Jump to content

Ask me about a prospect. (Early July)


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

Since we're discussing a relatively soft-tossing lefty, here's a fun scouting report from 1990 on a then up and coming one:  Tom Glavine scouting report, 1990 July 03 | Digital Collection (baseballhall.org)

Notice what pitch he used when behind in the count:  a fastball away.  He and Maddux lived on (actually a little bit off) the outside corner - getting the umps to stretch the zone.  Lol at his fastball velocity.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ruzious said:

Since we're discussing a relatively soft-tossing lefty, here's a fun scouting report from 1990 on a then up and coming one:  Tom Glavine scouting report, 1990 July 03 | Digital Collection (baseballhall.org)

Notice what pitch he used when behind in the count:  a fastball away.  He and Maddux lived on (actually a little bit off) the outside corner - getting the umps to stretch the zone.  Lol at his fastball velocity.  

Even more LOL that 86 mph was considered 55 velocity back then!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

I am a big fan of the command/control guys.   But it’s interesting how sometimes they get to the majors and don’t exhibit the same command/control they were reputed to have in the minors. I’m not sure if it’s nerves, or just the superior ability of major league hitters to lay off pitches out of the zone.

There's a few skill sets I like to see in young players that allow them imo to often outperform their "raw" talent level.  I'm not saying become superstars, but become starting level ML players when that wasn't the label put on them in the minors. One is a young pitcher with COMMAND of multiple pitchers.  Another is a young SS who has the ability to play at the ML level NOW.  Not just a kid with a ton of range and a huge arm, but one with the polish and fundamentals to not just be a projection.

Rom obviously falls into the former category.  I'm starting to get a little excited about Grenier who falls into the latter.

This biggest problem for these command/control guys at the upper levels is they become terrified to throw strikes because they get hammered, so even with all their command, they live six inches OFF the plate, which does them no favors.  It's why physical growth can be so important for them.  E-Rod burst onto the national scene when he got stronger and threw harder.  If Rom can follow a similar path, I believe he has the ability to be a similar kind of pitcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/7/2021 at 8:21 PM, Tony-OH said:

Well I can't lie, Weiters looked like the best player in the minors at his time. His dominance then was unparalled. Erik 
Bedard had the best stuff from a starter stand point. Grayson Rodriguez probably is the best now. 

Rutschman is right up there with Wieters from a prospect stand point of having a chance to be impact in both parts of the game.

I mean to ask about this.

Bedard looked better than Bundy did in Delmarva?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pickles said:

I mean to ask about this.

Bedard looked better than Bundy did in Delmarva?

I'm not talking about one year because if we want to talk about domination you don't get much more dominant than Matt Riley at Delmarva in 1998.

Bundy's velocity kept falling every year in the minor leagues. He never threw as hard as he did in high school when he would sit in the high 90s. By the time he was in Bowie he was good, but not amazing. Bedard had better stuff overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I'm not talking about one year because if we want to talk about domination you don't get much more dominant than Matt Riley at Delmarva in 1998.

Bundy's velocity kept falling every year in the minor leagues. He never threw as hard as he did in high school when he would sit in the high 90s. By the time he was in Bowie he was good, but not amazing. Bedard had better stuff overall.

Fair enough.

I still remember, and I know several others do too, Bedard's performance against Texas on 7/7/07.  That was an impressive sight.  Bedard looked like what they say Sandy Koufax did.  I can easily imagine remembering this arm.

I just went and looked at his minor league stats.  He averaged over 11 K/9 in the MiLs for the O's back when that would have meant something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/6/2021 at 4:35 PM, Tony-OH said:

Stowers has the best tools and has produced fairly well this year. He's got the most upside for me out of this group.

 

I see what you mean.  He's now hitting even better in Bowie than he did at Aberdeen.  I didn't realize he had this kind of power.  It's exciting to follow the kind of progress he's making this year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/10/2021 at 6:39 PM, Frobby said:

“Just?”

