Jump to content

Grayson Rodriguez 2022


justD

Recommended Posts

Both Bradish and Grayson need to be up by early-to-mid May, IMO, if they're continuing to pitch well. I think that's a more-than-reasonable, averagely-conservative timeline considering all the factors: health, building up to 100 pitches, double-checking that any work these guys have done in the offseason is translating, whatever. Beyond that I would consider far too conservative given the state of the big league pitching staff. It's time to start making the transition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, btdart20 said:

First two names that come to mind for me:  Clemens and Mussina.  Obviously, those are unfair comparisons for anyone with no ML experience and I'm not expecting those types of careers (though that would be awesome).  But Grayson's size, FB, control, and multiple plus pitches rhymes with what Clemens/Mussina came in with as well.  Grayson also seems to have that chip on his shoulder to improve/be the best like those guys (all professional players have that to some degree, but some seem to have "it" to another level).  Grayson's MiLB numbers compare favorably to both (K/BB, WHIP).  Both of those had lower ERA and gave up less HR (no idea about park factors).   (DL Hall is more along the Scherzer lines to me with his live arm but lesser control coming into the league.)

Both of them had 40-50ish IP less in the MiLB than Grayson as well...  He's ready.

I am seeing Schilling too. Identical 6' 5" 220 lb build. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Between Baz's elbow cleanup slowing him down and Strasburg-ian scouting reports from Arizona speeding him up, Daniel Espino might be Rodriguez's newest closest rival for pitching prospect top dog.

Espino 1.5.2001 is starting the year with his AA debut and has gone 134 pitches his first two games, 16/3 K/BB

Rodriguez 11.16.1999 - AAA debut and 128 pitches, 15/1 K/BB

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Minorleaguebaseball is giving Rodriguez as the probable for tomorrow at 630 as he will get five days rest once again between turns.

(Elsewhere in probables, appears the Baysox will face Daniel Espino this weekend).

Durham (Rays AAA) lineup tonight has Vidal Brujan leading off, but not quite so loaded as last year's Wander Franco-Josh Lowe squad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, luismatos4prez said:

This is absurd. He has nothing left to learn in the minors. His next start should be at home next weekend against the Red Sox.

What does he gain by striking out every other batter in AAA?

He avoids the stress of going through arbitration four times.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • 1:2 is good.  Elite is a player like Arraez who is 1+:1.  
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...