Jump to content

Congrats to Buck on becoming the 2nd-winningest manager in modern Oriole history


Frobby

Recommended Posts

This news is actually a few days old, but somehow passed without a thread on the topic. Last week, Buck passed Paul Richards to become the second-winningest manager in Orioles history. He now has 521 wins, ahead of Richards' 517.

Buck's not going to challenge Earl Weaver's 1,480 wins as Orioles manager, but he is likely to pass Earl in total managerial wins sometime next year. Buck has won 1,403 games, 28th on the all-time list. By the time this season is over, he should be up to 25th all time, passing Jimmy Dykes (1406), Al Lopez (1410), and Miller Huggins (1413). Next year he could pass Earl and Clark Griffith (1491) to finish the year in 23rd place.

As a fan who has seen at least 14 different men skipper the Orioles, I feel very lucky that Buck has been at the helm the last 5+ years. Notably, last week was the 6th anniversary of the day Buck took over the team. One of the most important days in the history of the franchise, in my humble opinion.

Congrats, Buck, and I hope you've got many years as Orioles manager in front of you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I thought the consensus was to fire Buck when the left Gallardo in too long. Or didnt drop Davis down to 6th in the order. Or put Brach in the game and should have put Britton in for 9 outs...

I am glad we have Buck as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Notably, last week was the 6th anniversary of the day Buck took over the team. One of the most important days in the history of the franchise, in my humble opinion.

Without question. I'm hoping in the next 5 years, assuming he is still here, that those 14 years will seem like a bad dream.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am so dang thankful a couple of other people pulled themselves out of contention for the job.

I think will be here until at least 2018, and beyond that, if he wants to keep at it.

I do not see him managing elsewhere, when he decides to hang it up, it will be life after baseball.

Just IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This news is actually a few days old, but somehow passed without a thread on the topic. Last week, Buck passed Paul Richards to become the second-winningest manager in Orioles history. He now has 521 wins, ahead of Richards' 517.

Buck's not going to challenge Earl Weaver's 1,480 wins as Orioles manager, but he is likely to pass Earl in total managerial wins sometime next year. Buck has won 1,403 games, 28th on the all-time list. By the time this season is over, he should be up to 25th all time, passing Jimmy Dykes (1406), Al Lopez (1410), and Miller Huggins (1413). Next year he could pass Earl and Clark Griffith (1491) to finish the year in 23rd place.

As a fan who has seen at least 14 different men skipper the Orioles, I feel very lucky that Buck has been at the helm the last 5+ years. Notably, last week was the 6th anniversary of the day Buck took over the team. One of the most important days in the history of the franchise, in my humble opinion.

Congrats, Buck, and I hope you've got many years as Orioles manager in front of you.

GO BUCK!! congrats and here's to LOTS MORE WINS! :thumbsup1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking about this the other day...does Buck make it into the HoF? Does he need the ring to get into it? He currently sits at a .521 Win % and has taken helm of 4 "bad" teams and turned them into perennial successes.

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking about this the other day...does Buck make it into the HoF? Does he need the ring to get into it? He currently sits at a .521 Win % and has taken helm of 4 "bad" teams and turned them into perennial successes.

Thoughts?

I think he would need the ring honestly. Anyhow, Buck's definitely become the best O's manager in my lifetime. (I was born after Earl's second run). We are so fortunate to have him as our manager.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he would need the ring honestly. Anyhow, Buck's definitely become the best O's manager in my lifetime. (I was born after Earl's second run). We are so fortunate to have him as our manager.

CBSSPORTS agrees with you:

(This was written last year)

A Ring And He's In

Buck Showalter, Orioles: A three-time AL Manager of the Year (1994, 2004, 2014), Showalter has a well-earned reputation for turning franchises around, which he did with the Yankees, Diamondbacks, Rangers and O's. He's won 1,259 games in his career with an impressive .520 winning percentage considering he's taken over bad teams at each stop, though he has yet to win a World Series. That's holding Showalter back more than anything. In fact, it wasn't until last year's ALDS that his team even won a postseason round (not counting the 2012 AL wild-card game). If Showalter wins a World Series at some point, I think he's a lock for Cooperstown. Hard to see a ring-less manager getting into the Hall of Fame though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Did someone say McKenna and "white hot?" Never ever thought I'd be around to read that and I like - root for McKenna. Again, I want to see more of Kjerstad before they send him down. How Hyde does it, I don't care. 
    • I’m going to miss his exchanges with Boxscore Billy.   🙂
    • We can agree to disagree.  I'd rather watch Cowser, as awful as he's been because there's upside there and he represents the future.  You know as well as I do that Hays isn't long for this team and he's at his peak or he's already hit it.   If my leftfielder is going to put up a .114/.262/.171 slash line, I at least want to know that he's on the upswing of his career.  Hays has been bad to borderline terrible for over half a season now and I don't believe he's going to get much better.  Might have a hot streak but those hot streaks are seemingly less and less these days.  More nicks and injuries and more prolonged slumps.  
    • I don't think I recall saying that, but if that's the conclusion you're jumping to....I mean, that's part of what you do, take things people say, twist them around and then take them and run.  Or play a semantics game.  So I'm assuming that's what you'll do here. But, just to be difficult, yeah, I'd rather watch McKenna.  Hays has been harder to watch going back to the 2nd half of last year.   First of all, I'm not a McKenna fan but I think he gets a lot of unwarranted flak around here.  Like, he's a perfectly fine 4th or 5th outfielder.  Yeah, he's a bit of a doofus but it's not a big deal.  It's as if people are still holding a grudge against the dropped flyball in Fenway last year and it's just absurd.   He's not great, but he's not completely awful, either. No, I don't want to watch Hays.  I'd rather see Cowser in LF, Mullins in CF and Santander/Kjerstad in RF.   And if that means McKenna gets a little bit more playing time, so be it. 
    • I already talked about 2023 and 2024.  In 2022, his OpS vs lefties was 324. Now, prior to 2022, he was very good vs lefties outside of an awful year in 2018…but when you have to go back 3 years, especially at his age, to justify a stat, that’s not a good thing.
    • That is painting in very broad brush strokes. I'm not certain I would draw the same conclusion as you have. Standard deviation is a measure of how dispersed data is rather than how one variable relates to another. I think in this case a better assessment would be a regression analysis where you are looking at the impact of one independent variable, walks or OBP on a second independent variable, runs or wins. And thats assuming a linear regression, which may not be accurate. 
    • It also applied in the Reds series, but they didn't get on base, so.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...