Jump to content

I kind of enjoyed the Phillies series


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Three taut, low scoring games, 2-0, 3-2 (in 10 innings), 4-3.    All three came down to the last at bat.   Obviously I enjoyed the first game better than the next two, and the bullpen frustrated me no end in the latter two games.   But still it was pretty refreshing to play three consecutive games like that where we were never out of it and the pitching for the most part was solid. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Sometimes your burn it to the ground rebuild gives you the Astros, sometimes you get the Phillies.

2015 (1:10) Cornelius Randolph

2016 (1:1) Mickey Moniak

2017 (1:8) Adam Hasely

2018 (1:3) Alex Bohm

2019 (1:14) Bryson Stott

2020 (1:15) Mick Abel

 

One thing seems apparent.   They didn't draft any game changers during this period.   They also didn't suck as bad as the Astros and Orioles.  Only two top 5 picks but it looks like they didn't strike gold with either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RZNJ said:

2015 (1:10) Cornelius Randolph

2016 (1:1) Mickey Moniak

2017 (1:8) Adam Hasely

2018 (1:3) Alex Bohm

2019 (1:14) Bryson Stott

2020 (1:15) Mick Abel

 

One thing seems apparent.   They didn't draft any game changers during this period.   They also didn't suck as bad as the Astros and Orioles.  Only two top 5 picks but it looks like they didn't strike gold with either.

Thank you.

I knew someone was going to point out that they didn't suck as bad.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

2015 (1:10) Cornelius Randolph

2016 (1:1) Mickey Moniak

2017 (1:8) Adam Hasely

2018 (1:3) Alex Bohm

2019 (1:14) Bryson Stott

2020 (1:15) Mick Abel

 

One thing seems apparent.   They didn't draft any game changers during this period.   They also didn't suck as bad as the Astros and Orioles.  Only two top 5 picks but it looks like they didn't strike gold with either.

Oof. They’re three great players and not much else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Phil’s also signed Kingery to a long term deal and that didn’t work out.  Lots of bad luck and poor decision making by them the last 5ish years.

Yep, a lot of this rebuild stuff is luck.  I don't think people here are going to understand that if/when our rebuild falls on its face.

Of course you try to mitigate the luck factors as much as you can but really..at the end of this day a lot of this stuff is out of the control of what the owners/managers/GMs are trying to do.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Yep, a lot of this rebuild stuff is luck.  I don't think people here are going to understand that if/when our rebuild falls on its face.

Of course you try to mitigate the luck factors as much as you can but really..at the end of this day a lot of this stuff is out of the control of what the owners/managers/GMs are trying to do.

Luck is the residue of design.   The more good decisions you make, the luckier you tend to get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

Yep, a lot of this rebuild stuff is luck.  I don't think people here are going to understand that if/when our rebuild falls on its face.

Of course you try to mitigate the luck factors as much as you can but really..at the end of this day a lot of this stuff is out of the control of what the owners/managers/GMs are trying to do.

The success of any individual player certainly has a ton of luck involved.

But if you improve the processes -- scouting, data analysis helping decide which players to acquire and how to get the most out of the ones you have, player development, teaching, analytics helping you make game/lineup decisions, etc., then the outcomes you get should trend upwards, as opposed to if you didn't make those improvements.

That was the promise that the Elias/Mejdal team had for me.  They would improve all those processes and we'd draft a guy who had a 30% chance of success over a guy with a 20% chance of success that we might have taken in the past, and then superior development and analytics would help the guy reach his potential 40% of the time instead of 30% of the time.   Repeat that over dozens of players and we'd have better players.

And starting to see poor results from mid level pitching prospects on the third year in is a huge disappointment and red flag as far as I am concerned.   Maybe I can't see the forest for the trees.   Maybe Akin will become a decent #5 starter, and Zimmermann will get healthy and also be a back end starter, and Kremer will recover from a lost year for whatever reason and become a usable major leaguer.  Then suddenly this year wasn't as much of a failure as it appears in the short term view.   And obviously the deliberate use of over a dozen non-prospect pitchers to eat almost 400 innings (Harvey 127.2 Plutko 56.1 Watkins 51.1 Valdez 46 Eshelman 24 Ellis 22.1 Greene 20 Anderson 10 Wade 8.2 Knight 8.2 LeBlanc 6.2 Hanhold 6.1 Jannis 3.1 Barreda 2.2 Fla 1.1 Burdi 1 Waddell 1 Kriske 0.1) = over 30% of our innings this year ... that makes the pitching look worse than it was because none of those guys will be around.

But right now, the state of pitching in our system is a concern.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

Not to mention, Philly is starting a SS we got rid of - at 3B.  And they have a poor bullpen themselves.  

The amazing thing is, as bad as their bullpen is, it's still a big improvement over last year's dumpster fire Philly bullpen, which approached historic levels of badditude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I disagree Mayo is one of the reasons the Orioles have not hit well.  Emmanuel Rivera, who has hit well with an .879 OPS since he joined the O's, has gotten the playing time over Mayo.  
    • I was sort taking that as a fait accompli. Signing expensive long-term free agent deals for one dimensional sluggers heading into their 30s definitely does not seem like Elias's style, especially when an extra high draft pick (and accompanying extra bonus pool money) is the reward for not doing so.
    • Game 153, Sept. 19 Lots of notable defensive plays today.   Kjerstad made two excellent catches, one going back and towards the RCF alley that (per Kevin Brown) was a 50% probability catch, and another going back to the wall near the corner and making the catch at close to full speed.   Holliday snared a line drive at the top of his leap, and also made a nice backhand running catch of a soft fly into medium RF. Mullins made a diving catch in the 7th on a sinking liner that he got a great jump on.   In the 9th, with runners on 1st and 2nd, Heliot hit a liner in the RCF gap that carried much further than it first appeared it would.   Mullins and Slater dove for it simultaneously and Slater actually gloved it for a second before it popped out while Slater landed on Mullins.  Luckily, the two base runners totally misread the play, and after Slater quickly scrambled to his feet and threw the ball in, the runner originally on 2B scored but the runner on 1st only advanced to 2B, and the batter had to stop at first.  The O’s were able to keep any further runs from scoring. One thing I’ve noticed about Manny Rivera is that he’s very slow charging bunts and slow rollers/choppers. He handled one bunt and one chopper in front of him today and both times the runner beat his throw rather easily, something that has happened a lot when Rivera has manned 3B.   I’m more than ready to have Urias -and/or Westburg back at the hot corner.    
    • Don’t know what happened to him on here but I did meet him and some others from The Sun forums at the park on Matt Wieters first game as an Oriole. If I recall correctly his name was Patrick.  He seemed like a good dude but he did have his face painted and was wearing those big hulk hands…which did strike me as a little odd for a grown man but to each his own. 
    • ….as long as it’s not us 
    • Is it just me or did they sound the HR / walk-off siren before the ball actually went out? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...