Jump to content

Os still paying Bobby Bonilla $250,000 per season until 2023


weams

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

We will be having Chris Davis day for a while as well.  

Only 17 years to go!

We are supposed to defer $6M every year for him through 2022 (a total of $42M) which then gets paid out to him in small chunks through 2037.

Wonder how the 2020 salary gets all divided up assuming he plays for 60 days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Aglets said:

Only 17 years to go!

We are supposed to defer $6M every year for him through 2022 (a total of $42M) which then gets paid out to him in small chunks through 2037.

Wonder how the 2020 salary gets all divided up assuming he plays for 60 days.

"Small chunks".... each of which is about the sum total of what I have earned in my entire 32 year career in a tech field.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, weams said:

What a way to plan for retirement. Huzzah. Bobby Bo. Push Cal. Up those steps. 

Bonilla would have been better off if he'd taken the money up front and invested it in a relatively safe place.  But if he knew that was beyond his willpower and he would have burned through it years ago, I guess good on him for being honest.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Beef Supreme said:

Bonilla's total contract value would have been lower had he taken all the money during his career. Deferred payments increased the contract's total value.

Yea, the thing that makes Bonilla's deal notable (other than the total timeline) is the discount rate/return used to calculate the deferrals

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
    • Interesting. I had forgotten that they signed him and then got him in the pitching lab in the offseason. Since September is prior to the end of the season, I would take "two year contract" to mean September '23 is Year 1, and then '24 is Year 2.  That is a cool article. Very encouraging how closely they are following the KBO. 
    • I think most teams would want to have an MVP candidate at quarterback.   Most of the time this will mean that he is better than the guy they currently have.  That's why. My quote was not taking salary into account.  If you take his current salary into account I think you are still talking about a majority of the NFL teams that would take him right now.  If the salary is an issue you find a way to make it work.  I'm starting to come around to the idea that the salary cap is kinda fake in a way after I keep seeing teams do stuff like adding void years other trickery to get the guys they want.
    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...