Jump to content

Tale of a Horrible Month of Baseball


Uli2001

Recommended Posts

From May 10 though June 11, the Orioles went 10-21 and went from 1st to 4th in the division.

It could, and probably should, have been worse: they went 4-0 in extra innings, and 7 of the 10 wins were by one or two runs.

To be fair, 10 of the 21 losses were also by one or two runs. But the overall margin of win was 2 runs, while the margin of loss was 3.52 runs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, birdwatcher55 said:

Could Buck be in trouble?

Who would replace him? DD would have to go too. There is a certain chain of command. The owner picks the GM. The GM gets the Manager he wants. Not someone that's forced on him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, MDtransplant757 said:

HEY, REMEMBER LAST SEASON WHEN THIS SPECIFIC THING HAPPNED AND WE REBOUNDED???????

Last year it was just SP.  The bullpen was great and the offense was leading the league in homers.  This year the SP is still terrible, the bullpen has been average, and the homers aren't flying out.  Davis, Trumbo, Jones, and Manny all have OPS's under .800.  It just doesn't have that same feel that we're close to putting it all together.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, birdwatcher55 said:

Could Buck be in trouble?

At this point I don't see how Buck could be in trouble, and I think it would take more than this season falling apart for him to lose his job.

What I could see happening is if things do fall apart and the front office decides to do a complete rebuild Buck may step down because I don't think he'd want to be a part of a rebuild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, billw76 said:

At this point I don't see how Buck could be in trouble, and I think it would take more than this season falling apart for him to lose his job.

What I could see happening is if things do fall apart and the front office decides to do a complete rebuild Buck may step down because I don't think he'd want to be a part of a rebuild.

I used to think that Showalter (he is a grown man with a last name) was untouchable too. But I am not so sure now. He needed to have a decent year this year with all the payroll the Orioles are putting out there, and especially after having mismanaged the WC game last year (and many other games as has been chronicled).The great thing about him, if nothing else, is that his teams have good chemistry. They don't tank. If this team plays selfish, undisciplined baseball the rest of the year like they have played for most of this past month, why would the Orioles keep him? But he will not be fired during the season for sure. That's not Angelos' MO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Uli2001 said:

I used to think that Showalter (he is a grown man with a last name) was untouchable too. But I am not so sure now. He needed to have a decent year this year with all the payroll the Orioles are putting out there, and especially after having mismanaged the WC game last year (and many other games as has been chronicled).The great thing about him, if nothing else, is that his teams have good chemistry. They don't tank. If this team plays selfish, undisciplined baseball the rest of the year like they have played for most of this past month, why would the Orioles keep him? But he will not be fired during the season for sure. That's not Angelos' MO. 

Personally I think Buck will be given the opportunity to finish out his contract. If this season completely falls apart I think we're more likely to see Buck step down with Duquette going too.The reason I think they keep him is if they decide to keep this team together and give it one more shot next season. If there is a rebuild he will definitely be gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, billw76 said:

Personally I think Buck will be given the opportunity to finish out his contract. If this season completely falls apart I think we're more likely to see Buck step down with Duquette going too.The reason I think they keep him is if they decide to keep this team together and give it one more shot next season. If there is a rebuild he will definitely be gone.

The last 5 this team has outperformed most Sabrmetric projections.   If that is not Buck, then exactly what is it?   It's a big enough sample size that I think we can rule out luck at this point.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SteveA said:

The last 5 this team has outperformed most Sabrmetric projections.   If that is not Buck, then exactly what is it?   It's a big enough sample size that I think we can rule out luck at this point.

 

I agree, I think Buck has done enough that he won't be fired regardless of how this season ends. Only way I see him leaving is if we decide to rebuild, and then I see him stepping down and not being fired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SteveA said:

The last 5 this team has outperformed most Sabrmetric projections.   If that is not Buck, then exactly what is it?   It's a big enough sample size that I think we can rule out luck at this point.

 

Those projections underestimating the quality and impact of the bullpen.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Those projections underestimating the quality and impact of the bullpen.

