Jump to content

Believe?


twinedenter

Recommended Posts

23 hours ago, twinedenter said:

I know Duquette talks in riddles and code but on MLB, when asked directly by Smoltz about his rotation options, he said:

We will be looking for older veterans and bounce back candidates, as well as internal options to fill out the rotation.  Smoltz reminded him that the O's rotation was the WORST in baseball in 2017.

IF that's true, we would be heading for another last place finish.

 

Personally, I don't believe it, but his past certainly backs this type of "improvement".

I don't trust DD getting the type rotation the team needs to be successful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

LOL at anyone thinking Angelos is going to all of the sudden change his tune on the "pitching" we are allowed to acquire. Remember, this is a BUSINESS first and foremost. Dollars and cents. Bottom lines. No risk. No long term commitment, try to ROLL THOSE DICE and get lucky. There isn't a single shred of evidence anything will be changing in that department now, or ever. Dan is just affirming that with every interview. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TradeAngelos said:

LOL at anyone thinking Angelos is going to all of the sudden change his tune on the "pitching" we are allowed to acquire. Remember, this is a BUSINESS first and foremost. Dollars and cents. Bottom lines. No risk. No long term commitment, try to ROLL THOSE DICE and get lucky. There isn't a single shred of evidence anything will be changing in that department now, or ever. Dan is just affirming that with every interview. 

 

Although I agree with some of your points, you can't argue the fact that the O's payroll is pretty high. 

Its how the money was spent that is the big part of this issue. Duquette signed Gallardo/Ubaldo and a bunch of retreads and they have ALL been bad. Ublado got 4/50.

Players available late in the off-season are there for a reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, twinedenter said:

Although I agree with some of your points, you can't argue the fact that the O's payroll is pretty high. 

Its how the money was spent that is the big part of this issue. Duquette signed Gallardo/Ubaldo and a bunch of retreads and they have ALL been bad. Ublado got 4/50.

Players available late in the off-season are there for a reason.

Like Nelson Cruz?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Frobby said:

Like Nelson Cruz?

While you have brought out a legit example, you have to admit no one wanted to touch Cruz. He was a very rare exception. 

I do not believe the O's got Ubaldo/Gallardo/Trumbo for less than would have, if they would have signed them earlier in the off-season. They got what they were gonna get.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this is how things are gonna go, (basement bin hunting) you can be sure Buck and Manny are not coming back. Probably not Britton either, since he'd probably rather pitch on a contender, all things equal. Jones would possibly return if the team still has room for corner OF's, but they have so many in the minors right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, twinedenter said:

While you have brought out a legit example, you have to admit no one wanted to touch Cruz. He was a very rare exception. 

I do not believe the O's got Ubaldo/Gallardo/Trumbo for less than would have, if they would have signed them earlier in the off-season. They got what they were gonna get.

 

Trumbo was acquired early in the offseason for Steve Clevenger.  The Gallardo and Ubaldo arguments are apt, however. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without predicting any big additions, I can see this team being somewhat  competitive IF they get lucky and their bats actually show up next year. Big years from Manny, Schoop, Davis, Jones, Trumbo could carry us. Maybe some of the young guys take a leap forward. But based on what we've seen recently and the potential for injuries, it's hard to bet on it. There's been a lot of complaining about the front office and their questionable moves (when they actually make them), but we should all be used to it by now. Yeah, it's not ideal, but I don't see any reason to expect anything different. All I can really do is hope for a perfect storm with the guys we've got and believe we've got a chance to make some noise albeit a small one.  

afRJnc.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • No one is trading anything close to that for Crochet. But I agree..spend money, not prospects.
    • That's some high standards.  Sinker ball types are always going to have higher FIPs and lower K rates.  The truth is, Quintana is probably out of our price range.  That price range is probably no more than the standard Lyles/Gibson/Kimbrel/Frazier price range until otherwise seen.   Back to Quintana, I think he's the type of guy that if healthy could be a real weapon for us with our home ballpark and a home playoff game if we ever get deep into a series.  
    • That's really the role/opening for next year that we need.  A RHH OF that could play some CF preferably.  Although, I'd lean more to and offensive minded portion of that versus the ability to play CF.  LF is big though at home. I think it's a role that Elias fills through trade, waivers, or maybe even a competition of milb deal types.  Like a RH Sam Hilliard type.  
    • Yeah, he would be good in the Austin Slater role if he was willing to accept it. Not sure that he would be quite as good defensively in CF, given that he has played fewer than 100 innings total in CF since 2021. I highly doubt that he is ready to accept a role as a platoon player though, given that he is not yet 30, and he was an above average starter by rWAR from 2021-23. I doubt he is tendered a contract, given his $6M 2024 salary. His best bet is probably to sign a one year deal with a team that doesn't hope to compete, to attempt to reestablish himself as an everyday player, while the team that signs him can hope to flip him at the trade deadline.
    • I agree. He’d be a great regular season fit in Cinncy’s ballpark. Maybe that confidence of knowing he can hit the ball out to LF at home covers up his other decencies.  As for Crochet… can’t we just resign Burnes?  Crochet would probably cost Holliday, Basallo, and Mayo. Didn’t the deadline teach us the cost of pitching? I’m for trading Mountcastle. I’d hope we can surround the young hitters with a Burnes led staff with adding a vet bat to the DH/1B mix. Other than that, I think we will roll with what we have. And we should. 
    • Hays will want to start somewhere. He shouldn't start for us. We don't want him sitting on the bench looking dejected while Kjerstad and Cowser are mashing bombs onto Eutaw Street.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...