic, to have any P throw 33 pitches in an inning. Especially when they are a prospect and have been injury plagued. In a meaningless game.

If you disagree with that, well then I guess you read Dusty Baker’s “how to” book. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Oh jeez, the classic response. Let me ask you this,

Why are we on a message board talking about baseball if we can’t question decisions?  

Here’s the logic behind it... There’s usually a hard rule in the minors that you don’t let a P throw 30-35 pitches in a single inning. Especially in relief.

Harvey’s barely pitched in 5 years, why get into any risky scenario with him?????

What did we learn from this outing?  That Harvey can get players like Parra and Cabrera out, but then pitch around everyone else?  Some big learning experience. 

Harvey should have been pulled after Rendon. He was at 25 pitches and was starting to show a dip in velo. 99-100 to 96-97 on the FB. 

We’re just going to have to agree to disagree. I think it’s irresponsible and idiotic, to have any P throw 33 pitches in an inning. Especially when they are a prospect and have been injury plagued. In a meaningless game.

If you disagree with that, well then I guess you read Dusty Baker’s “how to” book. 

I think you have good point but your language is a little strong.   Hyde has done well in a tough situation this year.  He and Elias seem on the same page.   If Elias agrees with what Hyde did with Harvey tonight then that is two really good baseball minds at work. If Elias does not agree then I am sure he will tell Hyde.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I think you have good point but your language is a little strong.   Hyde has done well in a tough situation this year.  He and Elias seem on the same page.   If Elias agrees with what Hyde did with Harvey tonight then that is two really good baseball minds at work. If Elias does not agree then I am sure he will tell Hyde.

Sorry for calling him an idiot.

What about Hyde’s decision to leave DJ Stewart in the game as well?

Just to point out the irony... Calling Hyde an idiot is “too tough”, but Hyde risking our players physical health is just “testing them”.   

Hyde also got into a very public dust up with Chris Davis. I guess that’s ok because it’s the whipping boy Chris Davis. 

Let’s just say Hyde isn’t making the best of decisions over the last couple of weeks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I have to say it... it was pretty reckless of Hyde to keep Harvey out there for 30+ pitches in an inning. His FB was good but he was laboring through the tough part of the lineup. He should’ve been pulled after Rendon. Instead he faced Soto and then Cabrera. 

Hyde is kind of an idiot for that. 

Hyde was the only guy willing to take the job and I can’t wait till he’s gone. He’s nothing more than Bo Porter 2.0. 

 

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Oh jeez, the classic response. Let me ask you this,

Why are we on a message board talking about baseball if we can’t question decisions?  

Question away.  But I'd hope we can do that in a rational manner.  You act like 10 additional pitches in an inning is the difference between a solid manager and someone who only has the job because he was flat dumb enough to hitch his career to a floundering franchise.

This isn't a black-and-white on-off switch.  Managing isn't a series of logic gates, all OR'd together, and if one gets tripped it's firing time.  It's more like a collection of heat maps, all quasi-subjectively defined.  Last night Hyde ventured a tiny bit into a red area of your personal heat map for pitcher use and WHAM he's an idiot who couldn't be gone fast enough.

Hyde seems like a pretty reasonable, decent guy who was selected by a smart GM to help the team get through rebuilding.  He might be a caretaker manager, he might not be around for the next good O's team, but we don't know that for sure.  And I'm quite confident that the O's had way more applicants for his job than they could interview.  It's one of 30 major league managerial positions making $hundreds of thousands of dollars a year, with no expectations and pressure to win.  Almost every minor league manager and half of every major league coaching staff would have taken the position.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'll be honest, the playoffs didn't put me in a happy mood and reading this board has only made it worse.  The amount of people, many well respected, with over the top, outrageous takes calling guys "losers" and "chokers" etc. is ridiculous imo.  This reads more like a football board than a baseball board, and that's not a compliment. I'm kind of at a loss for what they should do to be honest.  The 2nd half drop-off imo is mostly explained by the injuries, particularly on the mound, and Adley's inexplicable performance.  If they were to run the team back with some minimal upgrades to the rotation and pen, sans Burnes and Santander, I think that's a team that could/should win 95ish games and compete for the division.  But there's downside there too.  And if you get Adley of the 2nd half, then you might be looking more at 85ish wins and missing the playoffs. However, I see a lot of schizophrenic and illogical takes on the board.  A lot of people are calling for a "veteran hitter" for the lineup; many of those same people are all too happy to let Santander walk.  Some are calling to not just "hand jobs to young guys;" many of these people were the loudest in demanding more aggressive promoting of prospects. I'm just generally down on the tenor of the board, and personally, I don't have any crazy strong feelings about what I think the O's should or should not do, which is fairly unusual for me.
    • The Phillies are profitable.  The Mets and the Padres are the only two teams that have really done aggressive “deficit-spending” in pursuit of a ring in the last few years.
    • If someone pays Burnes 400 mil or anything close. I think there are owners out there that haven't learned anything and have more money that brains. Don't get me wrong - Burnes is a good pitcher but that's it he is a good pitcher that will turn 30 next year. I believe the calculus for paying 30ish starting pitchers of value is changing. I believe - regardless of Boras - shorter terms and higher average annuals will be in play. So to me, 4/120 isn't a stupid prediction. Guess we shall see. 
    • There is NOTHING preventing the Orioles of signing any player to a serious contract. Especially considering we have signed ZERO since Chris Davis way back in what 2015? That was almost a decade ago. We have been operating in a non-serious manner for too long when it comes to the org’s on field investment.  Teams that don’t spend don’t win World Series. Look at the last 20 years of the game. The Astros first World Series is the only team who wasn’t too half of the league who won a championship.
    • Some owners spend and want to win (Mets, Padres, Phillies). Some are more interested in making money (Rays, Guardians, etc). If Rubenstein is a profits based owner (has to make money year after year like JA) vs an investment style o lever (accepts some years May come with a loss or small net gain) then we (the fans) will be screwed. We will be akin to the Rays who are content with being “good”. But they are never willing to do what it takes to be good enough. I hope Rubenstein and everyone associated with the business or the Orioles paid a lot of attention to all of the empty seats for playoff games. That is evidence of a fanbase/market place who is not fully engaged.  The onus is on the Orioles to give people a compelling reason to come out and spend money especially in this economy. And it cannot just be hey look we have a winning team. The franchise must do more including investing in the on field product (in terms of committed dollars like every other serious franchise who is trying to win a championship).
    • My recollection is that MLB has rules about how much debt teams are allowed to take on and how much money owners are allowed to infuse into their franchises.   They supposedly won't approve contracts if they think a contract will cause them to exceed these thresholds.
    • Yeah like Tony T but Tony has the ability to foul pitches at will.  I want Cowser to be more like @waroriole’s Rob Refsnyder and Holliday to be Steven Kwan.  Is that too much to ask of number one picks?  But I love Cowser and most of everything he brings. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...