Jump to content

Rule 5: Brandon Bailey - RHP -Astros


baltfan

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Philip said:

I understand it but I’m a very visual person and I want to make sure I can visualize the effect properly. I was complimenting Luke. Don’t make it something unintended.

Easy now. I was just joking with you. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, 7Mo said:

I was just poking fun at Phillip but I'd be happy to hear your explanation.

So picture a baseball that has bullet spin, and just goes straight in the direction it’s thrown, not affected by gravity. 

If you compare that pitch with a pitch that has perfect backspin, at a 12 o’clock angle, it will arrive directly above the first pitch, the amount of rise will be dependent on the rate which it spins. The more spin the more rise. 

Now in real life, all pitches are affected by gravity so instead of rise, it just falls less. Also most 4S fastballs don’t have perfect backspin, they usually spin at a 12:30 to 2:30 o’clock angle for RHP if you are watching from behind the mound. Which imparts both rise and armside movement.

 

  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

So picture a baseball that has bullet spin, and just goes straight in the direction it’s thrown, not affected by gravity. 

If you compare that pitch with a pitch that has perfect backspin, at a 12 o’clock angle, it will arrive directly above the first pitch, the amount of rise will be dependent on the rate which it spins. The more spin the more rise. 

Now in real life, all pitches are affected by gravity so instead of rise, it just falls less. Also most 4S fastballs don’t have perfect backspin, they usually spin at a 12:30 to 2:30 o’clock angle for RHP if you are watching from behind the mound. Which imparts both rise and armside movement.

 

There's an article on the Athletic by Jake Kaplan talking at length about Brandon Bailey and the Astros developmental program.

To mirror what you're saying, from that article, 2 recent college draftees are playing catch the first day after being drafted by the Astros and their throws are tailing here and there, "sloppy" in their words. But with the Astros teaching backspin, within weeks, the side spin is gone and the "carry" or "hop" is there, straight and true.

I haven't had the opportunity to scout like you have nor do I have the depth of experience. But I've caught guys with that backspin where you watch the arm, you think you recognize the speed, and then it jumps on you. 

Thanks for the explanation.

And during the time I was typing this, the link to the article is posted above.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

So picture a baseball that has bullet spin, and just goes straight in the direction it’s thrown, not affected by gravity. 

If you compare that pitch with a pitch that has perfect backspin, at a 12 o’clock angle, it will arrive directly above the first pitch, the amount of rise will be dependent on the rate which it spins. The more spin the more rise. 

Now in real life, all pitches are affected by gravity so instead of rise, it just falls less. Also most 4S fastballs don’t have perfect backspin, they usually spin at a 12:30 to 2:30 o’clock angle for RHP if you are watching from behind the mound. Which imparts both rise and armside movement.

 

The physics has been known for a long time that there is no such thing as a "rising fastball." Oh, yes, it can look like it is rising... Wish I could find out the Bauer Units of a young Cakes fastball. 

Question: Do you think that a 90+ pitcher can actually make a damaged ball rise? Maybe make a cut in the ball's leather with a belt buckle or other sharp object near a seam and throw a fastball @ 3:00 o'clock to effect measurable, true rise on its way from the mound to the plate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Beef Supreme said:

The physics has been known for a long time that there is no such thing as a "rising fastball." Oh, yes, it can look like it is rising... Wish I could find out the Bauer Units of a young Cakes fastball. 

Question: Do you think that a 90+ pitcher can actually make a damaged ball rise? Maybe make a cut in the ball's leather with a belt buckle or other sharp object near a seam and throw a fastball @ 3:00 o'clock to effect measurable, true rise on its way from the mound to the plate?

ODayRiser.gif

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Beef Supreme said:

Sure doesn't sound like a hack job from Connolly, to me.

The narrative that he’s got an anti-management agenda (Angelos or Elias) is off base in my opinion.    I’ve been reading Connolly for many years.    I don’t always agree with his opinions but he takes issues case by case in my experience.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Philip said:

I understand it but I’m a very visual person and I want to make sure I can visualize the effect properly. I was complimenting Luke. Don’t make it something unintended.

Koji Uehara's fastball had a really high spin rate, if you remember that. Radar gun would say 89 but hitters reacted like it was 99.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two guys that both can go multi innings and will help the depth of the MLB staff next year. Elias has really improved the depth of pitching in the org since last June’s draft. It’s going to be noticeable from Delmarva - Baltimore, with Baltimore lagging behind, but we’re going to see some really deep milb staff’s to give us hope for the future. 

Edited by sportsfan8703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I guarantee you that if Christy could only get guys out by using his best stuff he would have.  
    • I'm going to guess that in the olden days there was a weeding out that happened before most kids played an organized baseball game. Many, many kids played baseball all day long in the summer, and many, many of them tore up their elbow or shoulder at 11 or 13 or whatever and never pitched on a high school or other team. And nobody was Drivelining anyone. Part of the philosophy of pitching was you don't throw as hard as you possibly can because it hurts and you'll ruin your arm. A few people got away with throwing near max effort, but most couldn't. And there was a very stong stigma to coming out of a game, so pitchers knew they'd be shamed and mocked if they threw until it really hurt and had to come out. In the 1910's Christy Mathewson (or a ghostwriter) wrote Pitching in a Pinch, where he explicitly said that using your best stuff except when you really needed to was stupid.  Smoltz is a guy who idiotically venerates the past, making the era where he came up into some kind of golden nirvana. But, he is right that the driving factor in injuries today is that everyone throws at 110% of rated capacity all the time. It's just a matter of time until something tears.  The problem is that there is no simple solution, since throwing at 110% is simply more effective than throwing at 90%. 90% gets you (essentially) limitless innings. But 110% makes your ERA half a run or a run lower (numbers made up for illustration). And it couldn't be more clear that when $millions and wins are on the line, essentially everyone picks the lower ERA over the more innings. An average MLB pitcher has an ERA in the mid-4s. If he backs it off to 90% so he can pitch into the 8th or 9th, he'll likely have an ERA in the mid-5s, which puts him in AAA. The difference between pacing and pitching until it breaks is often the difference between $7M a year and $70k a year.
    • Thx for the firsthand report, I’m heading to the game tonight, hoping to see Basallo behind the dish.  What were your impressions of Etzels swing/mechanics?  When I saw him in spring training prospects game, to my eye he looked more slap hitterish in the box compared to the other players.  His production is better than that so it could have just been the angle I observed from the 3rd base dugout area stands. 
    • I took a few things away from that game. Gunnar is fighting his swing and timing. Mateo swing and swing decisions are getting worse as the season progresses. Kjerstad may struggle with velocity in upper part of the zone. Seattle offense is really bad and they are wasting a good pitching staff. Grayson and Perez pitched really well.
    • What are your thoughts on protecting Brnovich and/or Held from the Rule 5 draft?
    • Of course they didn’t play badly. Seattle was shut out and they got 2 hits. Did the Os have some luck?  Sure..which basically happens in every win and in every loss, you have some bad luck. Os also had 2 CS. Maybe something happens with those guys.  OTOH, Raleigh made 2 perfect throws and one pitch was a pseudo pitch out, ie an easier pitch to throw off of. Second fastball of 17 pitches by Baumann. If it was a breaking ball, Cowser is safe. Bad luck.
    • You just but his minor league numbers are really good. Plus K rate and low BBs. I don't understand why he wasn't given a chance earlier. Seems to have been repeatedly held back at every level despite performing well. I don't get it 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...