Jump to content

Is Sisco Toast?


Aristotelian

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Lol, the argument is now that Sisco is toast, but we should have expected him to be toast. Okay, I can agree with that, as long as we acknowledge that he is, in fact, toast.

I don’t acknowledge that he’s toast, or that he “should be” toast.    I was just pointing out that most second round picks don’t become everyday players, so we shouldn’t have “expected” Sisco to be one when he was drafted.    I still have hopes that Sisco will develop into a solid contributor.    I acknowledge that he isn’t one right now, and there are danger signs that he may never become one.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I don’t acknowledge that he’s toast, or that he “should be” toast.    I was just pointing out that most second round picks don’t become everyday players, so we shouldn’t have “expected” Sisco to be one when he was drafted.    I still have hopes that Sisco will develop into a solid contributor.    I acknowledge that he isn’t one right now, and there are danger signs that he may never become one.    

I am where you are.  I gave up on players before like Arrrieta and Satander.  Both of whom looked like lost causes.  He has had plenty of success in the minors and still is young.  Perhaps he can come around.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I don’t acknowledge that he’s toast, or that he “should be” toast.    I was just pointing out that most second round picks don’t become everyday players, so we shouldn’t have “expected” Sisco to be one when he was drafted.    I still have hopes that Sisco will develop into a solid contributor.    I acknowledge that he isn’t one right now, and there are danger signs that he may never become one.    

My oblique reference to John Bale was because he was traded for Jayson Werth.  O's first round pick in '97, was a top 50 prospect in all of baseball in 2000.  The O's traded him for that mediocre LOOGY because his power was never going to develop and he wasn't a very good defensive catcher.  His power developed about 15 minutes later.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, wildbillhiccup said:

To stick with the analogy, Sisco is like that piece of toast that you leave in the toaster too long and end up having to scrape off the burnt parts to try and salvage it. It's up to the coaching staff to scrape off his flaws. Hopefully there's still a hitter left when the finish. 

I still think Sisco has a career in baseball, but not as catcher. Orioles should give him every last chance when they are currently trying Wilkerson out as a CF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, VaBird1 said:

Perhaps, but he and Severino are tied for sixth best hitting performance on the team this year.  96 OPS+ is above average for a catcher.

Yeah, 96 OPS+ this season for both of them.  Sisco has the better career OPS+ and far better minor league numbers, so I'd expect more offensive improvement from him going forward.  Both improved offensively this year and got valuable experience catching, so I think both made strides - I'd call it a useful season for both and for the O's in regards to both.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, accinfo said:

I was wondering if now that a 3rd catcher is up would Sisco get a start at 3rd base or any other position during September.

No.  I just don't see them giving him his very first experience at another position at the ML level.  Even Manny got reps at 3B down in Bowie before his promotion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

No.  I just don't see them giving him his very first experience at another position at the ML level.  Even Manny got reps at 3B down in Bowie before his promotion.

Manny is so atheletic, I think he could probably play any position on the diamond, including catcher,.

Mancini got his first COF at the ML, and for me, common sense, says you do this in the minors, but, heck what do I know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I would be OK with this and it’s what Hyde was doing with Kimbrel in a way too. We’ve got guys that can match up, let’s try to take advantage. 
    • A 90 win season with Grayson missing at least 10 starts, Means and Bradish missing at least 20 each.  Throw in Tyler Wells missing most of the season and other injuries I think this team and its management has done well.  If just a little more healthy they could have had back to back 100 win seasons.  I am glad we have Mike Elias and Brandon Hyde leading this team.  
    • Some interesting things of note from https://www.samford.edu/sports-analytics/fans/2023/Sabermetrics-101-Understanding-the-Calculation-of-WAR. I pulled out the relevant areas: Fangraphs allocates 570 WAR for position players and 430 WAR for pitchers, while Baseball-Reference allocates 590 WAR for position players and 410 WAR for pitchers The major difference between fWAR and bWAR comes from the measurement of fielding runs, which is the defensive output a player provides. Fangraphs uses a statistic called Ultimate Zone Rating (UZR), while Baseball-Reference uses a statistics called Defensive Runs Saved (DRS). The differences in these stats can lead to drastically different calculations in WAR for some position players. UZR takes into account 3 years of players’ data as well as MLB data to determine these percentages, whereas DRS uses essentially 1 year of data. Therefore, some rookies will have drastically different UZR and DRS stats. As opposed to positional players, Fangraphs and Baseball-Reference take drastically different steps in calculating the WAR of pitchers. It does not follow the formula for position players but does try to calculate the “wins” that a pitcher gives to their team. Instead, they use a “base” statistic to help calculate WAR. Fangraphs uses FIP, or fielding independent pitching, as its base for calculating pitchers' WAR, whereas Baseball-Reference focuses on Runs Allowed per 9 innings (RA9) for its base I think the main takeaway for Gil, bWAR likes him more than FanGraphs probably because FG aims to take the defensive element out of the calculation by centering on FIP. And if we look at FIP, his is close to 4. But Baseball Reference is using RA9 which does have a defensive element inherently calculated. As for Cowser, I reckon FG likes him more than BBRef particularly on the defensive metric side of things. Maybe BBRef is harsher on the DRS side than FG is on the UZR side. To me, I like FG for pitchers far more than BBRef. For position players, I’d give the nod to FG but mainly because I think DRS can have some wide swings where UZR has a tendency to be more centered.
    • Win game 1, Kremer/Suarez game 2, win game 2, Eflin game 1 ALDS? Win game 1, Kremer/Suraez game 2, lose game 2, Eflin game 3? Lose game 1, Eflin game 2?
    • The win tonight in game 161 allowed the 2023-24 Orioles to reach 191 wins, tied with the 1964-65 and 1965-66 teams for the 7th most wins in consecutive seasons.  With a win tomorrow, they could move up to a tie for 5th. Tonight’s win also gave the O’s 275 wins over the last 3 seasons, tied for 11th with the 1975-77 and 1976-78 O’s.  They could move into a tie for 10th with a win tomorrow.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...