Jump to content

MiLB contraction


weams

Recommended Posts

I just read both letters. Man that's nasty as hell on both sides. Really strong, flat out language. If it was between MLB and the MLBPA I'd say there's definitely going to be a strike or a lockout. In MiLB's case that's not an option. Not sure what their move is to make...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I find interesting and backs up what I have been saying for a long time.  The league says most baseball players drafted don’t make the major leagues and most players drafted after high school or after their junior year in college never get a degree.  
 

Sounds like MLB doesn’t want players to play in the year they are drafted and have less high school players drafted by eliminating short season leagues.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it possible for MLB to just let each individual franchise decide how many minor league teams it needs in its system instead of having a blanket policy?  I can see MLB having minimum standards for playing field conditions, after that, does it matter if one franchise wants 6 minor league teams and another only wants 4? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This pay the milb’rs was pretty dumb. It doesn’t hurt the parent clubs or the high bonus picks. It hurts the players drafted in rounds 11-50, the employees of the milb teams, the fanbases, the team scouts/personnel that work with the extra players, and the tax payers in these localities that built these milb stadiums, 

This played right into MLB organization’s hands.  They get to eliminate so much but yet go with a quality over quantity approach. Now there will be less job opportunities for people in all facets. Less player jobs, less team employee jobs, less coaching jobs, etc....

Why stop at the milb level? Why not demand that the coaching staffs in the NCAA, JUCO, and even in HS get paid min wage for all the hours they work?  

Edited by sportsfan8703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thinking from a purely economic standpoint, and even taking into account that billionaire owners “can afford to pay a living wage”, there’s not any strong reason to pay organizational filler to play baseball. Companies everywhere are trying to be lean by eliminating redundancies. I don’t see why baseball owners are held to another standard to increase wages while not downsizing staff. The MiLB is FAT with “unproductive employees”, as it were. 
 

That said, the congressional approval providing MLB a monopoly status should also be play here. If the MLB isn’t going to pony up and pay people, then they can’t be the only game in town either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

This pay the milb’rs was pretty dumb. It doesn’t hurt the parent clubs or the high bonus picks. It hurts the players drafted in rounds 11-50, the employees of the milb teams, the fanbases, the team scouts/personnel that work with the extra players, and the tax payers in these localities that built these milb stadiums, 

This played right into MLB organization’s hands.  They get to eliminate so much but yet go with a quality over quantity approach. Now there will be less job opportunities for people in all facets. Less player jobs, less team employee jobs, less coaching jobs, etc....

Why stop at the milb level? Why not demand that the coaching staffs in the NCAA, JUCO, and even in HS get paid min wage for all the hours they work?  

It might actually help players drafted in later rounds.  A lot of these guys are getting $10k signing bonuses or less and don't finish college.  They get a meager salary that isn't enough to feed them properly.  Then they are cut off after a few years and they go on with their lives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Chromehill said:

Is it possible for MLB to just let each individual franchise decide how many minor league teams it needs in its system instead of having a blanket policy?  I can see MLB having minimum standards for playing field conditions, after that, does it matter if one franchise wants 6 minor league teams and another only wants 4? 

That used to be the case.  In 1948 the Dodgers had 26 (six above class B, which is roughly A ball today) affiliates while the Senators had 11 (and only one of those above class B ball).  In 1935 the Browns had two and the Cardinals 13.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, atomic said:

It might actually help players drafted in later rounds.  A lot of these guys are getting $10k signing bonuses or less and don't finish college.  They get a meager salary that isn't enough to feed them properly.  Then they are cut off after a few years and they go on with their lives.

So they'd be "helped" by being cut off, they never play pro ball, and are forced to get on with their lives a few years earlier?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

So they'd be "helped" by being cut off, they never play pro ball, and are forced to get on with their lives a few years earlier?

Realism v. romanticism--no starving ball players,  no starving artists, no starving writers, no place in the world for dreams.  Either you are ready at 18-21 to amaze the world or you should go drive a truck.  Only the elite get a chance to prove they belong in the superelite.

