Jump to content

40-man roster spots needed


fearthenoodle

Recommended Posts

O's will need 40-man roster spots for Gentry, Alvarez, Rasmus and Valencia. Who gets the ax? Possibilities:

Stefan Crichton

Michael Kelly

Alec Asher

Engelb Vielma

Jesus Liranzo

Jimmy Yacabonis

Chris Lee

Joey Rickard

 

I think all the names come off this list, and probably at least 3 will be pitchers. Crichton and Kelly are definites in my opinion. I think Asher is a good bet as a non-prospect, nondescript RHP.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Here is my guess.

The O's will DFA the players that are most likely to pass through waivers and can be outrighted to the Tides.   Crichton, Kelly and Vielma.  Lee recalled to the Orioles and played on the 60 day DL.

Not a bad guess. I'm going to go with Asher over Lee although that's a plausible scenario. I imagine some or all of those guys are already on waivers trying to pass them through before Thursday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guesses on this list:

Stefan Crichton - GONE

Michael Kelly - GONE

Alec Asher - GONE

Engelb Vielma - Safe for now, this team loves its middle infield depth

Jesus Liranzo - Still young

Jimmy Yacabonis - I think they follow through on starter experiment at least for a couple months.

Chris Lee - Transferred to 60-day DL

Joey Rickard - Safe for now. He's the primary back up in case of OF injuries for the time being. I can see him getting DFAed later in the year after Mullins and Hays are deemed ready. Still, think he's safe as a Gentry replacement for now (as they don't want Hays or Mullins up until they can play mostly everyday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jamalshw said:

 

Joey Rickard - Safe for now. He's the primary back up in case of OF injuries for the time being. I can see him getting DFAed later in the year after Mullins and Hays are deemed ready. Still, think he's safe as a Gentry replacement for now (as they don't want Hays or Mullins up until they can play mostly everyday.

Once the roster moves happen, they'll have 7 OF'ers on the 40-man , and he's clearly the 7th. Plus they'll have Presley and Brugman at Norfolk, and Stewart and Mullins knocking on the door as well.

His time might not be now, but it's probably a lot closer than we think given how much run he's been given the last couple of years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, fearthenoodle said:

Once the roster moves happen, they'll have 7 OF'ers on the 40-man , and he's clearly the 7th. Plus they'll have Presley and Brugman at Norfolk, and Stewart and Mullins knocking on the door as well.

His time might not be now, but it's probably a lot closer than we think given how much run he's been given the last couple of years.

I believe his day is today. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Joey will be DFA because someone would claim him.    He is 26 with almost 2 years of major league experience.    He was rushed to the majors through the Rule 5 draft.  He has a 382 OBP at AA and a 404 OBP at AAA.    But he has only played 42 games in AAA.   He has two options left not counting the one that was used for this season.   He has speed.  His defense has improved.

The O's need to let him play  at AAA.  He might turn into a valuable player later this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, fearthenoodle said:

O's will need 40-man roster spots for Gentry, Alvarez, Rasmus and Valencia. Who gets the ax? Possibilities:

Stefan Crichton

Michael Kelly

Alec Asher

Engelb Vielma

Jesus Liranzo

Jimmy Yacabonis

Chris Lee

Joey Rickard

 

I think all the names come off this list, and probably at least 3 will be pitchers. Crichton and Kelly are definites in my opinion. I think Asher is a good bet as a non-prospect, nondescript RHP.  

Good thread. I’d handicap this at the bottom of the 40 man. My predictions, 

DFA-Kelly

DFA-Vielma

DFA-Chricton

15 Day DL -Ynoa ( out of options, but hurt)

60 day DL - Lee ( hurt) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Gunnar’s fWAR is 4.7. It was 4.7 for all of 2023. Hes a top 3 player in the game right now.
    • Irvin, Kremer, and maybe Povich are all capable of Game 3. You’re overstating what is necessary for postseason success. It doesn’t have to be a fool proof team. This offense is capable of carrying a league average #3 SP. 
    • Here are some June numbers as of the day off: Hays 1.227 OPS Santander 1.074, 12 R, 8 HR 14 RBI Henderson 1.021, 14 R O’Hearn .906 Urias .837 Rutschman .809, 4 HR 16 RBI Westburg.765 Mountcastle .743, 10 R, 5 HR, 12 RBI Cowser .697 Stowers .588 Mullins .587 Mateo .520 Overall, the team has an .832 OPS in June and is averaging 5.56 runs per game, while allowing 2.88 runs per game.   That’ll work.
    • His sprint speed is in the 88th percentile.
    • Was he favoring his right elbow, as well?
    • I can't say what Elias will do. Because I have no way of knowing that. I have no inside knowledge. I'm just a fan like everybody else. What I can and will say is that he should be exploring every way to meaningful upgrade the roster where it is weakest, which is the pitching staff. I understand not wanting to trade Holliday (and he should not IMO). Holliday's value, while still very high, is probably not as high it was before the season started. But as far as the other two are concerned. An argument can be made that they are redundant pieces. One of them can be made expendable through a Santander (very affordable) extension.  Now, what I will say, is that I don't think that it is the best strategy long term to hoard position player prospects (especially those who are redundant no matter how talented) at the sake of not having comparable talent on the pitching side. That has us with a prime aged Kjerstad wasting a season at AAA (while destroying the baseball) because there is literally no place to play him. I see it as taking on unnecessary risks to replace Santander and/or O'Hearn/Mountcastle when they are affordable and productive Major League players. Yes it is possible all of our prospects out hit/out produce them. But it is also possible that all do not. Replacing them all may lead to an unforced error in betting on the future. IMO it doesn't have to be a binary choice of either/or with productive vets vs uber talented young prospects. We can have our cake and eat it to by taking a both/and approach. We will still have TWO uber talented prospects next year in Holliday and one of Mayo/Basallo while having Santander (extended) AND O'Hearn (on a team option at a very affordable contract) AND a difference making pitcher (to help soften the blow/loss of Bradish). Yes this requires a little spending (which I acknowledge some posters hate the idea of that). But again it comes down to expectations and the bar that the org sets. If we want to be the next Astros (multi-World Series winners) it's not going to solely be about our front office and scouting talent, and trying to always be the smartest guys in the room. Sometimes the ownership has to do their part and invest in the known quotient/reliable talent that can keep your odds as high as possible because you can go toe-to-toe/bullet-for-bullet with anyone. 
    • Do players really have that much control of direction? I definitely think there's a major variance factor in that. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...