Jump to content

Alex Wells


Fred Manfraud

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, birdwatcher55 said:

How many 88 mph soft tossers make it? Not many I'm guessing. I don't consider him a serious prospect.

Depends what you mean by "serious prospect," I guess.    I think he has a reasonable shot at progressing to the majors and being in a major league rotation for several years.    That's good enough for me.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 269
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, birdwatcher55 said:

With an 88 mph heater? You're kidding, right?

Nope, not kidding.   See Kyle Hendricks, Josh Tomlin, Jason Vargas.    Lower velocity like that decreases your odds, but it doesn't make it impossible if you have other things going for you.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Nope, not kidding.   See Kyle Hendricks, Josh Tomlin, Jason Vargas.    Lower velocity like that decreases your odds, but it doesn't make it impossible if you have other things going for you.    

Maybe Mark Buehrle is a possible comp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, birdwatcher55 said:

With an 88 mph heater? You're kidding, right?

I was hesitant to get on board, since he doesn't have a typical profile.  I think he's a serious prospect though, remember, he's just 20 and he already has excellent command.  While he doesn't have a projectable body, some strength gain is reasonable to expect.  He's taken his change-up to the next level this year, and he has a solid curveball as well.  

He doesn't have "good stuff" but hitters see good stuff, here's how you can tell (other than the eye test).  He had the second lowest line drive allowed rate of any pitcher in the Sally league with 80+ IP (2nd out of 68).  He was also in the top 25% of IFFB rate, and the top 30% in opposite field batted balls.  These are all things that pitchers with plus fastballs generally excel at.  

Now let's talk about BB rate.  A BB rate of 4.5% is considered excellent.  Alex Wells was 1.8%, which was second best in all US based leagues.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jcarm said:

Maybe Mark Buehrle is a possible comp.

Yes, a very good one.    Mind you, I'm not saying Wells is likely to be a successful major league pitcher, much less one as successful as Buehrle.   I'm just saying an 88 mph fastball doesn't make it impossible.    Plus command of several pitches is certainly going to be necessary to overcome that disadvantage.   From what I've read, Wells has plus command of his fastball and change, can vary the speed of both those pitches, and has a curve ball that was expected to be his best pitch but didn't look as good this year.    I figure development of that pitch, and command of it, will probably dictate how far Wells can go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, phillyOs119 said:

Shane Bieber.  Aaron Civale was close behind him.  Both 2016 college draftees.

Both in the Cleveland organization, interesting.    Looks like neither of them made a BA top 20 list, either.   Command and control guys get no respect!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Both in the Cleveland organization, interesting.    Looks like neither of them made a BA top 20 list, either.   Command and control guys get no respect!

I get it that if a guy has good stuff, they are more likely to develop command/control than vice versa.  However, in my opinion (which isn't worth much) it seems like the prospect analyst community has gone too far in the valuation of "stuff" over pitchability/command.

Using guys in the Orioles organization for example, I'm not high on Ofelky Peralta or Jesus Liranzo.  They have great stuff, but in both guys I see a control/command issue that isn't easily fixable.  They have deliveries that will always make in hard to pitch consistently IMO. 

I'm fairly high on Lowther and Wells because they show plus command, not only of their below average fastballs, but also of plus secondary pitches the will miss bats (Lowther's CB and Wells' CH). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, phillyOs119 said:

I get it that if a guy has good stuff, they are more likely to develop command/control than vice versa.  However, in my opinion (which isn't worth much) it seems like the prospect analyst community has gone too far in the valuation of "stuff" over pitchability/command.

Using guys in the Orioles organization for example, I'm not high on Ofelky Peralta or Jesus Liranzo.  They have great stuff, but in both guys I see a control/command issue that isn't easily fixable.  They have deliveries that will always make in hard to pitch consistently IMO. 

