Jump to content

Effect of Tatis deal on Adley


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

On 2/18/2021 at 3:16 PM, Sports Guy said:

I continue to believe C defense is a vastly overrated thing in baseball, especially in an era where no one steals bases.

I think that having a plus-defensive catcher is overrated.  But having Cisco and his noodle arm can potentially be costly.  There are enough fast guys out there that exploit the crap out of a catcher that can't throw well.  It's practically a guaranteed steal for those guys.  You need to be at least average IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hallas said:

I think that having a plus-defensive catcher is overrated.  But having Cisco and his noodle arm can potentially be costly.  There are enough fast guys out there that exploit the crap out of a catcher that can't throw well.  It's practically a guaranteed steal for those guys.  You need to be at least average IMO.

But the numbers don't seem to support that.

So if they could run but don't who cares?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Hallas said:

I think that having a plus-defensive catcher is overrated.  But having Cisco and his noodle arm can potentially be costly.  There are enough fast guys out there that exploit the crap out of a catcher that can't throw well.  It's practically a guaranteed steal for those guys.  You need to be at least average IMO.

I get what you are saying but it’s still not something I would be concerned about. Now, if that catcher is also garbage hitting, that’s a different story.  But if they are a plus with the bat, I don’t really care.

I just think the whole C pitchers is vastly overrated in terms of being “so valuable”.

I would trade a top C for a top position player (or top pitcher) at practically at spot on the Diamond..of course, salary, age and service time comes into play with that but all things being equal, I’m good with that concept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I get what you are saying but it’s still not something I would be concerned about. Now, if that catcher is also garbage hitting, that’s a different story.  But if they are a plus with the bat, I don’t really care.

I just think the whole C pitchers is vastly overrated in terms of being “so valuable”.

I would trade a top C for a top position player (or top pitcher) at practically at spot on the Diamond..of course, salary, age and service time comes into play with that but all things being equal, I’m good with that concept.

I think that catchers are mostly valuable because no one wants to be catcher, and because so few people can play the position without their knees falling off at age 30.  I agree that there is some overrating as far as defensive catchers is concerned, but I'm not sure if I'm necessarily willing to trade a top flight catcher for any other position.  Especially not a corner outfielder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Hallas said:

I think that having a plus-defensive catcher is overrated.  But having Cisco and his noodle arm can potentially be costly.  There are enough fast guys out there that exploit the crap out of a catcher that can't throw well.  It's practically a guaranteed steal for those guys.  You need to be at least average IMO.

I think throwing out basestealers is probably the most overrated part of catcher defense.    Teams attempt a steal less than once per game, yet a catcher has to frame about 150 pitches, probably block 5-10 pitches in the dirt with runners on base, chase down foul flies that have crazy spin, field bunts and make quick decisions where to throw, and occasionally receive a throw and make a tag at the plate.    You can have a good defensive catcher who is not particularly good at throwing out basestealers.   

The evidence does not suggest that Sisco is one of those.   

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hallas said:

I think that catchers are mostly valuable because no one wants to be catcher, and because so few people can play the position without their knees falling off at age 30.  I agree that there is some overrating as far as defensive catchers is concerned, but I'm not sure if I'm necessarily willing to trade a top flight catcher for any other position.  Especially not a corner outfielder.

But that COer is likely to play a lot more(most top catchers are playing 140ish games a year) and be healthier.

That being said, I tend to agree that I may not trade for a COer but it depends on the player.  I certainly would trade one for a CFer, SS, Third baseman and perhaps a first baseman who is a top flight bat.  
 

Second base?  Maybe.  Depends on the player.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Frobby said:

I think throwing out basestealers is probably the most overrated part of catcher defense.    Teams attempt a steal less than once per game, yet a catcher has to frame about 150 pitches, probably block 5-10 pitches in the dirt with runners on base, chase down foul flies that have crazy spin, field bunts and make quick decisions where to throw, and occasionally receive a throw and make a tag at the plate.    You can have a good defensive catcher who is not particularly good at throwing out basestealers.   

The evidence does not suggest that Sisco is one of those.   

Well he's both a terrible pitch framer and a terrible thrower.  

 

In 2019 the difference between the best and worst catcher for basestealing was 15 runs, or 1.5 wins.  This is skewed by the fact that Realmuto is a country mile better than anyone else.  The 2nd best vs worst is 9 runs.  That's enough to turn a backup into a regular, or a regular into an all star. 

 

edit to add:

The difference in overall defensive contribution according to Fangraphs between the best and worst catchers is 35 runs.  For SS it's 22 runs.  So basestealing is about 30-40% of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • But that is not what you said. You said he’s a bad fielder, just not quite Trumbo-tier. Thus, you were stating he is close to as bad a fielder as Trumbo was, which is not correct. Generally speaking, no player makes up the loss of offensive value with defensive value as the age. It is usually one of the first things to go. I was not making any sort of argument that he was going to make up declining offense with defense, just pointing out that you made a preposterous statement.
    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
    • It's not the money, it's the years.  I wouldn't mind signing him for a year or two, even at what I'd consider to be stupid money.  But what I DON'T agree with is signing him for any more than 2-3 years as I don't think he's going to age well.  And I expect him to get more than 3 years from someone, so I'm a hard pass.  Can we afford him?  Money wise, sure.  But I don't want to see us stuck with him 4-5 years down the road when his skillset has greatly diminished, but he's still playing every day because we owe him a lot of money and a lot of loyalty.  Let some other club take that risk, get the QO pick and move on.  
    • Santander does exactly ONE thing very well: Hit HRs He doesn't hit for average, he doesn't get on base, he's a very slow runner, and he is a very poor defender. If he stops hitting HRs so often, his value completely evaporates and his contract basically becomes dead money, and the Orioles cannot afford to eat large amounts of dead money like the Dodgers, Mets, and Yankees of the world. I am simply using Trumbo, whose basic tool kit is very similar to Santander's, as a fairly recent, Orioles-related cautionary tale. Trumbo had his big walk year with the Orioles at age 30 and instead of doing the smart, obvious thing and taking the free draft pick, we gave him a big money extension that everyone except the FO knew was probably going to end poorly. Baseball Savant has Santander in the 22nd percentile in terms of overall fielding value. However you want to slice it, he isn't going to make up any lost value from declining offense with his defense. If his ability to slug goes south, the whole contract goes with it, because he has no other tools to make up for that with.
    • Santander is -2 OAA this year. He’s averagish to below average. There but there are much worse defensive right fielders such as Adolis Garcia and Castellanos -9, Lane Thomas and Renfroe -8, and Soto -4. Acuna and Tatis are also -2 OAA.  In 2016, Mark Trumbo was -15 OAA. They’re not even in the same universe.
    • Anthony Santander (age 27-29): .245 / .317 / .477 / .794    124 OPS+   9.0 rWAR Mark Trumbo (age 27-29): .244 / .299 / .443 / .742   105 OPS+  2.6 rWAR Is it really very meaningful that Trumbo was the better player when they were significantly younger? 29-year-old Santander is a better player by miles than Trumbo at the same age, and he has been for years. I think that’s what matters most to how you’d project them over the next few years.
    • I love Tony and I honestly think we are gonna miss his veteran leadership as much as anything. I’m very happy we have him for this year. But I do think he’d be a bad long term investment. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...