Jump to content

June 7th vs Blue Jays


baltosravns2110

Recommended Posts

Per ESPN

Roberts 2B

Jones CF

Markakis RF

Huff 3B

Millar 1B

Scott DH

Payton LF

Quiroz C

Cintron SS

Blue Jays

Stewart LF

Scutaro 2B

Rios CF

Rolen 3B

Stairs DH

Overbay 1B

Barajas C

Wilkerson RF

Eckstein SS

Come on, what a big win this could be.

Hoping jones has another good day, I would like to see him bat second more. He should get better pitches to hit with markakis behind him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Why have Jones bunting? Stupid. We gave up an out for nothing, Roberts would have scored from 2nd on that single. (And for the record I was opposed to the bunt before Markakis singled, just hadn't gotten over here to post. Even if Nick had hit a sac fly I still wouldn't be crazy about it. Burnett has struggled in the first inning, he has a 7.64 ERA at home. Why give him a free out?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why have Jones bunting? Stupid. We gave up an out for nothing, Roberts would have scored from 2nd on that single. (And for the record I was opposed to the bunt before Markakis singled, just hadn't gotten over here to post. Even if Nick had hit a sac fly I still wouldn't be crazy about it. Burnett has struggled in the first inning, he has a 7.64 ERA at home. Why give him a free out?)

This season we have had problems scoring runs with Guthrie on the mound and during day games. DT may have just wanted to get Guthrie to pitch with lead. Having Roberts on 3rd lets Nick be able to hit a grounder to the right side or a fly ball to score Roberts that otherwise would have just moved him from 2nd to 3rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We wanna get any early runs we can for Guthrie

Getting multiple runs would be better than just getting one. Bunting improved our chances of getting one but significantly decreased our chances of getting multiple runs.

Think about it, after the Millar strikeout, the announcer said "It was a promising inning but now the O's need a 2 out hit". Burnett had just gotten one batter out, but because we GAVE him a 2nd out we had gone from promising inning to 1 run.

We played for one run, and we got one run. We took the bat out of the hands of one of our hottest hitters' hands, and a guy that I think could do well vs a fastball pitcher like Burnett.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting multiple runs would be better than just getting one. Bunting improved our chances of getting one but significantly decreased our chances of getting multiple runs.

Think about it, after the Millar strikeout, the announcer said "It was a promising inning but now the O's need a 2 out hit". Burnett had just gotten one batter out, but because we GAVE him a 2nd out we had gone from promising inning to 1 run.

We played for one run, and we got one run. We took the bat out of the hands of one of our hottest hitters' hands, and a guy that I think could do well vs a fastball pitcher like Burnett.

I agree with what you're saying but I think when it comes to a situation like Guthrie where the team struggles to get 1 or 2 runs for him when he starts that you have to take what you can get when you can get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • We no longer the little sisters of the poor. I can understand us maybe not outbidding the Dodgers and maybe the Mets for a top FA. But the rest of those teams mentioned? We should be right there with any of them. Our ownership groups pockets go just as deep if not deeper.
    • Forget the value for a second since they don't add up from the chart on the right to the chart on the left. Just look at how much less he swings at pitches in the heart of the zone. He swings at 10% less pitches than the major league average in the heart of the zone where most of the damage is done. He actually swang at 3% more pitches than major league average on chase, so not sure how he was worth 22 more runs unless he did more damage than others in that area.
    • You're being obtuse.  He would have had the job for good if he had played reasonably well.  He looked completely overmatched in those first 30 AB's so they rightly sent him down.
    • I think dropping the cutter was a big development for him. He used that a fair amount (15%) through the end of his ML stint in July, but then they totally shelved it after that. Seems he replaced it primarily with more use of the sweeper, which proved to be a more effective pitch. After he came back up in August, he had a 4.25 ERA and a 3.47 FIP, which are both very solid numbers for a rookie starter. He did that against a pretty tough slate of opponents, including BOS (x2), DET (x2), LAD, HOU, and MIN.  More specifically, he had a 6.27 xFIP against RHHs up until August, and the cutter was one of his weapons against them. After coming back up (and discarding the cutter), he had a 3.82 xFIP against RHHs. That’s a game changer, and the next step is probably getting that changeup polished up to be the other weapon against righties.
    • I think green bar above the color coded line is Swing and the brown bar below the color coded line is Take. So data from each zone straddles its color coded line. So he was bad when he took pitches in the heart, and bad when he swung at them in the shadow.
    • Ward is a good option because he’s still playable against RHP’s and is decent defensively. He K’d a lot this year but he doesn’t chase much and his whiff rate is fine. Not sure if he’s available, but Lars Nootbar would be a great option. He’s LH, but he doesn’t chase, doesn’t whiff, walks a ton, is a decent fielder, and is almost as good against LHP’s as RHP’s. He would be a perfect lead off option to allow Gunnar to hit 3rd. 
    • Agree. Eflin and Grayson are likely to miss some time on the IL with something hopefully minor. Suarez is 35 and who knows. No guarantee that Bradish and Wells are options. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...