Jump to content

I Know It’s Early, But How Can ESPN Have Us Ranked Dead Last?


ORIOLE33

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Enjoy Terror said:

This is where you defend that the 2-7 Pirates are better than the Orioles.

Don't really feel the need to defend anything.  ESPN's power rankings are subjective, and I'm pretty sure that over the years they haven't perfectly lined up with win-loss records.

Who cares at this point if ESPN ranks the O's 30th or 29th or 25th or whatever? In the end they aren't a good team (in my opinion), they just had a good week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Beef Supreme said:

Sports. Not politics. Postponed games. Players on IL.

If any writer is not taking all that into account -- especially the not playing games part -- than they are living in a bubble.

Thank you.

I was kidding. Should have been clearer about that. 

My attempts at humor have been causing me trouble for over 60 years, so I can't really blame emails. But I'd like to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

I was kidding. Should have been clearer about that. 

My attempts at humor have been causing me trouble for over 60 years, so I can't really blame emails. But I'd like to.

Ha! OK. It is funny how the written word can be misinterpreted, when if I had heard the same words out of your mouth I would have understood immediately. Happens to me, as well, far too often. Peace!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jagwar said:

Don't really feel the need to defend anything.  ESPN's power rankings are subjective, and I'm pretty sure that over the years they haven't perfectly lined up with win-loss records.

Who cares at this point if ESPN ranks the O's 30th or 29th or 25th or whatever? In the end they aren't a good team (in my opinion), they just had a good week

Meanwhile, the Marlins had the worst week any team could have. Seven losses would have been better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ORIOLE33 said:

There’s plenty of time to see if they’re a bad team, but regardless, they’re 5-3. As we speak right now, they’re not the worst team in baseball. 

Your formula is [(results of last eight games) + 0% of everything else we know about baseball].  I'd probably use something a little different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always thought power rankings partly had to do with the perception if you're for real or not.  It doesn't surprise me that the Orioles are ranked last, but that's because no one's taking them seriously.  It's a nice start but ultimately it's...exactly that.  If they're as bad as we've expected them to be from here on out, well, what'd anyone expect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I always thought power rankings partly had to do with the perception if you're for real or not.  It doesn't surprise me that the Orioles are ranked last, but that's because no one's taking them seriously.  It's a nice start but ultimately it's...exactly that.  If they're as bad as we've expected them to be from here on out, well, what'd anyone expect?

That was kind of my point with the Pirates. They were expected to be bad and are bad. Certainly the Orioles situation is worth more than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Enjoy Terror said:

That was kind of my point with the Pirates. They were expected to be bad and are bad. Certainly the Orioles situation is worth more than that.

Eh, I guess.  I mean, the Orioles really have to prove it before anyone will take notice and give credit, it needs to occur for an extended period...as much as an extended period as you can have with a 60 game season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I always thought power rankings partly had to do with the perception if you're for real or not.  It doesn't surprise me that the Orioles are ranked last, but that's because no one's taking them seriously.  It's a nice start but ultimately it's...exactly that.  If they're as bad as we've expected them to be from here on out, well, what'd anyone expect?

Ah, I never knew what power rankings were supposed to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • From here https://www.mlb.com/orioles/stats/ops/regular-season
    • Where are you getting your stats from that's not correct looking at OPS.
    • On the O's this year, Martinez would have been: 5th in OPS 5th in AVG 6th in HRs in 120 games
    • I think PFF is grading Roquan badly because the safeties behind him are playing like ass and it's making him look bad.  If teams are going to attack him over the middle on crossing routes with WRs (like KC did with Rice) he doesn't really stand much of a chance if the safeties behind him don't throw him a bone.  He's still a huge help in the run game.   In general I think PFF assigns a little too much blame to linebackers on passes over the middle, so unless you're an elite coverage guy at LB it's really hard to grade well.  The flip side to this is that teams probably need to adjust their coverage areas to account for the fact that LBs aren't going to be able to hold down WRs for long.  
    • Thanks. This tells me what my eyes have seen with Roquan. He's been a liability in coverage and the fact that Simpson is ahead of him is not good for our defensive leader. Do you have the PFF grades for offense too?
    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...