Jump to content

The defense thread, 2020


Frobby

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Frobby said:

8/18, Game 23

The Jays scored the winning run when Pedro Severino couldn’t handle a one-bounce throw Chris Davis made from the seat of his pants after making a diving stop of a grounder.   It was scored an error on Davis, but to me the blame was squarely Severino’s.   I guess any bounced throw gets scored as an error on whoever threw the ball, but this was an accurate one-hopper with a true bounce, in plenty of time to get the runner, made while Davis was literally sitting on his fanny.     Charging him with an error there is criminal.


 https://www.mlb.com/gameday/blue-jays-vs-orioles/2020/08/18/631681#game_state=final,lock_state=final,game_tab=videos,game=631681

(Scroll to “Travis Shaw scores go-ahead run”)

Davis doesn't deserve that error.  Sevy has to catch that. Not even a short hop or in between hop there.  Stay low, snag it, and put that tag on him.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Frobby said:

8/18, Game 23

The Jays scored the winning run when Pedro Severino couldn’t handle a one-bounce throw Chris Davis made from the seat of his pants after making a diving stop of a grounder.   It was scored an error on Davis, but to me the blame was squarely Severino’s.   I guess any bounced throw gets scored as an error on whoever threw the ball, but this was an accurate one-hopper with a true bounce, in plenty of time to get the runner, made while Davis was literally sitting on his fanny.     Charging him with an error there is criminal.


 https://www.mlb.com/gameday/blue-jays-vs-orioles/2020/08/18/631681#game_state=final,lock_state=final,game_tab=videos,game=631681

(Scroll to “Travis Shaw scores go-ahead run”)

It's certainly not criminal to give Davis the error.  It was a nice stop by him - but that was not a hard play for an average 1st baseman - his lack of range made it look much harder than it was.  And he had plenty of time to throw - since he was in and the ball was hard hit.  He didn't have to throw it with his feet in the air.  Should Severino have caught that - Yes, but that was a bad throw by Davis.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Terrific play by Davis. Also fielded a bunt perfectly on the leadoff hitter. Davis has finally found his role: extra innings defensive 1B sub. I have to say it was a genius move by Hyde to put him in there that very nearly paid off, and should have. 

He's the new Mike Squires!  Or maybe Dave Stapleton.  A little peek into what the Majors would be like if they had rosters the size of NCAA football teams.  You could have Brian Matusz on staff just to face David Oritz.  Chris Davis to play defense 17 innings a year.  Two or three outfielders with absurd arms ad nothing else just in case the winning run is on third base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Hyde on 10th inning miscues: “To me, that was just a great play getting to the ball and he was trying to make a game-saving play. No fault for that. Just him catching the ball saved a run there. Just tried to make a great play and it kind of skipped up on Sevie when he threw it from his rear end. I give credit to CD for getting to the ball on a tough ball down the line.

https://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2020/08/santanders-two-homers-still-leave-os-short-in-8-7-loss.html

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

It's a near certainty that Diaz is a better defensive outfielder than Mountcastle.  He's always been an outfielder.  Mountcastle has always been a guy searching for a position.  But it is also very likely that Mountcastle is a better hitter.

Cedric Mullins is also an outfielder that has always been an outfielder.  Does that make him better than Mountcastle too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, CarrRun49 said:

The guy has yet to play 1 AAA game.  How is he a safer choice? 

I was referencing him being a safer choice in that context because at least he's been an outfielder for a long time and wouldn't be learning anew at the MLB level. IMO, yes, Mountcastle is ready offensively, but I think it makes sense to get him some reps in the OF if we're gonna put him there. 

Either isn't quite where we'd like them to be, but if I'm picking one over the other, I'd like to see Mountcastle have a defensive foundation and position (in theory) before throwing him out there. 

Edited by Bubble Buddy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bubble Buddy said:

I was referencing him being a safer choice in that context because at least he's been an outfielder for a long time and wouldn't be learning anew at the MLB level. IMO, yes, Mountcastle is ready offensively, but I think it makes sense to get him some reps in the OF if we're gonna put him there. 

How?  Did Wilkerson get a bunch of outfield reps?  Did Mancini?

How many games do you think a guy needs to be an upgrade over Smtih?

It's all about service time manipulation with Mountcastle, has been since last season.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bubble Buddy said:

I was referencing him being a safer choice in that context because at least he's been an outfielder for a long time and wouldn't be learning anew at the MLB level. IMO, yes, Mountcastle is ready offensively, but I think it makes sense to get him some reps in the OF if we're gonna put him there. 

What's the worst that can happen?  He fall down trying to get a ball and end up with a concussion?  No way that could happen to a guy that played a bunch of outfield in the minors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

What's the worst that can happen?  He fall down trying to get a ball and end up with a concussion?  No way that could happen to a guy that played a bunch of outfield in the minors.

 

9 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

How?  Did Wilkerson get a bunch of outfield reps?  Did Mancini?

How many games do you think a guy needs to be an upgrade over Smtih?

It's all about service time manipulation with Mountcastle, has been since last season.