 

If you read the game thread, Buck is a horrible handler of pitchers.   He leaves his starters in WAY too long and doesn't use the bullpen enough, and then when he does he uses the wrong guys.   He should pitch the good ones an inning each every game.

Is it possible maybe his bullpen management, wild card game excluded, is actually part of WHY the bullpen has been so good and has impacted our record so much?   Just wondering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SteveA said:

If you read the game thread, Buck is a horrible handler of pitchers.   He leaves his starters in WAY too long and doesn't use the bullpen enough, and then when he does he uses the wrong guys.   He should pitch the good ones an inning each every game.

Is it possible maybe his bullpen management, wild card game excluded, is actually part of WHY the bullpen has been so good and has impacted our record so much?   Just wondering.

Of course it is.  Overall he does a fine job.  That being said yes I think he leaves his starters in too long which often results in his relievers coming in with men on base, which is not optimal.

I also think that he is grossly mishandling Bundy this year but that isn't something that has been an issue in past with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Javy Baez has been on 5 playoff teams including a World Series winner and an LCS team.  128 postseason plate appearances. Mark Canha has been on 5 playoff teams and has 54 postseason plate appearances. Gio Urshela has been on 4 playoff teams and in an LCS and has 88 postseason plate appearances. Those 3 guys may not be big postseason contributors right now but that doesn't mean they aren't providing some amount of leadership by example.   They did have 1000 PAs among them this year for the Tigers.
    • Of course the question asked in that article doesn't really directly answer what a lot of people are talking about. No one is saying we want to have a roster full of guys with experience. But some have suggested that have a team almost completely devoid of guys who have had postseason success, might lead to a bunch of young players who lack role models and mentors and leaders who can help them the first time they face the pressure of the postseason, which really is a totally different animal than the 162 game regular season grind. Anecdotally, there are many guys from the 1966 Orioles (which was a pretty young team) who talked about how Frank came in and "taught us how to win". Anecdotally, back in the days of the "Oriole way", players talked about coming into the organization and learning from veterans how to conduct yourself and how to play the game the right way.   It's hard to have that when you have a total gutting/rebuild of a franchise.    Anecdotally, in the book Astroball, which I read quite a few years ago but I think I remember this part, they talked about the front office coming to the realization that they needed to bring in some veteran leadership, and specifically targeting Carlos Beltran for that reason. Maybe the anecdotes are BS.   Maybe guys just make up narratives after something is successful.   But these ARE human beings, not just a sequence of stats and numbers.   It makes sense that, especially with young players who have never dealt with failure much, the pressure of the postseason could become an isssue and it might be nice to have some wise old heads to lean on. We have a core of young players who have basically been eagerly awaited by fans, told that they are the basis of the next winning franchise, and greeted with adulation.   They came into a team that had minimal veteran leadership and no postseason experience.   They are managed by a manager who has been a coach on winning teams but has never managed in the postseason before.   They have hitting coaches who were hired because of their ability to promote a hitting philosophy and modern coaching techniques that the organization believes are optimal, but who have never coached major league players before in any capacity. Our core players are trying to figure out how to be major leaguers with far less guidance than people who have been there, than perhaps any group of young players ever.   They may be getting excellent instruction and swing analysis and data that will help them hit better, but they have no one who has been through the mental and physical and emotional  tribulations of being a young player in the majors and triumphed, to serve as an example as they try to grown into superstars and champions. In previous seasons, before "liftoff", we brought in guys like Frazier and Chirinos specifically to serve as veteran role modeals, and were able to do so because all the MLB pieces weren't in place yet and there were roster spots available.   Now those spots aren't available, and if we bring in someone for veteranosity they are also going to have to be good enough to play on a championship team.   Harder to find those guys of course.   But I wouldn't dismiss the need altogether.
    • It sounds like it was bad but perhaps not as bad as they thought it would be. 
    • Oh, I'd love to have one come through our system by being drafted and developed. No doubt at all. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...