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Pheasants said:

Realism v. romanticism--no starving ball players,  no starving artists, no starving writers, no place in the world for dreams.  Either you are ready at 18-21 to amaze the world or you should go drive a truck.  Only the elite get a chance to prove they belong in the superelite.

Let’s get a grip. You could say that now about the fact that the Orioles only have eight teams. Are you moping because the O’s don’t have 16 teams and lamenting the fates of all the poor players they aren’t hiring because of it? Of course not. If the Orioles reduced to five teams you wouldn’t be weeping for the 75 “potential players” without jobs from three contracted teams anymore than you are now in my hypothetical 16 team scenario. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Pheasants said:

Realism v. romanticism--no starving ball players,  no starving artists, no starving writers, no place in the world for dreams.  Either you are ready at 18-21 to amaze the world or you should go drive a truck.  Only the elite get a chance to prove they belong in the superelite.

No matter how many teams you have thousands of players won’t have a chance to play after college.  Tons more don’t even make their high school team.  It is just a reality that teams draft player they never see making it to even AA to fill out rosters.  Given the players a token $3k signing bonus while other players are given millions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yea.  I feel the same way.  I really do not care strongly one way or another.  Sure, I think it's kind of ugly.  I also think HR's came pretty cheap before.  I like the exciting defensive plays it fosters and of course the random triple & odd carom make for some fun and unique moments.  But I don't think it helps or hurts the team in any substantial way short of helping out the pitching a little.   I sure don't think the players are changing their approaches.  If they keep it as is, that's fine with me.  If they modify it some way, that's fine with me as well.  It does seem like there is some opportunity for some unique seats down there by modifying it slightly.  When I first saw it, it almost appeared like a construction Phase 1.  That might be reasoning for pushing it back so far, allows them some flexibility in the future.   I also don't buy that a Free Agent RH hitter is going to care at all about the wall.   They are getting paid regardless.  I'd think that 1-maximizing payday 2-playing for a winner 3-finding a location that suits your family would be your priorities and your long-term stat line would be very close to the bottom of your list of concerns.  
    • His "ability to play RF" carries about $0 value
    • Yeah but if you think most of this money is going to upgrade things that are wrong or need improving, such as the ones @accinfo lists, I think you'll be disappointed.   They will be for new features, each one designed to create revenue via premium seating or premium "experience" areas or attractions that bring non baseball fans to the park to spend or sports betting related things. I'm not saying they won't fix some basic things that need it like upgrading the sound system or improving the point of sale technology.   I'm sure they will.   But the focus is going to be on the new attractions which are all designed with revenue enhancement in mind.
    • I’m not a lawyer … perhaps @Frobbymight know. Loss of income, future revenues? Damage to their franchise….Even with MASN the Orioles lost a ton on annual tv revenues
    • Congrats to the offense on playing a heck of a game. Lamar was incredible to watch, especially the play when the snap ended up on the ground and he had to run away towards the sideline and still found Likely for the score. It's very frustrating to me that the offense HAD to play so well because of the poor coaching and abysmal defensive play.  It's odd to me that Harbaugh still messes up timeout usage after being a coach in the league for over 15 years.
    • Can someone in 150 words or less explain to me what DYAR is?
    • I have a 3 hour round trip to get to games. I can't speak about other directions, but the stadium is very easy to get to from the south...some more traffic with the earlier start times, but overall - games are VERY easy to get to, imo. You don't have the hike through the city to get to games. I'm a rural guy, and it's really not a big deal. We took the light rail from Cromwell for Game 1 (I usually park in BC or FGH) and it was a breeze. We walked out right after the game, and we immediately caught a direct bus that took us back to Cromwell directly. We did the same thing last year. I gotta be honest - I think the "they've been horrible for half the season" reasoning is pretty lame. Even when they were down (and dealing with significant injuries) after the AS break, they were still essentially a lock to make the playoffs. Then they get healthy-ish with some key guys back riiiiight before the playoffs and look great for a couple of series - but I guess it was too late for everyone?  Come on.  Just say you didn't feel like it. But don't blame August play for not showing up in October.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...