Jump to content

20 round draft in 2021


Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Sure. Why wouldn’t it be?  Less minor league teams mean you don’t need to draft as many guys which means, overall, you save money.

20 seems pretty skimpy.   You can’t stock a minor league team with that.    Sure you have some international guys too, but it doesn’t leave much room for error.
I guess we’ll see more undrafted free agent signings.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

20 seems pretty skimpy.   You can’t stock a minor league team with that.    Sure you have some international guys too, but it doesn’t leave much room for error.
I guess we’ll see more undrafted free agent signings.   

I think the undrafted bit is key.  Most of the folks drafted after round 20 could just be signed as UFA.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
On 4/2/2021 at 7:03 PM, Frobby said:

20 seems pretty skimpy.   You can’t stock a minor league team with that.    Sure you have some international guys too, but it doesn’t leave much room for error.
I guess we’ll see more undrafted free agent signings.   

Or you have guys bouncing around the minors for longer than they would have otherwise - with no real chance at getting called up to the bigs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/2/2021 at 10:03 PM, Frobby said:

20 seems pretty skimpy.   You can’t stock a minor league team with that.    Sure you have some international guys too, but it doesn’t leave much room for error.
I guess we’ll see more undrafted free agent signings.   

Actually, this is better for the guys who get drafted after the 20th round. Now they can be free agents and potentially get multiple offers and be able to pick the organization that he may be better fit in with more opportunity. If I'm a  catcher, do I want to sign with a team that drafted three catchers already  or one that may have more of an opportunity for me to play right away?

I like the 20 rounds. With free agency and DSL players that should be plenty and allow the cream to rise instead of drafting a bunch of senior college signs with very little chance of becoming major leaguers.

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Just now, OriolesMagic83 said:

Don't teams sign about 25 guys every year?  A lot of the guys in the lower rounds below 20, take a college scholarship, which has a lot more value than $10k or whatever they offer late round picks. 

Three things.

1- I don't think that many scholarships are out there for Baseball.

2- Teams can include money for college without infringing on their draft pool number.

3- A decent number of the guys drafted are already in college.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Three things.

1- I don't think that many scholarships are out there for Baseball.

2- Teams can include money for college without infringing on their draft pool number.

3- A decent number of the guys drafted are already in college.

Each D1 team has 11.7 scholarships to give out. No one gets a full scholarship, and the top guys get about half of one. They do have other funds to use, grants and things like that. Kevin O’Sullivan (UF) told me that no player gets a full scholarship. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jammer7 said:

Each D1 team has 11.7 scholarships to give out. No one gets a full scholarship, and the top guys get about half of one. They do have other funds to use, grants and things like that. Kevin O’Sullivan (UF) told me that no player gets a full scholarship. 

A typical D1 guy will wind up with a scholarship that is one third of cost of attendance. A highly regarded pitcher would be more like 40% or 50%. That's one of the reasons academics are stressed because coaches are looking for a guy who can combine his athletic scholarship with academic money. 

And there are differences by state. Georgia has a program available to their high school graduates that pays some or all of their first year of a Georgia college. Lottery money is available in some states to pay for college costs. Louisiana has a good program I believe. Vandy has private funds they can access for guys they want. 

To corn's point above, MLB teams will provide funds for college as a part of a standard contract. They look at the cost of attendance at the school a kid is committed to and agree to provide that amount. As the years have gone by, there have been limitations on when that money is available and when it must be used, or lost. As you would guess, when a high school kid is weighing options between signing to play pro baseball or go to college, the college funds offered by the standard contract seem far away and less significant because most guys in that situation firmly believe they'll make it in MLB and play for a dozen years. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, 7Mo said:

A typical D1 guy will wind up with a scholarship that is one third of cost of attendance. A highly regarded pitcher would be more like 40% or 50%. That's one of the reasons academics are stressed because coaches are looking for a guy who can combine his athletic scholarship with academic money. 

And there are differences by state. Georgia has a program available to their high school graduates that pays some or all of their first year of a Georgia college. Lottery money is available in some states to pay for college costs. Louisiana has a good program I believe. Vandy has private funds they can access for guys they want. 

