Jump to content

Where would we be without John Means?


Bubble Buddy

Recommended Posts

I know it's not this simple, but without Means, do we even eclipse last year's dismal record? We certainly didn't expect this type of production from him before the season. Perhaps Cashner isn't traded if Bundy was going to be the only one left that could make it through 5 innings.

I know our W/L is still terrible, but this guy has provided a lot of stability. Every time I check my MLB app and see that he's starting, I've come to expect that it will be a different type of game than the other 4.

What a great season. Cheers to you Mr. Means! ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply
3 minutes ago, panick said:

Without Means the O's would have a much better chance at the top draft pick next year.

With a team that appears to need a couple of years to be good enough for a .500 record, I'd rather have the higher draft picks.

 

Means is not a free agent until 2025. I would MUCH rather have a controlled MLB #2-3 +4 WAR starting pitcher plus the #2 or #3 pick than the #1 pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, waroriole said:

If anyone tries to put him in a MASN commercial this winter, their head should be on a pike outside the warehouse. 

Yes, let's put him in a commercial for a tv station you're already watching and will continue to watch because your favorite team is broadcast on it. 

What a bunch of maroons.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, panick said:

Without Means the O's would have a much better chance at the top draft pick next year.

With a team that appears to need a couple of years to be good enough for a .500 record, I'd rather have the higher draft picks.

 

Well that’s stupid. He’s a lot more valuable than the difference between 1 & 2. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who is up to trade Rutschman for Witt and Brad Keller?

I will volunteer that in this desert of an 18-month stretch from the immediate implosion of Buck's last group to now, having 1-1 was probably the most enjoyable part of the bridge to next year's team when we can finally start to see more of our best stuff.  I am rooting for the Tigers daily now - Victor Reyes and Christin Stewart are charging them a little bit.

If some other team had 1-1 locked up, I wouldn't care much about the 2/3, 3/4, 4/5 difference, etc.  But talent being a bell curve, 1/2 is one I'm a little invested in.  That said - if there were a Strasburg or Harper out there, they'd be known by now, so 2020 may be a year the 1/2 delta resembles 2/3, 3/4 a bit more closely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Enjoy Terror said:

I don’t think that’s as lopsided as you think it is.

It isn't the right fit for us now, and I wouldn't do it, but I wasn't implying it'd be extremely lopsided.  I'd just like to have a valid franchise player in 2 years, not 4, plus the Supporting Cast coalescing in our upper minors needs a cornerstone by then.

Regarding guys like Means and Keller, the burden of proof that they're good stays on them more than one season.  I'm thrilled with what we've seen this year of course, but he still isn't a Top 3 starter in the good 2022 team of my imagining.  Next year awaits the Ballard Horizon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • None of them. Not a single one was good. And none were particularly good before they got here. IMO, it was not the right/proper approach to make a bunch of moves around the margins for this team (or even last year's team to be "honest"). We had real holes and needed real players that were actually good (i.e. like Tony's orginal example Erceg). Based on his last few seasons, it wasn't hard to predict that Kimbrel wouldn't be effective through the course of an entire season and into the post season. It wasn't hard to predict regression of Cano based on how his the last 3/4 months of his 23' went (adding that to that fact that he is a contact pitcher pitching in high levarage situations). It wasn't hard to predict that 22' was an outlier season for Perez and that largerly he is a mediocre reliever. And so on ... Obviously, there is no one single pitcher that can replace a Bautista (maybe Miller?). But Elias was very ineffective in building an effective bullpen for 2024. That's honest.
    • Wow! I guess it just seems that way. 
    • Gunnar and Mullins at 1-2 in some order and Westburg batting cleanup? AS at 3, OHearn at 5, Cowser 6 and Adley 7?
    • That team was              2024 7th RS                           2nd 9 BA                              3 5 K’s                             8 2 SLG                          1 101 OPS+                    118   Imagine that team playing in this park now? I know how bad they looked yesterday. Not denying that. 
    • We literally do not have any elite relievers. I trust Eflin more than anyone we have in the pen as long as he isn't struggling.
    • He is having a down second half so maybe 1/6th of his career. I do think this makes him harder to extend now. He will likely want to play better to get the best contract, but the closer he gets to free agency and if he bounces back, the number rises quickly.  For me the issue with Adley is on offense and a future in which he needs to DH or play first. Just not enough offensive capability at this point to justify that contract. I do love Adley and I also think he is hurt.
    • I feel like this lineup compares to 2016 in the sense that it's a home run or nothing. Otherwise, yes it's a different organization and we have a chance to be a playoff team for the better part of a decade. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...