Jump to content

Roster moves in the next two days


wildcard

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Good thread,

I don’t see Fenter getting selected. He had a good bounce back season and all, but only 94 IP I low A ball. (Insert “but 26 man roster”)

Mckenna is 50/50 for me. I’d probably lean to protect him since we’re really thin at CF depth in the organization. Plus, we do have some pitchers on the 40 man, like the ones you mentioned, that could be DFA’d with little news. 

Fenter could be an MLB openers for two innings. At least someone could try that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.milb.com/milb/news/toolshed-40-man-protection-preview/c-311901856

MILB with a few paragraphs on all 30 teams....their guesses on our four close calls is:

39th man - McKenna

Bubble - Fenter v. Sedlock (~Pedigree or Performance)

Last 1 out: Cumberland

As OHIO is my Villar search zone, here's one snippet that caught my eye:

Cleveland Indians (38)

2. Triston McKenzie
14. Luis Oviedo
16. Daniel Johnson
17. Scott Moss

Outlook: This could be tight, so perhaps expect some moves from the Indians if they want to clear out 40-man space.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Enjoy Terror said:

Why would anyone need to be DFAd in that scenario with five open roster spaces?

 You have to leave room for your own rule five pick, and we want to protect as many guys as we can. My own question is actually the opposite of yours, which is, why worry about roster spots? Just designate guys, we don’t have anybody who’s especially valuable, and with the flurry of roster moves that is about to occur throughout the league, anybody we designate is almost certainly going to end up remaining with us anyway.

The most vulnerable guys probably are our outfielders, because we have so many of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't hate him, I just don't think he's a major league pitcher.

Well, you are clearly wrong, since he has pitched in the major leagues, and thus by definition is a major league pitcher.    He will always be able to say that.   Not only that, but someone once paid him $4.2 mm to sign a contract.   
 

Now, will he ever be any good?   That’s an entirely different kettle of fish.   But I’ll give him another year to prove it one way or the other.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Well, you are clearly wrong, since he has pitched in the major leagues, and thus by definition is a major league pitcher.    He will always be able to say that.   Not only that, but someone once paid him $4.2 mm to sign a contract.   
 

Now, will he ever be any good?   That’s an entirely different kettle of fish.   But I’ll give him another year to prove it one way or the other.    

Pretty sure you know I wasn't being literal.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO Wilkerson is the likely left fielder to beginning the season until Mountcastle is promoted.  Mancini likely at 1B.     Stewart probably not ready to start the season.   Hays and Santander at the other two OF positions.

Wilkerson had a  783 OPS vs righties in 2019.  If the O's have enough 26 man roster room for someone to platoon with Wilkerson  that might work well.

 

Alberto hit well against lefties but not righties in 2019.  During the first month I think Alberto gets the opportunity play vs righties and  lefties.   By the second month he may be platooning if he does not improve vs righties.  If Villar is traded maybe with Wilkerson.   Wilkerson came through the O's minor leagues mostly as  a 2B.  2B is probably his best defensive position.

I am not in favor of DFAing Wilkerson.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 40 man is at 35 right now. I expect Hanhold, Valaika, Wilkerson, Wynns, Smith Jr, Armstrong, and Kline would all pass through waivers, so there isn't any worry about the roster being full.

I'm in favor of protecting Mountcastle, Akin, Sedlock, McKenna, Kremer, and Fenter and I expect they'll claim 1 or 2 guys that shake loose from other teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • This is accurate based on pockets.  But the Yankees have positive Cash Flow even with the huge payroll, because they are the richest franchise in the MLB.  The fact that the owner can fund higher salaries is certainly important, but it isn't the same thing as team revenue.
    • These two paragraphs are not congruent.  I disagree that the Orioles have to resign Burnes.  I think they should be in on him, but they don't have to sign him. I completely agree that if they do not sign him the have to have another TOR.  I think counting on Bradish to return is a poor decision.  You hope so, but planning on it would be weak.  Same with assuming #2 status for Rodriquez.  His case is stronger of course, but still.  We have some depth IF we have a TOR and that should be Burnes or someone comparable.  
    • There are several. Snell, Pivetta, Bieber (depending on structure of the contract), Nick Martinez (swing type guy) and Heaney.  May be others. This is off the top of my head.
    • I think this is correct but I would say it differently.  I think Elias has done a great job constructing the organization and making it one of the top teams, complete teams, in baseball.  That was a huge hurdle from where he started and that has been a major success. Getting from a top MLB team to a successful playoff team may seem like a small jump but it is pretty large.  And Elias has been tentative at best at trying to make those changes.  He has taken an incremental path in hopes of maximizing his long term potential.  So far that really hasn't had much success.   But like Elias, we really should not assume that the changes needed to make that seemingly small jump from AL East contender to WS contender will not require some pretty big things.  I don't know if that is really different than what you are saying.  
    • It was never in hindsight. The Os were always against it. We had the numbers. We knew how bad it was going to effect the team.   That is why the MaSN deal was structured the way it was. It benefited the Os for a reason. That was essentially the compromise to having the team move to DC.
    • The Mets just had more exciting wins in one week than we had in four months.  I called us the Dull Orange Machine a few weeks ago for a reason.  Really boring team most of the season, with no personality at all.  They seemed to have a "get knocked down, stay down" mentality, which isn't fun to support as a fan.  There are a lot of very good reasons noted here as to why attendance wasn't great, but the energy around this team and the organization is just low and that can't help.  And a slow and boring offseason that doesn't move the needle much won't help attendance heading into next season either.  
    • This.  I grew up in Northern VA and it always took 1 hour to drive to Memorial or Camden no matter the time of day.  It was always easy to find parking as well.  Now that same drive takes 2-3 hours, and finding good parking is a pain.  Plus, the cost of parking, tickets, food/drinks, souvenirs has skyrocketed.  So the choice is to sit in traffic, fight for parking, pay tons of money for the hassle...or sit on my comfortable couch and watch the game on a huge HD screen for free...
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...