I'm fairly high on Lowther and Wells because they show plus command, not only of their below average fastballs, but also of plus secondary pitches the will miss bats (Lowther's CB and Wells' CH). 

I've always liked the command/control guys.    Just a personal preference, not a "who is more likely to succeed" thing.    It's just fun to watch a guy who can't overpower batters still dominate a game by confusing them and disrupting their timing.    And, I like watching guys who don't fool around, throw strikes, get ahead and don't let batters get on base by keeping the bat on their shoulders.   

I also really enjoy it when a pitcher who used to have a blazing fastball is able to adjust after he loses it.    Mussina sat 93-95 in his prime, but averaged 86 mph in his final season, when he won 20 and posted a 3.37 ERA.   To me, that's pitching.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, phillyOs119 said:

I was hesitant to get on board, since he doesn't have a typical profile.  I think he's a serious prospect though, remember, he's just 20 and he already has excellent command.  While he doesn't have a projectable body, some strength gain is reasonable to expect.  He's taken his change-up to the next level this year, and he has a solid curveball as well.  

He doesn't have "good stuff" but hitters see good stuff, he's how you can tell (other than the eye test).  He had the second lowest line drive allowed rate of any pitcher in the Sally league with 80+ IP (2nd out of 68).  He was also in the top 25% of IFFB rate, and the top 30% in opposite field batted balls.  These are all things that pitchers with plus fastballs generally excel at.  

Now let's talk about BB rate.  A BB rate of 4.5% is considered excellent.  Alex Wells was 1.8%, which was second best in all US based leagues.   

He also had he best strike percentage in the organization for a starter so it's not like he's just getting guys out by getting them to chase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, phillyOs119 said:

I get it that if a guy has good stuff, they are more likely to develop command/control than vice versa.  However, in my opinion (which isn't worth much) it seems like the prospect analyst community has gone too far in the valuation of "stuff" over pitchability/command.

Using guys in the Orioles organization for example, I'm not high on Ofelky Peralta or Jesus Liranzo.  They have great stuff, but in both guys I see a control/command issue that isn't easily fixable.  They have deliveries that will always make in hard to pitch consistently IMO. 

I'm fairly high on Lowther and Wells because they show plus command, not only of their below average fastballs, but also of plus secondary pitches the will miss bats (Lowther's CB and Wells' CH). 

As long as Lowther and Wells continue to miss bats at great rates, I'm going to believe they are legit prospects.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • For two years we talked about 7+ run leads possibly not being Baumann proof. I probably would have DFA'd Perez first, but I don't fault them here. They needed to get rid of someone and he was one of the two least reliable options out of the pen. I guess Perez got the LHP hard thrower advantage, even though he's not good.
    • Boras has never had a guy sign a long-term extension with 2 years of service time or less. I'm sure it's something they will look long and hard at after the season. I don't expect that to change in May of this year, but I do think that if they make an offer that he turns down, people won't think they lowballed him.
    • I'd have optioned Akin too...but I'd have DFA's Cionel Perez before Baumann
    • Not saying they are one jerk but there’s always likely something that is the straw that broke the camels back and that outing yesterday may have been it.
    • I know you can go to the MLB.com site and see a highlight with commentary and all that, but I had a hunch last night for this particular AB and got lucky.  Was enjoying myself too much live to capture either of the triples for timing purposes 😆  But it was fun hearing this huge crowd erupt as it was headed back to tie things up in the bottom of the first!  
    • Agreed. My point was that the fans knew the Nats were trying.  The Orioles have not tried.  People can say that we don’t know but Gunnar was asked and said there were no talks that he had any knowledge of.  No player should be upset if the Orioles came out and said they wanted some extensions.  And the fans are going to be happy they are at least trying. Right now we have no evidence they have even tried.  This is why many, including some defending saying nothing, were upset with Angelos. 
    • It's hard to hit your way out of a slump when you are on the bench. Mullins is going to get chances, I don't believe he's completely cooked.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...