To corn's point above, MLB teams will provide funds for college as a part of a standard contract. They look at the cost of attendance at the school a kid is committed to and agree to provide that amount. As the years have gone by, there have been limitations on when that money is available and when it must be used, or lost. As you would guess, when a high school kid is weighing options between signing to play pro baseball or go to college, the college funds offered by the standard contract seem far away and less significant because most guys in that situation firmly believe they'll make it in MLB and play for a dozen years. 

A really great post. I was under the impression the MLB contracts do not do the college funds anymore, just what I was told about two years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jammer7 said:

A really great post. I was under the impression the MLB contracts do not do the college funds anymore, just what I was told about two years ago.

They may not. My information is about 8-9 years old but that was the MLB speech at that time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • LOL.. IMO with a possible World Series championship on the line, that would be a professional malpractice type move. Especially with how things turned out last year trying to do it on the cheap at the deadline. IMO the stakes are too high this season to consider settling for bargain basement type shopping. There’s absolutely no credible reason to do that. Plus we are on the verge of messing up some guys’ careers like Stowers, Norby. You can’t just bury guys at AAA forever and never give them opportunities. And you can’t keep selling guys like Gunnar and Adley (who are ultra competitors) on “Well, we might really try next year. Maybe?” They don’t get these seasons of their careers back. And as much as I or any other poster may want to win, those guys on the field want it a WHOLE HECK OF A LOT MORE. IMO the org has to pick a course and do the right thing by the players (both those on the roster and those who belong in the Big Leagues).
    • No you don’t need a star but Vavra is below replacement level.  Norby may hit enough to justify his defense but the Os aren’t likely to go with poor D up the middle.
    • I have concerns about Holliday. I know SSS and the O's put a lot of pressure on the kid. T-shirt day, his first appearance. Really?? Who the F planned that? Still, I saw nothing that impressed me, hitting, fielding or arm. I know all the scouts had him one or close to it. I sometimes wonder if their ratings had anything to do with his father's success. So, the O's send him back down to fix him. I think this kid lived baseball and was probably given the best coaching on a near daily basis by his dad, players and coaches on the Cardinals. He's young and may be great. Sell high. Mayo...everyone looks at the O....where to hide him?  No way 3rd. This site is pretty tough on players that play poor D.
    • Passan drew this link between Dombrowski and Elias in his big piece for this week.     That's the basic question before us as Elias has excelled setting it all up...he's playing the highest stakes games now.      Adley's 3.5 years is perhaps ballpark similar to the timeframe the Phillies' great players remain a championship caliber nucleus.     Adley's final 3 years - unless payroll grows, the opportunity for rosters with Burnes-Santander-Kimbrel level supporting players may shrink a little. It's more about ensuring a window doesn't close without a team maximizing its opportunity. In this regard, the Phillies and Orioles are quite similar, though Dombrowski's counterpart in Baltimore, Mike Elias, gets a little more leeway because the Orioles' period of contention is longer than any team's. The Phillies' isn't short, by any means, but every year Bryce Harper (31 years old), Trea Turner (31), J.T. Realmuto (33), Zack Wheeler (34) and Aaron Nola (31) age is a year closer to an inevitable downturn. That's when, as an executive in charge, you push. And when it comes to a willingness to look past what a computer system suggests is proper value and potentially overpay for talent, nobody matches Dombrowski. Robert fits the bill and fills a need. 
    • Since I currently have Basallo 3rd, guess I have to be consistent and say he would go first.  I think Mayo and Basallo have the chance to be absolute impact power bats while I think Holliday has a chance to be a very good OBP guy with some pop.  I'd only say Basallo because he has more risk than the other other two and Orioles seem to be gradually transitioning from catch to 1B (he's basically split time between C and 1B since he was allowed to throw. Saying that, Basallo may have the highest ceiling bat wise of the three.  Mayo is the safest bet because he's major league ready now and has developed that game power now. The arm strength gives him a chance to stay at 3B for a bit but even if he transitions to 1B or RF he'll have value. Holliday hit just .222 in June in AAA but had a .444 OBP because if his ability to draw walks, walks that he might not get with major league umpires until he establishes himself.  Really, I'm not trading any of them, but if I had to, it's Basallo followed by Holliday.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...