Jump to content

O’s sign Jordan Lyles


LookinUp

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

They paid 7M for what they hope to be 170 or more innings.  That’s it.

End of the day, there really is no more analysis needed.  He’s not good, the innings probably won’t be quality ones but if he takes the ball every 5th day and gets you into the 6th inning and beyond most nights, that has value to a team that needs it badly.

Well, the issue is whether he really will get us into the 6th inning most nights.   That depends on how hard he’s getting hit, particularly when the middle innings roll around.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

Well, the issue is whether he really will get us into the 6th inning most nights.   That depends on how hard he’s getting hit, particularly when the middle innings roll around.  

Sure..but he did it in 2021 and got hit hard.

Now, will the differences of the parks and the division make a difference?  Who knows.  
 

I will say this..I have more confidence in him to give us over 150 IP of 5ish ERA ball than most of the young starters we saw last year.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Make no mistake about it..this signing occurred because of the failure of those young starters.  You should never pay a guy any real money to give us what Lyles will.  You should be able to bring up MiL pitchers all day long that can come close to that but for 600k.

But they failed miserably as a group.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Make no mistake about it..this signing occurred because of the failure of those young starters.  You should never pay a guy any real money to give us what Lyles will.  You should be able to bring up MiL pitchers all day long that can come close to that but for 600k.

But they failed miserably as a group.

True.  I hope it goes better this year for those guys, and of course, for Grayson.   And Bradish.   

It’s amazing to me how Tampa never seems to have these hiccups.  They bring up a guy like Baz and he looks good right away.  Granted, he was a highly regarded prospect, but seems like even our better prospects never seem to debut smoothly.   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My takeaway from Lyles and Odor is that Elias is no more committed to winning games in 2022 than he was in 2021. It also does nothing to lessen my concern that he while can build a system full of talent, does he know how to construct a roster and coaching staff that is playoff caliber? Obviously that’s not what these signings are about, but these are highly uninspired acquisitions. 

  • Upvote 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, UMDTerrapins said:

My takeaway from Lyles and Odor is that Elias is no more committed to winning games in 2022 than he was in 2021. It also does nothing to lessen my concern that he while can build a system full of talent, does he know how to construct a roster and coaching staff that is playoff caliber? Obviously that’s not what these signings are about, but these are highly uninspired acquisitions. 

It's discouraging that he does not seem to think the timing is right to get more competitive. That has nothing to do with whether he knows how to do it. I am pretty sure he does not think Odor and Lyles are getting us to the playoffs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

It's discouraging that he does not seem to think the timing is right to get more competitive. That has nothing to do with whether he knows how to do it. I am pretty sure he does not think Odor and Lyles are getting us to the playoffs.  

But it’s the thought process behind the moves.  That’s the disturbing thing.

He is paying 2 very bad players to have prominent roles on the team in 2022.  That should never be the case.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

Means gave Holt some credit with his changeup, but other than that, who has Holt made better and why do you think he's some magic wand for pitchers? I don't dislike Holt as a coordinator, but I see very little that he has improved to make me think he's a difference maker for a 31 year old pitcher.

Holt has some pluses and some minuses.

Pluses: Helped Means become who he is today.  A lot of that was Means himself.  Changed Lopez delivery and while he is not an effective starter to me he may be an effective reliever.   Brought Tyler Wells along nicely.    I think Holt communicates well, knows a lot about analytics and how to apply them to his pitchers.  I have read some good things about how Holt helped minor leaguers. I think Rom was one of them.

Minuses:   Biggest was I think he rushed a lot of the young starters last year by  calling up before they had much time at AAA.  He seem to have thought the alternate site  work was equal to AAA and it proved not to be. That call might have been him but it might have been Elias.    Also he left the team for a month last year.  I think that hurt some of the young pitchers.

Why do I think he can help Lyles?   I don't evaluate any of the time with the Rockies because its the worse place to pitch.  I don't think the Pirates or the Ranger have good pitching programs.   Chris Hook with the Brewers is a good coach and Lyles did well there.   His numbers were probably a little lucky but even raising them some he would still have done well there.

From Baseball Savant Lyles appears to have been effective with difference pitches at different time.  But at least he has show effectiveness.  I think Holt can put him through his analytic evaluation program and help Lyles understand how to use his pitches better.  Maybe even stop throwing certain pitches.   I think Holt may be able to help Lyles recreate 2019 with the Brewers.  We will see.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

It's discouraging that he does not seem to think the timing is right to get more competitive. That has nothing to do with whether he knows how to do it. I am pretty sure he does not think Odor and Lyles are getting us to the playoffs.  

The Lyles move concerns me more than Odor, because it feels like we are spending money just to say we spent it.  We probably could have gotten a similar pitcher in February for considerably less money.   $7 mm should buy someone better.   Of course, getting pitchers to come to Baltimore right now isn’t easy.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Roch is hilarious. I can’t blame the guy for doing what it takes to go to work, but he really is basically Jim Hunter, and that’s not meant to be disrespectful. 