I could have sworn I responded to this, but I don't see it.  Anyway, the gist was I'd be happy if he "just" got to the SO rate he had in his other minor league season - roughly 23% of his plate appearances - rather than the 33% rate he's at now.  And he has been showing progress over the last several games.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ruzious said:

I could have sworn I responded to this, but I don't see it.  Anyway, the gist was I'd be happy if he "just" got to the SO rate he had in his other minor league season - roughly 23% of his plate appearances - rather than the 33% rate he's at now.  And he has been showing progress over the last several games.  

Well, I hope he is able to do it.   Generally, players strike out more the higher they get in the minors, as the pitching gets tougher and tougher.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Well, I hope he is able to do it.   Generally, players strike out more the higher they get in the minors, as the pitching gets tougher and tougher.   

It's a normal part of the process.  Batters get better too.  I'm not implying this is anything easy, but it's not like this is an impossible hurdle or anything even close to it.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Why does everybody want to jump and label a kid so fast? What is this, his 2nd major-league season? Yes, certainly they shouldn't go into next year thinking he's a lock for 30+ starts and 180-200 innings but we can't say he's already reached his peak either. 
    • And their defense is very good. To put things in perspective, the Tigers collective dWAR is +0.5. The Orioles is -2.8. Minnesota -4.1, Yankees -0.3, Houston -0.1, Seattle +2.0, Royals at +2.5. The Royals really standout as most of that value is driven by Fermin (catcher) and Witt.  But I think my point is that the Tigers have excellent pitching (starting pitching and bullpen) as well as excellent defense. And they're not putrid with the bats.  I would say the one saving grace about the Tigers is they don't run much. 
    • We could have easily swept Detroit in Baltimore, the lineup we have now is not the lineup they faced. It doesn't matter who the opponent is, just win.
    • Both of them are important to consider here. They could have a mediocre offense every single game of the season, but if the pitching is elite (and it is!), it'll carry them.  We have 6 games against the Tigers this year. And yes, most of them were without the cadre of regulars. But here are the offensive numbers against them: .211/.282/.392 - .674 OPS They scored 20 runs in 6 games against them. Barely scraping 3 R/G. And a good portion of them coming in *1* game.  Out of the WC potentials the O's could face, here are their R/G: Royals: 29 in 6 games = 4.8 R/G Twins: 22 in 3 = 7.3 R/G Mariners: 27 in 6 = 4.5 R/G Tigers: 20 in 6 = 3.3 R/G Out of all the playoff teams, the best RA/G are the Mariners (3.75), Guardians (3.85), and Tigers (4.96). For the playoffs, you want to look at who you're facing on the bump. Which team scares you the most? Because if you can't hit against the team, it doesn't matter what the opposing offense is.  Also you'll want to consider the best fielding teams, too.   Seems to me you'd want to face the team you matchup best against *and* who has the worst defense and worst pitching, because presumably your 3 starters (Burnes, Eflin, Kremer) should be able to hold teams in check. 
    • I'd prefer Detroit - they've been so hot for so long they should be due to cool off. KC has been just the opposite. 
    • I'd say the Royals...pitch around Witt and Salvy Perez who seems to have had our number in recent years.  The rest of their lineup isn't too imposing. Wacha  -a guy I wanted this offseason and was laughed at for wanting him- has a 2.64 ERA over his last 15 starts.  He's the soft-tossing type that gives our lineup fits and, IIRC, he was great against us earlier this year.  Lugo has had a great year, so has Ragans.  Their starters are good. But they're 3-7 over their last 10 while the Tigers are 8-2.  A lot of the postseason, IMO, is catching teams at the right/wrong time.  This could all change by next week but the Tigers are hot, the Royals are not... Then again, I said I wanted to face Texas in the first round last year and look what happened.  So who knows.  
    • Would much rather face KC and to me it’s not close.    game 1 agains Skubal is an L. They’ve proven they can beat us with a bullpen game, a bullpen only behind CLE as best in the AL.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...