Jump to content

The Reds need offense, the O's need pitching.


GuidoSarducci

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I would agree with this.  
 

The only player that could have real value to them would be Santander.  Maybe you could get a top 10 (bottom of the top 10) prospect for him.  
 

A young, high upside OFer making no money is appealing to a lot of teams..it’s just a matter of how much you believe in him as a player.

Oh, I thought you were agreeing about hypothetical trades being your wheelhouse :) 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Santander was the O's best offensive player this year, and he's controllable for some time.  It's not like the O's have some great offense -- or some great defense.  Trading him makes little sense unless the O's think he's an injury risk going forward or because the player(s) coming back is someone they obviously couldn't refuse -- a steal of some kind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CheeryO said:

Santander was the O's best offensive player this year, and he's controllable for some time.  It's not like the O's have some great offense -- or some great defense.  Trading him makes little sense unless the O's think he's an injury risk going forward or because the player(s) coming back is someone they obviously couldn't refuse -- a steal of some kind.

Mountcastle had a higher OPS+, wOBA, and wRC+.  So did Iglesias.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, CheeryO said:

Santander was the O's best offensive player this year, and he's controllable for some time.  It's not like the O's have some great offense -- or some great defense.  Trading him makes little sense unless the O's think he's an injury risk going forward or because the player(s) coming back is someone they obviously couldn't refuse -- a steal of some kind.

Santander plays the one position where the Orioles have real depth.  He isn't a guy who walks a lot and his BA isn't great, so he will struggle to be even a 320 OBP guy.  He plays an adequate OF and has a lot of power.  He certainly could be a 2-3 WAR type guy and perhaps spike a year or 2 of being a 4+ WAR guy.  The upside is there for that.

Still, he is replaceable for the team and if he can help fetch you a much larger position of need, you make that move.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Reds have Winker, Senzel and Castellanos in the OF.  Winker had a slow start to the season, but was one of the hottest hitters in the majors for a couple weeks.  Senzel was injured.  I do not expect the Reds are going to deal for a starting OFer to supplant one of these three unless they move Senzel back to the infield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/4/2020 at 5:37 PM, hoosiers said:

The Reds have Winker, Senzel and Castellanos in the OF.  Winker had a slow start to the season, but was one of the hottest hitters in the majors for a couple weeks.  Senzel was injured.  I do not expect the Reds are going to deal for a starting OFer to supplant one of these three unless they move Senzel back to the infield.

On top of Winker, Senzel, and Castellanos, they have Ervin, Aquino and Van Meter. 

Maybe Santander could crack that in a platoon role?  I don’t think they’d give up what Santander is worth to us. However, if you go with the thinking that no player is truly worth anything to us unless they will be here when we “contend”, then we should look to deal him. I just don’t know if Cinncy is the best fit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/4/2020 at 2:37 PM, hoosiers said:

The Reds have Winker, Senzel and Castellanos in the OF.  Winker had a slow start to the season, but was one of the hottest hitters in the majors for a couple weeks.  Senzel was injured.  I do not expect the Reds are going to deal for a starting OFer to supplant one of these three unless they move Senzel back to the infield.

Winker mostly DH'd.   

Senzel plays CF. He was drafted with the Reds 1st pick (#2 overall) in 2016.  He should be locked in as their CF at least for next year.

Their starting LF was 32-year old Shogo Akiyama who posted a .654 OPS.  Even DJ Stewart would be an upgrade there. Of course, they could be looking for more of a sure-thing upgrade, but that requires either money or surrendering prospects.  

Any single player we have, would not generate interest, but if we bundle some guys together, it might work.

Edited by GuidoSarducci
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I've been thinking about #2 a lot and wondering why this didn't come up at Elias' press conference.  I think the answer if you have to target a RH bat who isn't solely power-focused or chasing HR numbers, but who is otherwise a caliber of lefty-masher better than Mounty. Or, you force that hitter here via trade.
    • Last offseason with John (I am so poor) Angelos still in charge, along with the depth in the upper minor leagues it made sense to make a trade for someone like Burnes.  I don't think Elias should be looking at making a trade this offseason using any of our young talent.  It is time for Rubenstein to open the checkbook and land us a TOR starter and a big bat.  The days of having too many prospects is over, I want to see us have some solid depth options in AAA if we need it.
    • On #1: the question is whether all of Mayo, Kjerstad, Cowser, and Holliday have everyday roles or if are some platooned or held back in Norfolk or traded? If they all play everyday, there’s not really a meaty role to offer to a new bat. In the various post-mortems, this seems to be one of the biggest points of differences among posters.  Some want no logjams while others want one or more proven MOO professional hitters and don’t want to rely on Holliday or Mayo. My view is in the middle of the spectrum. I think at least one of Cowser or Mullins needs to sit vs. LHP, so we need a lefty masher capable of playing left field at Camden.  I think we may consider trading Mounty to make room for Mayo.
    • I find #8 to be an interesting one. On the one hand, McCann seems well-liked, he brings some toughness and veteran presence, and he actually had his best offensive season since 2020. At 35, you can probably have him for a 1 year deal if you want. And Basallo isn't really that close to coming up and catching just yet. He's a deep 2nd half kind of callup if you need him. And it's not like the free agent backup catcher market is much better than McCann. On the other hand, I have a sour taste in my mouth from game 1 where he couldn't make contact with men on base. Adley certainly didn't get any better under his wise tutelage. And maybe there are guys out there who surpass McCann defensively and bring a different wrinkle to the clubhouse. So I wouldn't be mad about a change. 
    • Actually 10 - I fat fingered the post button before I was ready.
    • This is my thought process regarding the pitching staff next season, ideally we resign Burnes but if not another TOR like Snell or Fried need to be signed this offseason.  Eflin GRod and Kremer are a really solid 2,3,4 the 5 spot is open to competition but realistically there will probably be some injuries or fatigue that require all of these guys contributing. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...