I like Roch and regularly read his articles. You just have to remember he’s a PR person for the Orioles and not a journalist who will criticize the team when warranted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Frobby said:

The Lyles move concerns me more than Odor, because it feels like we are spending money just to say we spent it.  We probably could have gotten a similar pitcher in February for considerably less money.   $7 mm should buy someone better.   Of course, getting pitchers to come to Baltimore right now isn’t easy.   

Agreed on Lyles, I don't like it on any level. I just don't think it's fair to even begin assessing his ability to put together a competitive roster since that's clearly not what he's doing right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Holt has some pluses and some minuses.

Pluses: Helped Means become who he is today.  A lot of that was Means himself.  Changed Lopez delivery and while he is not an effective starter to me he may be an effective reliever.   Brought Tyler Wells along nicely.    I think Holt communicates well, knows a lot about analytics and how to apply them to his pitchers.  I have read some good things about how Holt helped minor leaguers. I think Rom was one of them.

Minuses:   Biggest was I think he rushed a lot of the young starters last year by  calling up before they had much time at AAA.  He seem to have thought the alternate site  work was equal to AAA and it proved not to be. That call might have been him but it might have been Elias.    Also he left the team for a month last year.  I think that hurt some of the young pitchers.

Why do I think he can help Lyles?   I don't evaluate any of the time with the Rockies because its the worse place to pitch.  I don't think the Pirates or the Ranger have good pitching programs.   Chris Hook with the Brewers is a good coach and Lyles did well there.   His numbers were probably a little lucky but even raising them some he would still have done well there.

From Baseball Savant Lyles appears to have been effective with difference pitches at different time.  But at least he has show effectiveness.  I think Holt can put him through his analytic evaluation program and help Lyles understand how to use his pitches better.  Maybe even stop throwing certain pitches.   I think Holt may be able to help Lyles recreate 2019 with the Brewers.  We will see.

 

So basically, Holt does the same things most pitching coaches do.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aristotelian said:

Agreed on Lyles, I don't like it on any level. I just don't think it's fair to even begin assessing his ability to put together a competitive roster since that's clearly not what he's doing right now. 

Of course it’s fair.  He could get better players.  He could do more than he is doing even without ownership being involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in agreement with Sports Guy here.  Lyles fills a need for a team with only one pitcher, Means, that has proven capable of going past 5 innings in a game.  He's not a long-term answer or a "nugget."  But, he can help until better pitchers arrive through the farm - Rodriguez and Hall - or by trade.  As to Odor, I don't think he's promised any role beyond a tryout in spring training and a chance to push Matteo and Urias.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Perhaps, I don't really know. Since my press credentials were not renewed after COVID, I don't really know the new announcers besides Brett Hollander, due his WBAL days. I knew Arnold a little bit from his Frederick time.  Either way, I don't get the impression that Melanie talks out of turn or doesn't know what she can or can't say. Perhaps she was talking to Hyde and he said something offhand like, "Maybe even Bautistsa will be ready by the playoffs." Who knows?  I've been in a lot of situations talking with players and coaches and I knew what I could or could not say and when it was appropriate to report something, even if it was from an "unnamed source." I'm fairly certain Melanie would not still have a job with the Orioles if she did not know this by now too. 
    • It's a little surprising she would go "off-script", so to speak, on MASN when Elias has denied any chance of Bautista pitching this year. But perhaps MASN folks have a little more freedom under Rubenstein. 
    • Well, they got some good starts from Bradish so we'll see if that helps them win the AL East. If they win it by a game or two you can say he had an impact on this season. Bradish could still be back by the end of 2025 if everything goes smoothly.
    • Not to turn this into a Melanie Newman thread again, but she's actually not too bad when she's doing the color part of the broadcast. She'll drop some meaningful statistical information occasionally and the other day she said something (can't remember exactly what it was) and I was like, "Hmm, not bad Melanie" in my head. The issue is she just too slow in describing the action and does not paint a good enough picture of where the balls are hit or the likely outcome.  An example would be something like this.  "He hits a skyball into the deep blue sky....(second of pause) the outfielder is going out for it but he won't get it. And Henderson is on second for a double. We don't know where, how far, or what the action was other than the ball was a skyball and the outfielder misses it. She'll then go back and explain in more detail what happened. I better call would be "Henderson lines a ball into deep right center, the center fielder is going over quickly but it's going to fall in, Henderson is rounding first, heading for second as the CF throws the ball in to the cut off as Henderson walks into second with a standup double." Now we have a much better picture of what happened in our minds.  Arnold gets too wordy at times too and sometimes gets behind but he's still better overall and has the best radio voice. Brett Hollander is the best at PBP in my opinion despite my "dislike" for him calling the Orioles "Baltimore" like an away/national announcer.      
    • I feel as though they bungled Bautista and Bradish’s injuries by delaying the inevitable. Because of those delays, it could be no Bautista until 2025 and no Bradish until 2026. 
    • I think it’s fair to ask if he’s getting much to hit. With all the walks, it certainly seems like teams are staying away from him, even more so than Mayo. Would be nice to get some real reports about what is going on down there.
    • I take it more as this is the talk behind the scenes and she just didn’t read the room well enough to know she wasn’t supposed to say anything.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...