Jump to content

Mid-March Orioles spring training update: Good news stories


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, Philip said:

I don’t understand why everybody is so high on Felix and Harvey. They have a past, but they certainly don’t have a present, and I can’t think of any reason to keep the north. Unless you really put stock in “veteran presence,” Which is a stupid reason to give a roster spot to go with an 85 mile an hour fastball and no secondaries. They offered nothing they shouldn’t go anywhere. Meanwhile I want Wells to make it, maybe green, and I was a fan of Matson until he left

Who is high on Felix and Harvey? I liked them as cheap options with some upside, but I don't think anyone is under any illusions about their likely value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

Who is high on Felix and Harvey? I liked them as cheap options with some upside, but I don't think anyone is under any illusions about their likely value.

Anybody who thinks right now that they deserve a spot is high on them. Felix especially hasn't shown anything except that he is done. Neither one deserves a spot, and even if not too many guys have been appreciably better, would be better to give the spot someone with a future instead of some of the past.

Yes I agree that they had some possible upside, but they have shown that they don’t. It was worthwhile signing them, but now send them on their way.

Edited by Philip
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Philip said:

I don’t understand why everybody is so high on Felix and Harvey.

Are they?  I haven't seen much enthusiasm.  I think everyone has a pretty good idea of the kind of players they are at this point.  If Felix is in the rotation I expect a performance similar to Chris Tillman's last year with us.  He had nothing left in the tank and his pitching line reflected it pretty well.  Those were some hard starts to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me Zimmermann is the feel good story of the spring so far, and I think he may be the John Means of 2021.

Tony, I disagree with this statement you made:  “He already looks much more like the guy the Orioles saw last spring then the one who made two appearances late in the year last year.”    Zimmermann had a terrible debut (3 IP, 5 ER) but his second outing actually was extremely impressive (4 IP, 2 H, 1 R, 5 K’s).   His combined numbers for the two outings don’t look good but that’s because the first outing was so lousy.   But he really looked good that second time out.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Barnaby Graves said:

Are they?  I haven't seen much enthusiasm.  I think everyone has a pretty good idea of the kind of players they are at this point.  If Felix is in the rotation I expect a performance similar to Chris Tillman's last year with us.  He had nothing left in the tank and his pitching line reflected it pretty well.  Those were some hard starts to watch.

See the comment I posted just before yours

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Philip said:

See the comment I posted just before yours

I guess it depends what the team is trying to accomplish by having them on the roster instead of literally anyone else.  The obsession with service time is getting really monotonous.  There has to be SOMEONE in the organization who would be a more interesting starter than a Felix Hernandez with a mid-80s fastball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Barnaby Graves said:

I guess it depends what the team is trying to accomplish by having them on the roster instead of literally anyone else.  The obsession with service time is getting really monotonous.  There has to be SOMEONE in the organization who would be a more interesting starter than a Felix Hernandez with a mid-80s fastball.

Exactly, plus, Lopez has pitched better, Almost everyone has actually pitched better.

And in case I haven’t made it clear, I put very little stock in “veteran presence”

That’s like that Cologne you put on before you go to the bar to pick up chicks.

”Hey babe, you want some ‘veteran presence’?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Philip said:

I don’t understand why everybody is so high on Felix and Harvey. They have a past, but they certainly don’t have a present, and I can’t think of any reason to keep the north. Unless you really put stock in “veteran presence,” Which is a stupid reason to give a roster spot to go with an 85 mile an hour fastball and no secondaries. They offered nothing they shouldn’t go anywhere. Meanwhile I want Wells to make it, maybe green, and I was a fan of Matson until he left

The poster you quoted never said that. The main reason to keep them is that there is little downside and possible upside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

The poster you quoted never said that. The main reason to keep them is that there is little downside and possible upside.

I didn’t say he said that, and if you read my comment, you’ll see I didn’t.

I am saying there is no reason for either to make the team. Sign them, sure. Give them a chance, sure. But they haven’t earned a spot, so at this point, they shouldn't make the team. End of story. If they suddenly improve over the next two weeks, we can revisit the question, but for now, they don’t deserve a spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Philip said:

I didn’t say he said that, and if you read my comment, you’ll see I didn’t.

I am saying there is no reason for either to make the team. Sign them, sure. Give them a chance, sure. But they haven’t earned a spot, so at this point, they shouldn't make the team. End of story. If they suddenly improve over the next two weeks, we can revisit the question, but for now, they don’t deserve a spot.

I'm a big fan of King Felix, but I don't think he has enough left in the tank. This isn't 1993 Fernando Valenzuela grinding out a respectable season as a bottom of the rotation starter. Maybe he will turn it on in the next couple weeks and that would be cool, but it seems unlikely. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Philip said:

What does Matt Harvey offer? He’s been mediocre at best, and I’d much rather have Sceroler or Jannis or anyone.

If Harvey can prove to be effective, and that's still a big if right now, he offers what Galvis or Franco offers, and that's a chance to be moved this year for some potential piece if they play good. I'm not sure I see the upside in Sceroler and Jannis will be in the organization and needs to prove he can get AAA hitters out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Westburg, Urias and Mountcastle are coming back.  We will have better infield defense and much better RH hitting options.  O'Hearn can go back to being a platoon player or pinch hitter.   The O's team that goes to the playoffs will be better than the O's team we've watched lately.    Jordan Westburg would have turned that double play today.  
    • I think reasonable to question why not send Holliday on Gunnar double, forcing DET to make quality throw home on a fast runner and worst case have Gunnar at 3rd with one out.  Then on subsequent play, given Os general philosophy on running on contact when infield grounder with runner on 3rd, why not have Holliday dash to home, again making DET make quality throw with worst case Gunnar again at 3rd base one out.  In retrospect, I am confused at both of these, even if low probability of scoring, seems like should take those chances when only need one run to win the game. 
    • This is an emotional reaction and a terrible one at that. Mansilini is not a problem on this team. And the pop fly with Jackson Holliday on 3rd, he should not have been sent home because the Feilder make a heck of a catch and they instantly threw the ball to the 3rd basemen. If Jackson would have tagged, he would have either gotten gotten himself thrown out at the plate, or been caught in a run down. Tell him to tag up would have been foolish.
    • So I guess you won’t be watching, right?
    • Special K is a reference to Ketamine.  You know, you could have said, Can, I did not know it was a drug reference, I can see why you would be opposed to that.  Instead you accuse me of insinuating that you have a drug habit. Do you think that giving a player the same nickname as a very common street name of a drug is a good idea? But your default reaction to any sort of criticism is to attack the person that has the audacity to question you, well that and to harp on how old you are as if that is relevant information.
    • I agree with those moves, but I could also see Elias and Hyde wanting to keep Holliday on the roster for the rest of the season and the playoffs to get some experience since he's going to be a core part of the team for what will hopefully be multiple playoff runs. I'd understand that line of thinking, and would be fine with it. But I do think Holliday should be on the bench the rest of the way in that scenario.  The only move I desperately want to see is Eloy released. He's such a bad player and such an insult to good baseball. I'll be relieved when he's gone. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...