Jump to content

Hunter Harvey looked less impressive this year


Frobby

Recommended Posts

To me, Hunter Harvey never looked that good this year.    Velocity was good but movement seemed flat, and secondary stuff almost non-existent.    His ERA was good until allowing a 3-run homer yesterday (only two runs were earned), but he just hasn’t looked as good.   Fewer strikeouts, more hard contact, less late life on his pitches.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

To me, Hunter Harvey never looked that good this year.    Velocity was good but movement seemed flat, and secondary stuff almost non-existent.    His ERA was good until allowing a 3-run homer yesterday (only two runs were earned), but he just hasn’t looked as good.   Fewer strikeouts, more hard contact, less late life on his pitches.   

To me, his health was what I was after. I'll watch him again next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has a total of 14.1 ML innings.

when comparing this year to last year, he threw more strikes (both years he has been above average) and missed almost the same numbers of bats.

His P/PA were way down this year.  I wonder if that was an effort on his part to try and get outs more efficiently w/r/t pitch count?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, wildcard said:

So what you guys are saying is the SSS is only meaningful when you are evaluating it.  Not when I do.

No.  I don’t think this year’s SSS is all that meaningful, nor was last year’s.    I’m just giving my impressions of how he looked, not trying to draw any conclusions about what it means for the future.    And I wish we had a bigger sample to discuss, but we don’t.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

No.  I don’t think this year’s SSS is all that meaningful, nor was last year’s.    I’m just giving my impressions of how he looked, not trying to draw any conclusions about what it means for the future.    And I wish we had a bigger sample to discuss, but we don’t.   

So my thoughts on SSS  will be just impressions from now on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

I agree. 

Some folks think he should be considered untouchable in trade talks and I don't know why.

He looks like a useful piece, when healthy, but he didn't look like an overpowering weapon out there.

Is it really useful to talk about trade chips and untouchables when we here can't even figure out if the guy is going to be healthy for 20 straight innings one day?  If someone says they wouldn't trade Harvey, well, okay, nobody's really asking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wildcard said:

So my thoughts on SSS  will be just impressions from now on.

Another thing I’ll say about this: it’s one thing to look at a relatively young, inexperienced player and give impressions based on watching them in an SSS.    It’s another to get excited about a player who over a short period of time has exceeded his typical performance over a much longer period.    And I am not saying that short term performance never signifies long term improvement or growth.    But often, in that situation, a hot streak is just a hot streak. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • On #1: the question is whether all of Mayo, Kjerstad, Cowser, and Holliday have everyday roles or if are some platooned or held back in Norfolk or traded? If they all play everyday, there’s not really a meaty role to offer to a new bat. In the various post-mortems, this seems to be one of the biggest points of differences among posters.  Some want no logjams while others want one or more proven MOO professional hitters and don’t want to rely on Holliday or Mayo. My view is in the middle of the spectrum. I think at least one of Cowser or Mullins needs to sit vs. LHP, so we need a lefty masher capable of playing left field at Camden.  I think we may consider trading Mounty to make room for Mayo.
    • I find #8 to be an interesting one. On the one hand, McCann seems well-liked, he brings some toughness and veteran presence, and he actually had his best offensive season since 2020. At 35, you can probably have him for a 1 year deal if you want. And Basallo isn't really that close to coming up and catching just yet. He's a deep 2nd half kind of callup if you need him. And it's not like the free agent backup catcher market is much better than McCann. On the other hand, I have a sour taste in my mouth from game 1 where he couldn't make contact with men on base. Adley certainly didn't get any better under his wise tutelage. And maybe there are guys out there who surpass McCann defensively and bring a different wrinkle to the clubhouse. So I wouldn't be mad about a change. 
    • Actually 10 - I fat fingered the post button before I was ready.
    • This is my thought process regarding the pitching staff next season, ideally we resign Burnes but if not another TOR like Snell or Fried need to be signed this offseason.  Eflin GRod and Kremer are a really solid 2,3,4 the 5 spot is open to competition but realistically there will probably be some injuries or fatigue that require all of these guys contributing. 
    • 1. Where on the spectrum should Elias anchor between “let the kids play” vs. “sign proven bats”? 2. How do we get a right-handed bat to come here given Walltimore? 3. How many years do you think we should be willing to commit to a starting pitcher?  Where do you expect Elias to fall? 4. Between vets, rookies, and prospects, who can we trade / should we trade / do we trade for pitching or a bat? 5. What budget will ownership give to Elias? To what extent will he max out on his constraint? 6. What coaching and front-office personnel changes should/will we make? What about infrastructure or changes to org philosophies? 7. Whom, if anyone, should we try to extend, considering their agent and what they will likely demand financially?  8. For backup catcher, do we re-up McCann or go in a different direction? 9. Does it make sense to sign a blue chip reliever given the spotty track record of those signings (e.g., of 25 relievers signing for > $3MM last year, 2 had WAR of at least 0.5 in both fWAR and bWAR)? 10. Does Elias make any outside-the-box moves  (e.g., convert Akin to SP, sign a FA infielder, move JH to CF, find the next Suarez)?
    • Hope to take my kids but it will depend on the ticket prices.  I couldn’t believe how expensive the tickets were when they were in DC
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...