Mountcastle may already be an upgrade over Smith, but that says nothing. Wilkerson certainly surpised, although he's not much of a prospect so we didn't have much to lose. 

If Mountcastle was destined to be a DH, then by all means bring him up. But I think there's value in trying to bring him along at a pace that's best for him. Perhaps that pace is more coaching and instruction before we try to pass him as an OF? That's my main point. 

Unfortunately, normally we'd get to track his progress defensively in the minors. We don't get to see how he's being coached and the reps he's getting. 

 

 

 

Edited by Bubble Buddy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bubble Buddy said:

 

Mountcastle may already be an upgrade over Smith, but that says nothing. Wilkerson certainly surpised, although he's not much of a prospect so we didn't have much to lose. 

If Mountcastle was destined to be a DH, then by all means bring him up. But I think there's value in trying to bring him along at a pace that's best for him. Perhaps that pace is more coaching and instruction before we try to pass him as an OF? That's my main point. It's a plausible scenario. 

 

 

It isn't plausible.

Can you name any player that needed this many reps to learn to play LEFT FIELD?  If he hasn't gotten it yet more time taking fungos at Bowie ain't going to fix him.

This is not about his ability to play left field.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

It isn't plausible.

Can you name any player that needed this many reps to learn to play LEFT FIELD?  If he hasn't gotten it yet more time taking fungos at Bowie ain't going to fix him.

This is not about his ability to play left field.

 

I understand your distrust of the organization. I also understand the service time manipulation game. But I also don't find reason to be overly critical of Elias yet and I don't mind taking him at his word for now.

 And again, if he's BSing because of service time, well, that's an MLB wide problem, not just us. 

The article below mentions in detail the work they are doing with Mountcastle. 

"Executive vice president/general manager Mike Elias said this was “a unique opportunity to get some real development done,” both with his plate discipline and at his new position in left field. Mountcastle is getting targeted coaching at both."

https://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/orioles/bs-sp-orioles-ryan-mountcastle-bowie-camp-20200807-getfuiiepnetbjofa7vhkcd2xa-story.html

Edited by Bubble Buddy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • 100%! I say abolish divisions, play a fully balanced schedule and take the top 4 or 6 or 8 or whatever teams in each league to the playoffs. 
    • The question was asked, a few months ago, whether winning the division was necessary. A lively debate resulted, some saying the division didn’t matter(“just make the playoffs and anything can happen”) and some taking the opposite view. I wanted the Division and I’m disgusted the play has been so bad. And I haaaate the Yankees( sports hate. I’m sure they are all great guys in person.) It will not magically improve, and I despair of winning more than two more games…not even 90 wins. And in a Homer–prone park, how many homers will the Os give up? The thought is not comforting. And there’s little reason to think things will improve against the Tigers or Royals. But at least: 1) next year they will hopefully have Bautista and the position players healthy. 2) The farm has very few MLB-ready players so there won’t be so much bouncing back and forth. Hopefully the guys can settle in and just play. 3) the Os will be looking for a fourth consecutive winning season, which hasn’t happened since the 70s So there’s that…
    • I was about to post a similar thread, but despite my memory issues, I recalled this thread.  I still find myself enjoying sports less and less.  The issue is not my teams, but myself.  It's a sad reality that I'm bothered when my team doesn't win, or does win, but wins in a way that is not how I wanted them to!  LOL!  It's ridiculous.  Frankly, I'm somewhat ashamed. The O's are very likely going to the playoffs.  But instead of being happy about that, I'm more concerned with how awful we've been and how little I expect from them as the post-season draws near.  A real fan loves his team and sticks with them, through thick and thin.  It's absolutely okay to be critical, even frustrated, at times, but when those are the default and dominant expressions, it makes me feel... less than.  It's like this with all my favorite teams (O's/Ravens/Terps).  It's therapeutic, in a way, to reveal such truths.  But the quest to find a way to enjoy sports again, to enjoy what my teams are doing, is a process that is taking longer than I'd hoped.  
    • I wouldn’t say I’m fired up.  I’d like to do enough to (1) win the season series (which only takes one win), (2) clinch a playoff spot (which probably only takes one win, depending what other teams do, and (3) improves our chances of getting the no. 4 seed (which might take a couple of wins, depending how other teams do).   
    • It feels like a foregone conclusion that the O’s sneak in with the third wild card spot and then lose the wild card series. So it just doesn’t really matter all that much what happens from here on out.    Then again, get hot at the right time and this could still be a World Series contender. I have to see some fire in this team before I entertain that thought though.
    • I am not really fired up per se.  I am just hoping that something happens that is different than what we have seen for months.  A late comeback to win the game.  A big inning of 4 runs or more.  Some big hits from Adley or Holliday.   1 win means we win the season series against everyone in the East for the second year in a row.  That would be great.  And even if we lose, I am hoping that watching the Yankees celebrate in front of them and the fans celebrate around them fires them up.   
    • I feel like I asked once years ago, but can someone please explain the acronym “MFY?”
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...